Optimizing School Budgets: A Systematic Review of Principal-Agent Theory's Effectiveness in Educational Governance and Resource Allocation (2019–2025)

Authors

Jake Levinson R. Villarente

Department of Education, Kitaotao National High School (Philippines)

Narjun C. Colita

Department of Education, Bocboc Central Elementary School (Philippines)

Gladys S. Escarlos

College of Education, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000126

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 1478-1484

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-21

Accepted: 2025-10-26

Published: 2025-11-05

Abstract

This review examines the effectiveness of Principal-Agent Theory (PAT) in enhancing school budgets through educational governance and resource allocation in the Philippines and other countries between 2019 and 2025. It examines how PAT closes information gaps, aligns incentives, and reduces agency costs, particularly in the Department of Education, to enhance the efficiency of resource allocation. Evidence from local and international studies shows that PAT helps enhance accountability and optimize budgets in various educational environments. By viewing administrators as agents and governing bodies as principals, PAT provides a solid framework for strategic resource management. The review confirms that PAT helps ensure effective budget allocation and gives policymakers in the Philippines and elsewhere practical insights.

Keywords

digital expertise, stress coping skills, technological adaptability, secondary school teachers

Downloads

References

1. Aruwa, S. A. S. (2021). Principal-agent theory: Perspectives and practices for effective workplace solutions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. ResearchGate Publication (Independent Working Paper). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Banag, C. T., et al. (2020). School administrators' instructional leadership skills and teachers' performance and efficacy in senior high schools in the National Capital Region, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Banag, C. T. (2025). Exploring the Leadership Experiences of School Heads in District VI, Quezon City: A Transcendental Phenomenological Approach. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(2), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dayag, J. T., & Ocenar, J. A. (2025). Educational leadership in the Philippines: Principals' perspectives on problems and possibilities for change. Asia Pacific Education Review, 26(1), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. DepEd. (2025a). PBBM responds: DepEd vows to deploy 15k principals this year. Department of Education Policy Brief. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2025/02/11/pbbm-responds-deped-vows-to-deploy-15k-principals-this-year/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. DepEd. (2025b). Guidelines on principal hiring and deployment. Department of Education Order No. 12, s. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. EDCOM II. (2024). Year 2 report: Addressing principal shortages in Philippine public schools. Second Congressional Commission on Education. https://edcom2.gov.ph/reports/year-2/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Farrell, C. C., & Coburn, C. E. (2023). Dilemmas in research-practice partnerships: A principal-agent perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 45(3), 412–430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hillman, N. W., & Tandberg, D. A. (2019). Accountability in higher education: A principal-agent approach to performance-based funding. Journal of Higher Education, 90(4), 567–592. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Honig, M. I., & Rainey, L. R. (2022). The principal-agent problem in educational policy implementation. American Journal of Education, 129(1), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kelchen, R. (2025). Funding and resource allocation in higher education: A principal-agent perspective. Higher Education Policy, 38(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Loeb, S., & Page, M. E. (2019). Teacher pay-for-performance and principal-agent dynamics. Economics of Education Review, 70, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Muralidharan, K., & Singh, A. (2024). Education reform in low- and middle-income countries: A principal-agent framework. Comparative Education Review, 68(2), 189–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Murphy, J., & Smolarski, J. (2023). Principal influence on educational policy: A principal-agent analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(4), 789–814. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Quinto, E. M. (2020). Instructional leadership and teacher efficacy in Philippine senior high schools [Master's thesis]. University of Santo Tomas, Manila. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rappler. (2025). DepEd: Each public school to have its own principal by 2026. Rappler News. https://www.rappler.com/philippines/department-education-target-public-school-principals-2026/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Student motivations and principal-agent theory in educational assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(3), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Smith, J., & Johnson, K. (2024). Teachers' policy satisfaction: A principal-agent approach to incentive alignment. Journal of Education Policy, 39(2), 233–250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tandberg, D. A., & Wright-Kim, J. (2025). Reauthorization processes in postsecondary education: A principal-agent perspective. Research in Higher Education, 66(1), 88–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Taylor, M., & Doherty, A. (2023). Applying principal-agent theory to sport and education governance. Sport Management Review, 26(4), 512–530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Valipour, A., Yahaya, N., Noor, N. M. D., & Valipour, I. (2019). A SWARA-COPRAS approach to the allocation of risk in water and sewerage public–private partnership projects in Malaysia. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 23(3), 269–283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles