Hybrid Governance and Civilian Survival: Rethinking State Legitimacy in Cameroon’s Anglophone Conflict, 2017-2025
Authors
The University of Bamenda, Cameroon (Cameroon)
The University of Bamenda, Cameroon (Cameroon)
The University of Bamenda (Cameroon)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000054
Subject Category: Politics
Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 804-811
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-25
Accepted: 2026-05-30
Published: 2026-06-22
Abstract
The Anglophone conflict in Cameroon has generated a fragmented political landscape in which state authority is increasingly contested by armed separatist groups. In this context, governance is no longer monopolized by the state but emerges through complex interactions between formal institutions, non-state actors, and local communities. This study examines how systems of hybrid governance shape civilian survival strategies and reconfigure notions of state legitimacy in conflict-affected areas. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork, including interviews with internally displaced persons, community leaders, and civil society actors, as well as policy analysis, the research explores how civilians navigate competing authorities to secure protection, access services, and sustain livelihoods. It further investigates the extent to which separatist groups assume governance functions and how these practices influence local perceptions of legitimacy and authority. By foregrounding civilian agency, the study challenges state-centric approaches to peace building and argues that legitimacy in conflict settings is negotiated through everyday practices rather than imposed through formal institutions. The findings will contribute to academic debates on governance in fragile contexts while providing policy relevant insights for designing more context sensitive and inclusive peace building strategies in Cameroon and comparable African conflicts.
Keywords
Hybrid Governance, Civilian Agency, State Legitimacy, Armed Conflict, Cameroon Anglophone Crisis
Downloads
References
1. Oral sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ateba, Pierre Hanri. Age 43. IDP Trader. Yaounde, 10 February, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Atem, Anastasia. Age 44. Community Leader. Buea, 13 January, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Asonganyi, Helen. Age 43. Worker. Buea, 15 January, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Tabi, Miranda. Age 45. Trader. Buea, 15 January, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Amos. Azinwi, Age 53. Teacher. Buea, 15 January, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Banseka, Alfred. Age 56. Policy Analysis. Buea, 15 January, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ntahki, Edmond. Age 45. Civil society Actor. Buea, 15 January, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Nyang, Adeline. Age 42. Teacher. Buea, 15 January, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Muki, Amos. Age 45. IDP Teacher. Yaounde, 10 February 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Bansai, Etienne. Age 49. Community Leader. Bamenda, 13 February, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Banla, Karl. Age 54. Retired civil servant. Bamenda, 20 February, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Munyika, Agnes. Age 33. Community leader. Bamenda, 20 February, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ntah, Edwin. Age 65. Civil society Actor. Bamenda, 20 February, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Nsai, Gideon. Age 45. IDP Trader. Douala, 24 February 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ndi, Blandine. Age 31. IDP Trader. Bafoussam Mache B, 3 February, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Banla, Sylvester. Age 55. IDP Policy Analysis. Souza Douala, 15 December, 2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Secondary Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Boege, V., Brown, A., & Clements, K. “Hybrid political orders, not fragile states”. Peace Review, 21(1), 2009: 13–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Galula, D. Counterinsurgency warfare: Theory and practice. Praeger: USA, 1964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Human Rights Watch. (2018). These killings can be stopped: Abuses by government and separatist groups in Cameroon’s Anglophone regions. Human Rights Watch. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. International Crisis Group. (2019). Cameroon’s Anglophone crisis: How to get to talks? Brussels: International Crisis Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Lund, C. “Twilight institutions: Public authority and local politics in Africa”. Development and Change, 37(4), 2006: 685–705. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Meagher, K. “The strengths of weak states? Non-state security forces and hybrid governance in Africa”. Development and Change, 43(5), 2012: 1073–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01792.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. NAB, Vc/b/2016/4, The Anglophone crisis, Teacher`s and Common Lawyers Petition to the government, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Scott, J. C. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. London: Yale University Press, 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Terretta, M. Nation of outlaws, state of violence: Nationalism, grassroots democracy, and state building in Cameroon. USA: Ohio University Press, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Conceptual Synthesis of China's Peaceful Policy, Tolerance, and the Logic of Non-Provocative Defence
- Fragility in Motion: Comparative Conflict Systems and External Pressures in the Horn of Africa
- Power as Harm Capacity: A Unified Mathematical Framework for Understanding Social Domination
- Religion and Democratic Governance in Nigeria: Issues and Prospects. (2011-2023)
- Reinterpreting Guy Martin’s African Political Thought in the Contemporary Frame “A Critical Review and Reassessment of Case Studies in Ghana, Tanzania, Senegal, Guinea, and South Africa”