Review of Gender Mainstreaming Provisions in Urban Planning Policies and Guidelines in India: A Comparative Analysis

Urban spaces in India are not gender-neutral. The strategies city planners use to plan, design and manage cities reflect basic assumptions about who uses public space, how and when. The current research provides an insight into how gender mainstreaming is integrated in significant urban planning standards and regulations in India. The study examines seven policy and planning documents, such as the Smart Cities Mission Guidelines, AMRUT 2.0 Operational and Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI) Guidelines, Master Plan for Delhi 2021, Draft Master Plan for Delhi 2041 and Development Control Regulations. A qualitative document review was performed which fell into five key categories: explicit gender recognition, data and evidence, participatory approaches, resource distribution, and accountability mechanisms. The results show that the gender integration was relatively low in the majority of the planning programs. While the most up-to-date AMRUT 2.0 GESI Guidelines give a comprehensive approach to gender mainstreaming, they are advisory and ineffective as mechanisms for their implementation. Other statutory planning tools, such as Master plans and Development Control Regulations, only have gender-specific sections and are rarely put in position in a systematic manner. The study concludes that an adequate legal framework as well as gender-disaggregated data systems, participatory structures, and formal accountability structures are necessary if gender-responsive urban planning are to progress in India.

gender mainstreaming, urban planning, Smart Cities Mission, AMRUT, master plans, development control regulations

1. Beall, J. (1996). Urban governance: Why gender matters. UNDP Gender in Development Monograph Series. United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Delhi Development Authority. (2007). Master Plan for Delhi 2021. Government of NCT of Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Delhi Development Authority. (2021). Draft Master Plan for Delhi 2041. Government of NCT of Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Khosla, R. (2009). Addressing gender concerns in India's urban renewal mission. UNDP India Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. (2015). Smart Cities Mission: Guidelines. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. (2021). AMRUT 2.0 Operational Guidelines. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. (2023). GESI Guidelines for AMRUT 2.0. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Moser, C. (1993). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice and training. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nesti, G. (2019). Defining and assessing the transformational nature of smart city governance: Insights from four European cases. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 20-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. UN Women. (2015). Policy brief on JNNURM: Gender analysis and recommendations. UN Women South Asia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Macroeconomic Variables as Determinants of Agricultural Exports in Nigeria
• Effect of Street Trading Activities on Urban Land Use in Akure, Nigeria
• Smart Contract Adoption in Sarawak’s Construction Industry: A Schematic Review of Drivers, Barriers, and Innovation Attributes
• Mapping the Components of Age-Friendly Communities for Aging in Place
• Socio-Economic Landscape and Housing Aspirations: The Role of Staff Cooperative Societies in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions