Transforming Machining Waste into Value-Added Materials: A Sustainable Approach for Industrial Innovation and Resource Efficiency
Authors
Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia, (Malaysia)
Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia, (Malaysia)
Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia, (Malaysia)
Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia, (Malaysia)
Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Kuala Lumpur Malaysian Spanish Institute, Kulim, Kedah, Malaysia. (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600232
Subject Category: Engineering & Technology
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 3143-3157
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-21
Accepted: 2026-05-26
Published: 2026-06-20
Abstract
Industrial manufacturing is a major driver of economic development; however, it also generates significant material waste and environmental impact. Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM), in particular, produces substantial quantities of brass wire waste that are typically discarded after a single use. This study investigates the direct reuse of WEDM brass wire waste as a reinforcement material in composite manufacturing, eliminating the need for energy-intensive recycling processes. Composite samples were fabricated and evaluated through mechanical testing in accordance with ASTM standards. The incorporation of WEDM brass wire waste significantly enhances the mechanical performance of the composite system. At an optimal loading of approximately 20 wt.% (particulate form), the developed composite achieved tensile strength of up to 332 MPa, compared to 19.7 MPa for neat epoxy. This represents a substantial improvement in load-bearing capability, primarily due to enhanced stress transfer and crack resistance mechanisms introduced by the metallic reinforcement. More importantly, the optimized composite demonstrates tensile performance comparable to, and slightly exceeding, conventional fibreglass-reinforced epoxy (GFRE), highlighting its potential as a viable alternative reinforcement material.Overall, this work presents a potentially scalable approach, subject to further industrial validation and process optimization. The findings contribute to SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), and SDG 13 (Climate Action).
Keywords
Circular Economy; Sustainable Manufacturing; Waste Utilization; Composite Materials; Machining Waste
Downloads
References
1. Alshammari, B. A., Alenad, A. M., Al-Mubaddel, F. S., Alharbi, A. G., Al-shehri, A. S., Albalwi, H. A., Alsuabie, F. M., Fouad, H., & Mourad, A.-H. I. (2022). Impact of hybrid fillers on the properties of high-density polyethylene-based composites. Polymers, 14(16), 3427. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163427 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aslan, A., Salur, E., Gunes, A., Sahin, O. S., Karadag, H. B., & Akdemir, A. (2019). The mechanical properties of composite materials recycled from waste metallic chips. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(9), 5259–5266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02317-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ben, F., & Olubambi, P. A. (2024). Agro-waste reinforcement of metal matrix composites: A sustainable engineering perspective. Materials Research Express, 11(6), 062004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ad5642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bhoi, S. K., & Satapathy, A. (2024). Sliding wear characteristics of epoxy composites reinforced with metallic fillers. Polymer Composites, 45, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Caldera, S., Jayasinghe, R., Desha, C., Dawes, L., & Ferguson, S. (2020). Evaluating barriers and opportunities for waste upcycling: A systematic review. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 10(1), Article 1080367. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d8.0367 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chiracu, I. G., Ojoc, G. G., Cristea, G. C., Boțan, M., Ceoromila, A. C., Pîrvu, C., Vasiliu, A. V., & Deleanu, L. (2024). Behavior of composites made of glass fibre fabrics and epoxy resin. Polymers, 16(13), 1925. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131925 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dani, M. S. H., & Venkateshwaran, N. (2020). Glass/brass wire mesh hybrid epoxy composites: Mechanical and impact behaviour. Silicon, 14, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00828-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Diniță, A., Ripeanu, R. G., Ilincă, C. N., Cursaru, D., Matei, D., Naim, R. I., Tănase, M., & Portoacă, A. I. (2024). Advancements in fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Polymers, 16(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16010002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Duflou, J. R., et al. (2012). Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 61(2), 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gapsari, F., Purnowidodo, A., Setyarini, P. H., Suteja, S., Abidin, Z., Rangappa, S. M., & Siengchin, S. (2022). Mechanical and flammability properties of hybrid composites with metallic fillers. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 21, 1234–1245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Haris, M., Hassan, M. G., Sapuan, S. M., Suhot, M. A., Dolah, R., Mohammad, M., & Asyraf, M. R. M. (2022). Dynamic mechanical properties of hybrid polymer composites: A review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 19, 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Joseph, E. J., & Panneerselvam, K. (2021). Manufacturing and characterization of particulate-reinforced epoxy composites. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 74, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02202-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Krishnasamy, P., Mylsamy, G., Rajamurugan, G., Subramanian, J., & Dharmaraj, M. M. (2023). Mechanical and acoustic performance of WEDM waste-reinforced composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 44, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844231219316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kulkarni, P., Siddagangaiah, M., Sanjay, M. R., & Siengchin, S. (2023). Effect of hybrid reinforcement on mechanical properties of composites. Polymer Composites, 44, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Miniappan, M., Manikandan, N. A., Rajendran, S., & Prasanna, S. C. (2023). Influence of metallic fillers on composite performance. Polymer Composites, 44, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Pickering, S. J. (2006). Recycling technologies for thermoset composite materials. Composites Part A, 37(8), 1206–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Pimenta, S., & Pinho, S. T. (2011). Recycling carbon fibre reinforced polymers. Waste Management, 31(2), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Prakash, V. R. A., & Jaisingh, S. J. (2018). Mechanical strength behaviour of hybrid fibre-metal composites. Silicon, 10, 2279–2286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9762-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ramesh, M., Rajeshkumar, L., Srinivasan, N., Kumar, D. V., & Balaji, D. (2022). Influence of filler materials on polymer composites: A review. e-Polymers, 22(1), 898–916. https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly-2022-0080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Soudagar, M. E. M., Bashir, M. N., Vijayan, D. S., Hossain, I., Kannan, S., Obaid, S. A., & Lee, J. S. (2024). Mechanical behavior of bio-particulate reinforced composites. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Tatar, J., & Milev, S. (2021). Formation and mechanical properties of hybrid composites. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Vinayaka, N., Somashekar, H. M., Madhu, K. S., Sanjay, M. R., & Siengchin, S. (2022). Mechanical behavior of hybrid composites under various conditions. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 50, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Wu, Y., Liang, Y., Mei, C., Cai, L., Nadda, A., Le, Q. H., Peng, Y., Lam, S. S., & Sonne, C. (2021). Advanced materials and sustainability perspectives. Chemosphere, 277, 130129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact Of UI/UX Design on User Trust and Task Completion in Civic Tech Platforms
- Solar Cell Photovoltaic Model Shell Sp 75
- Development of an Intelligent Traffic Management System to Address Visibility Obstruction at Urban Intersections: A Case Study of Ibadan Metropolis
- Optimum Placement of Facts Devices on an Interconnected Power Systems Using Particle Swarm Optimisation Technique
- Assessing Construction Transformation and Implication on Future Production Flow System