Key Stage 1 Teachers’ Preparedness in Handling Learners with Special Educational Needs
Authors
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus Cebu City (Philippines)
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus Cebu City (Philippines)
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus Cebu City (Philippines)
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus Cebu City (Philippines)
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus Cebu City (Philippines)
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus Cebu City (Philippines)
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus Cebu City (Philippines)
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus Cebu City (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000088
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 1035-1060
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-14
Accepted: 2025-10-22
Published: 2025-11-05
Abstract
Inclusive education has emerged as a global priority, emphasizing equitable learning opportunities for all students, including those with special educational needs (SEN). In the Philippines, national policies such as Republic Act 11650 and DepEd Orders 44 and 23 underscore the commitment to inclusive practices. However, the implementation remains challenging, particularly among Key Stage 1 (K1) teachers. This study aimed to assess the level of preparedness of K1 public school teachers in handling learners with special needs in Tagbilaran City Schools Division, Bohol Province, for the school year 2024–2025. Employing a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, quantitative data were gathered through a validated survey questionnaire, while qualitative insights were obtained via reflexive thematic analysis of interviews. Findings revealed that teachers demonstrated a generally positive attitude and moderate skills toward inclusive education but exhibited gaps in knowledge, particularly regarding the use of assistive technologies and individualized education planning. No significant differences were found in preparedness levels across demographic variables such as age, specialization, service length, and educational attainment. Challenges identified included limited training, behavioral management difficulties, resource scarcity, balancing class demands, and inconsistent institutional support. The study concludes that while K1 teachers are motivated, systemic gaps hinder full inclusive practice. An action plan focusing on continuous training, resource enhancement, peer mentoring, and stronger administrative support is proposed to address these challenges. The findings contribute to strengthening inclusive education initiatives, offering policy and practice recommendations applicable to similar urban Philippine contexts and beyond.
Keywords
Special Education, Key Stage 1, Teachers, Preparedness
Downloads
References
1. Adams, D., Mohamed, A., Moosa, V., & Shareefa, M. (2021). Teachers’ readiness for inclusive education in a developing country: Fantasy or possibility? Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1908882 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework. OECD Education Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337C2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Arboiz, A., & Aoanan, G. (2024). Teacher Efficacy And Attitude In Inclusive Education As Predictors Of Readiness For Inclusive Education: An Explanatory Sequential Design. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra17137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Balgos, L. R., & Albores, N. J. (2025). Within the classroom doors: Unveiling the lived experiences of general education teachers in handling learners with special educational needs. International Journal of Educational Management & Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.53378/ijemds.353145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Charli, M. S., Eshete, S. K., & Debela, K. (2022). Learning how research design methods work: A review of Creswell’s Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5901 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Demir, S. B., & Pismek, N. (2018). A convergent parallel mixed-methods study of controversial issues in social studies classes: A clash of ideologies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(1), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. DeSutter, K. and LeMire, S. (2016). Exploring the special education versus regular education decisions of future teachers in the rural midwest. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(4), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Dunst, C. and Bruder, M. (2013). Preservice professional preparation and teachers’ self-efficacy appraisals of natural environment and inclusion practices. Teacher Education and Special Education the Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 37(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413505873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ecoben, M. E. (2019). Readiness of public-school teachers in handling inclusive education. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Englis, Y. C., Galgo, K. P. B., & Galindo, J. D. (2025). Exploring teachers’ perspectives on their inclusive education preparedness. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research. https://doi.org/10.51505/ijebmr.2025.9219 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Frumos, L. (2018). Attitudes and self‐efficacy of romanian primary school teachers towards including children with special educational needs in regular classrooms. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 10(4), 118-135. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/77 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hacıibrahimoğlu, B. and Kargın, T. (2017). Determining the difficulties children with special needs experience during the transition to primary school. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.5.0135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Hau, J. and Rashid, S. (2023). Level of knowledge of special education teachers towards occupational therapy. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i2/16285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2024). Convergent mixed methods designs. In J. Katz-Buonincontro, How to mix methods: A guide to sequential, convergent, and experimental research designs (pp. 73–82). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000404-005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Knackstedt, K., Leko, M., & Siuty, M. (2017). The effects of secondary special education preparation in reading: research to inform state policy in a new era. Teacher Education and Special Education the Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 41(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417700960 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Logroño, O. C., & Gongora, J. T. (2023). Readiness of regular teachers for the inclusion of learners with special education needs. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i11.5149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mandabon, J. A. (2023). Readiness and efficacy of teachers in handling learners with special educational needs. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science. https://doi.org/10.56726/irjmets45144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Milić, T. (2021). Teachers’ inclusive, augmentative, assistive and IT competences in working with children with special educational needs. https://doi.org/10.22158/fet.v4n2p132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mlolele, G. (2023). Teachers training towards implementation of inclusive education in public primary schools in dodoma region-tanzania. British Journal of Education, 11(10), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.37745/bje.2013/vol11n103345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Moon, O. (2023). Teachers’ readiness and teaching performance in inclusive education: Their relationship to the implementation of inclusive education program. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v6i1.94 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Mucherah, W. (2024). Teacher attitudes and perceived preparedness towards inclusive education in kenya. International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 6(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtepd.335922 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Mugweru, M., Munayi, S., Chumba, J., & Gathoni, B. (2022). Determinants affecting the teaching of physical education to learners with different kinds of disabilities-pe teacher preparedness. African Journal of Education and Practice, 8(5), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.47604/ajep.1637 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Puspitasari, D. (2019). English language teaching in inclusive class: A challenge. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3559221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Qandhi, F. and Kurniawati, F. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education.https://doi.org/10.2991/iciap-18.2019.50 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Razalli, A. R., Ibrahim, H., Mamat, N., Ali, M. M., Masran, N., Ahmad, N. A., & Satari, N. (2021). Preparedness of Special Education Teachers in The Implementation of Inclusive Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Saleem, S., Sajjad, S., & Rauf, M. B. (2019). Training facilities provided by special education schools to students with visual impairment and teachers to use assistive technology. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 10, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sallese, M., Fogarty, M., Whiteside, E., & Montague, M. (2023). Multi-tiered system of supports for teacher preparation: A framework to attract, retain, and prepare special educators. Journal of Special Education Preparation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Sardar, T. S., & Deb, J. (2023). Professionalism and techno-pedagogical integration in elementary school classrooms. Towards Excellence. https://doi.org/10.37867/te150237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Sito, L. R. (2020). Teachers’ preparedness for inclusive education. Mountain Journal of Science and Interdisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.70884/mjsir.v80i2.270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Tanasugarn, A. (2019). Predictors of burnout among Southern California special education teachers. Walden University Dissertation. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/6687/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Taylor, C., Rhys, M., & Waldron, S. (2016). Implementing curriculum reform in Wales: The case of the Foundation Phase. Oxford Review of Education, 42(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1184872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Triviño-Amigo, N., Barrios-Fernández, S., Mañanas-Iglesias, C., Carlos-Vivas, J., Mendoza-Muñoz, M., Adsuar, J., Acevedo-Duque, Á., & Rojo-Ramos, J. (2022). Spanish teachers’ perceptions of their preparation for inclusive education: The relationship between age and years of teaching experience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Walker, V., Pennington, R., Andzik, N., Tapp, M., & Masud, A. (2022). Preservice teachers’ preparation in communication instruction for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 47(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221074720 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Woolfson, L. (2024). Is inclusive education for children with special educational needs and disabilities an impossible dream? The British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Zainalabidin, N. and Ma'rof, A. (2021). Predicting the roles of attitudes and self-efficacy in readiness towards implementation of inclusive education among primary school teachers. Asian Social Science, 17(11), 91. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v17n11p91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study