Quality of Life and Beneficiary Satisfaction in the Targeted Actions to Reduce Poverty and Generate Economic Transformation Program in Candijay: A Mixed Method Study
Authors
Agricultural Technologist Municipality of Candijay (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600033
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 429-444
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-15
Accepted: 2026-05-20
Published: 2026-06-16
Abstract
A mixed-methods approach was utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of the BFAR TARGET Program among fisherfolk in Candijay, Bohol. The majority of beneficiaries were mature individuals (66.66%) aged 51 to 70, with 35.1% having completed primary education. Quantitative analysis, employing a paired t-test, demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in quality of life (p<.001), as reflected by an increase in the average weighted mean (AWM) from 2.31 (Barely Sufficient) to 2.60 (Sufficient). This improvement was accompanied by economic gains, including a reduction in households earning below 5,000.00 pesos from 35.1% to 15.8%, and increased livelihood diversification through homestead gardening (57.9%) and fish processing (29.8%). Beneficiary satisfaction was high (GWM=3.10), particularly with local government unit (LGU) management (AWM=3.21). Pearson correlation analysis (r=128, p=3.42) indicated that satisfaction was primarily associated with the quality of service delivery rather than initial poverty status. Qualitative findings identified gaps related to environmental risks and insufficient investment, revealing that despite economic improvements, most beneficiaries remained below the poverty line, which requires 17,500 pesos per month. To enhance program sustainability, it is recommended that the LGU and BFAR establish direct-to-market linkages to increase net profits, provide disease-resistant seaweed strains to support the 23.5% of beneficiaries engaged in seaweed farming, and implement micro-savings training to strengthen financial resilience against unexpected expenses.
Keywords
TARGET Program, Quality of Life, Beneficiary satisfaction, BFAR, LGU
Downloads
References
1. Allison, Edward H., E. H., & Ellis, Frank, F. (2001). The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy, 25(5), 377–388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anticamara, Jay T., J. T., & Go, Kristine T., K. T. (2016). Declining marine biodiversity and small-scale fisheries in the Philippines. Ocean and Coastal Management, 134, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Apetorgbor, Samuel K., S. K., et al. (2025). Livelihood programs and financial resilience among coastal households. Journal of Coastal Development Studies, 18(2), 44–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Atillo, William, W. (2024). Fisheries extension strategies and sustainable livelihood implementation among municipal fisherfolk. Philippine Journal of Fisheries, 31(1), 22–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Aura, Michelle, M., et al. (2025). Local support systems and sustainability of livelihood interventions. Asian Journal of Rural Development, 14(1), 66–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Baliao, Dan, D., & Galon, Rafael, R. (2021). Fishery inputs, technical training, and household welfare improvement. Aquaculture and Rural Livelihood Review, 9(3), 71–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ballesteros, Marife, M., et al. (2017). Technical coaching and livelihood sequencing in fisheries programs. Philippine Development Review, 44(2), 93–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Béné, Christophe, C., et al. (2010). Small-scale fisheries and rural livelihoods in developing countries. FAO Fisheries Circular, 1008, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources. (2024). TARGET Program implementation report. Quezon City, Philippines: BFAR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources - Special Area for Agricultural Development. (2025). Livelihood support and technical coaching report. Quezon City, Philippines: BFAR-SAAD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Braun, Virginia, V., & Clarke, Victoria, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Cinner, Joshua E., J. E., et al. (2023). Environmental volatility and fisheries sustainability in Southeast Asia. Marine Sustainability Journal, 12(4), 210–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Development Academy of the Philippines. (2022). Citizen/Client Satisfaction Survey handbook. Pasig City, Philippines: DAP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Department of Social Welfare and Development, & World Bank. (2020). Livelihood interventions and poverty reduction among vulnerable households. Manila, Philippines: DSWD and World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Enano, Maria, M., et al. (2024). Quality of life improvements among fisheries livelihood beneficiaries. Journal of Philippine Rural Studies, 15(2), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2004). Socio-economic assessment of small-scale fisheries communities. Rome, Italy: FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2023). Aquaculture and family-based livelihoods in Southeast Asia. Rome, Italy: FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Garcia, Manuel, M., & De Guzman, Teresa, T. (2022). Fishery subsidies and subjective well-being among municipal fishers. Asian Fisheries Science, 35(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Islam, Mohammad, M., et al. (2024). Motorized assets, technical training, and household resilience in coastal communities. International Journal of Fisheries Economics, 16(3), 122–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Labayo, Joseph, J., & Prena, Carla, C. (2021). Educational attainment and labor participation in fisheries communities. Philippine Social Science Journal, 8(1), 50–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lim, Andrea, A., et al. (2021). Asset diversification and household financial stability among fisherfolk communities. Journal of Rural Economics, 13(4), 201–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Macusi, Edison, E., et al. (2025). Family-based fishing livelihoods and household welfare in coastal Philippines. Marine Policy and Society, 21(1), 15–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Municipal Government of Mabinay. (2023). Local grievance systems and community support mechanisms report. Mabinay, Philippines: Municipal Government of Mabinay. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Morgado, Luis, L., & Santos, Regina, R. (2024). Procedural justice and beneficiary satisfaction in rural development projects. Journal of Public Service Delivery, 11(2), 90–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. National Economic and Development Authority Region VII. (2023). Regional poverty threshold report. Cebu City, Philippines: NEDA VII. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Obaob, Michael, M. (2025). Youth migration and aging fisherfolk populations in coastal municipalities. Philippine Coastal Studies Journal, 10(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Oliver, Richard L., R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Perkins, Douglas D., D. D., & Zimmerman, Marc A., M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 569–579. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Pido, Michael, M., et al. (2024). LGU technical support and stakeholder communication in fisheries governance. Philippine Coastal Governance Review, 19(2), 144–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Pomeroy, Robert S., R. S., et al. (2007). Fish wars: Conflict and collaboration in fisheries management in Southeast Asia. Marine Policy, 31(6), 645–656. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Pomeroy, Robert S., R. S., et al. (2024). Adaptive co-management and long-term viability of fisheries livelihood programs. Marine Governance Quarterly, 18(1), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Putnam, Robert D., R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Quevedo, Ian, I., et al. (2009). Demographic trends among small-scale fisherfolk in the Philippines. Philippine Fisheries Journal, 17(2), 89–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Republic of the Philippines. (1991). Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160). Manila, Philippines: Official Gazette. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Republic of the Philippines. (1997). Social Reform and Poverty Alleviation Act (Republic Act No. 8425). Manila, Philippines: Official Gazette. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Republic of the Philippines. (1998). Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998 (Republic Act No. 8550). Manila, Philippines: Official Gazette. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Salayo, Nygel, N., et al. (2024). Diversified entrepreneurship and multiplier effects in coastal livelihoods. Asian Journal of Fisheries Economics, 20(3), 112–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Smith, Jonathan, J., & Garcia, Elena, E. (2025). Capacity-building and resilience among fisheries livelihood beneficiaries. Coastal Community Development Review, 7(1), 14–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Tahiluddin, Anwar, A., & Terzi, Michael, M. (2021). Aquaculture production trends and rural development opportunities in the Philippines. Aquaculture Economics and Management, 25(2), 150–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Tan, Roberto, R., & Reyes, Angela, A. (2025). Market-access gaps and value-chain approaches in fisheries livelihood programs. Journal of Agricultural Marketing Systems, 13(2), 98–114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Villanueva, Grace, G., et al. (2025). Beneficiary satisfaction and market integration support in fisheries programs. Philippine Journal of Governance and Development, 6(1), 40–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Villarino, Carlos, C., et al. (2022). Transparency, efficiency, and client satisfaction in rural development projects. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 12(3), 120–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. World Food Programme. (2022). Food security and livelihood resilience in vulnerable coastal communities. Rome, Italy: WFP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Asian Development Bank. (2023). Income diversification and household stability in Southeast Asia. Manila, Philippines: ADB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Fabinyi, Michael, M., et al. (n.d.). Women’s participation in aquaculture and household resilience. Marine Livelihood Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar