Assessment of Learners' Proficiency in Albay Biosphere Reserve (ABR) Concepts: A Basis for Curricular Integration

This research focused on determining the proficiency levels of Grade 8 learners in terms of Albay Biosphere Reserve (ABR) concepts across three domains: knowledge, sensitivity, and practice. Utilizing a descriptive research design with 41 Grade 8 respondents from Jovellar National High School, Jovellar Albay Philippines, the study identified a significant pedagogical gap despite Albay's UNESCO designation. Assessments revealed a foundational but incomplete grasp of local ecological systems wherein learners achieved a 'moderate' proficiency level in Knowledge (M=32.20), an ‘average’ level of Environmental Sensitivity (M=3.17), and a notable 2.53 mean interpreted as ‘moderately observed’ in Environmental Practices. The study highlights the need for developing lessons structured in supporting the integration of Albay Biosphere Reserve Concepts in science education.

Albay Biosphere Reserve (ABR), Knowledge Proficiency, Environmental Sensitivity, Place-Based Education

1. Aguilar, R. (2021). Traditional waste management practices in rural Bicol: The persistence of open burning. Bicol University Research Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chawla, L. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. Environmental Education Research, 26(11), 1485–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1818287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Fenitra, R. M., Giraud, M., & Praene, J. P. (2021). From environmental knowledge to household sustainable behavior: The mediating role of environmental sensitivity. Sustainability, 13(21), 11843. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Frontiers in Psychology. (2025). Cognitive vs. conative sensitivity in environmental education: The role of clean-campus initiatives. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Frontiers in Sustainability. (2026). Theoretical vs. practical disaster risk reduction in basic education curricula. Frontiers in Sustainability, 7, Article 45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (2024). The traditional model of environmental behavior: Re-evaluating the entry-point variable of sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 55(2), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Journal of Environmental Psychology. (2025). The bystander effect in school conservation: Why administrative roles hinder student stewardship. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 89, Article 101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kim, S., Park, J., & Lee, H. (2022). The impact of indifference: Analyzing students' environmental awareness profiles in character education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), 215–230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2024). Mind the gap: Why theoretical knowledge fails to trigger sustainable habits without procedural nudges. Environmental Education Research, 30(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lee, C., Wu, Y., & Chen, J. (2025). Systems thinking and scientific reasoning in identifying environmental solutions among secondary learners. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(1), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. MDPI Sustainability. (2024). Environmental self-efficacy and the perception of individual impact in climate mitigation. Sustainability, 16(3), 1542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. National Environmental Awareness and Education Act of 2008, Rep. Act No. 9512 (2008). https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2008/12/12/republic-act-no-9512/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Semken, S. (2025). Sense of place and place-based education in the geosciences. Arizona State University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sobel, D. (2024). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities (4th ed.). Orion Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2019). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. UNDP Philippines. (2023). Climate change and disaster risk reduction: Vulnerability assessment of Philippine provinces. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/philippines/publications/climate-change-and-disaster-risk-reduction [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. UNESCO. (2019). South East Asian Biosphere Reserve Network (SeaBRnet) 12th meeting report. UNESCO Office Bangkok. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371531 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. UNESCO. (2024). Biosphere reserves: Living laboratories for sustainable development. UNESCO Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme. https://www.unesco.org/en/mab/biosphere-reserves [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Villaluz, J., Santos, M., & Reyes, K. (2024). Participatory workshops vs. standard lectures: Changing environmental behavior in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 9(1), 12–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]