From Aurangzeb to Colonial Policy: Temple Desecration and Popular Perception

This dissertation looks at temple desecration during the Mughal period, particularly under Aurangzeb, and during the colonial era. It emphasizes political, economic, and administrative contexts rather than focusing only on religion. The study argues that temple desecration should not be seen just as an act of religious hostility. It must be understood through various interconnected factors like power, sovereignty, urban changes, and regional politics. The first section examines temple desecration under the Mughals, especially during Aurangzeb’s reign, with a focus on Mathura, Banaras, and the Deccan. It shows that the destruction of temples in these areas was influenced by religion, political assertion, administrative strategies, and the economic role of temples. The study also highlights that the Mughal state, including Aurangzeb, provided support and land grants to various temples while many temples continued to operate during his time. This reflects the complicated, dual nature of Aurangzeb’s policies rather than a simple, one-sided story. The second section addresses temple destruction during the colonial period, especially after 1857, a topic that has often been overlooked. It examines how the British impacted temples through urban planning policies, land acquisition, administrative changes, and municipal improvement projects. Unlike the more direct actions related to certain medieval conflicts, colonial interventions often happened through bureaucratic means and the language of clearance and development. The final section explores popular perceptions and collective memory of these events today. It studies how local communities remember temple desecration and how modern media, such as television, cinema, and social media, have shaped and amplified selective historical narratives. The dissertation concludes that temple desecration was a complex historical occurrence influenced by political authority, administrative processes, economic interests, geography, and regional conditions, rather than religion alone.

temple desecration, Aurangzeb, colonial period, popular perception, sacred spaces.

1. Persian and Marathi Chronicles [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akhbarat-i-Darbar-i-Muʿallā. Persian court bulletins of Aurangzeb’s reign. National Archives of India, New Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Coedès, George. “The Stele Inscription of Preah Khan, Angkor.” In Inscriptions du Cambodge. Hanoi: Imprimerie d’Extrême-Orient, 1941. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Khan, Saqi Must‘aid. Maʾāsir-i-ʿĀlamgīrī. Translated by Jadunath Sarkar. Calcutta: Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1947. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. European Travelogues and Ethnographies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bernier, François. Travels in the Mogul Empire, 1656–1668. Translated by Archibald Constable. London: Archibald Constable, 1891. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Tavernier, Jean-Baptiste. Travels in India. Translated by V. Ball. London: Macmillan, 1889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Colonial and Missionary Records [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Anonymous. Anecdotes of Aurangzeb. London: J. Murray, 1789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Imperial Gazetteer of India. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1881–1887. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kaye, Charles John Griffiths. A Narrative of the Siege of Delhi. London: John Murray, 1878. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mill, James. The History of British India. 3 vols. London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, 1817. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Reports of the Archaeological Survey of India. Vols. 1–20. Calcutta: Government of India Press, 1871–1900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Temple Farmāns (Banaras and Mathura). Persian manuscripts. Banaras Hindu University Manuscript Collection, Varanasi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Secondary Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Baker, Chris, and Pasuk Phongpaichit. A History of Ayutthaya: Siam in the Early Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chandra, Satish. Medieval India: From Sultanate to the Mughals, Part II: Mughal Empire (1526–1748). New Delhi: Har-Anand Publications, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Cohn, Bernard S. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Coedès, George. The Civilization of Angkor. Edited by Walter F. Vella. Translated by Susan Brown Cowing. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1963. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Coedès, George. The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. Translated by Susan Brown Cowing. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1968. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Dalrymple, William. The Last Mughal: The Fall of a Dynasty, Delhi, 1857. New Delhi: Penguin Books, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Davis, Richard H. Lives of Indian Images. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Desai, Madhuri. Banaras Reconstructed: Architecture and Sacred Space in a Hindu Holy City. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Donner, Fred M. The Early Islamic Conquests. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Eaton, Richard M. “Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States.” In Essays on Islam and Indian History. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Faruqi, Zahiruddin. Aurangzeb and His Times. Calcutta: Basu Press, 1935. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Goel, Sita Ram. Hindu Temples: What Happened to Them. 2 vols. New Delhi: Voices of India, 1990–1993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gupta, Narayani. Delhi Between Two Empires, 1803–1931: Society, Government and Urban Growth. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1981. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hardacre, Helen. Of Heretics and Martyrs in Meiji Japan: Buddhism and Its Persecution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Johnson, David A. New Delhi: The Last Imperial City. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kennedy, Hugh. The Great Arab Conquests: How the Spread of Islam Changed the World We Live In. Philadelphia: Da Capo Press, 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mukhia, Harbans. “Historians and Historiography During the Reign of Akbar.” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress 39 (1978). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rizvi, S. A. A. The Wonder That Was India, Volume II: A Survey of the History and Culture of the Indian Sub-Continent from the Coming of the Muslims to the British Conquest, 1200–1700. New Delhi: Picador India, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sarkar, Jadunath. The Life of Aurangzeb, Based on Original Sources. 5 vols. Calcutta: M.C. Sarkar & Sons, 1912–1924. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. “Temple Destruction and the Great Mughals’ Religious Policy in North India: A Case Study of Banaras Region, 1526–1707.” Research Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Truschke, Audrey. Aurangzeb: The Man and the Myth. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Agarwood: A Fragrant Link between India and Southeast Asia
• Pens of Protest: Malayalam Press in the Freedom Struggle
• Long-Term Trends of Temperature and Rainfall in Sivakasi: A Climatic Assessment (1980–2025)
• Iran’s Forgotten Friend William Morgan Shuster: Victim of Anglo-Russian Conspiracy
• The (Moordkop) Murder Hill Massacre 1830: A Historical Analysis of the Griqua-Ndebele Conflict