Beyond Legal Measures: Effective Communication and Governance Responses to Misinformation and Fake News in Malaysia

The rapid spread of fake news, misinformation, and defamation in the digital age has emerged as a major concern for Malaysia, endangering public trust, social stability, and national security. Fake news, as opposed to accurate information, spreads faster due to its sensational and shareable nature. This article examines the interaction between effective communication strategies and Malaysia's legal system in addressing fake news and defamation. Utilizing a qualitative method via documentary content analysis, the research analyzed primary legal documents and scholarly articles. The study was conducted thematically, resulting in three core dimensions: (i) the importance of effective communication, (ii) the role of law, and (iii) challenges and ramifications. The findings indicate that while legal provisions under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, the Penal Code, the Defamation Act 1957, and the Sedition Act 1948 provide deterrence and remedial functions, effective communication, which emphasizes transparency, credible official channels, and media literacy, serves as a preventive measure. The repeal of the Anti-Fake News Act (2020) highlights the tension between restrictions and freedom of speech, requiring careful judicial interpretation to avoid overly stringent regulations. The study emphasizes that depending on either legal or communicative frameworks is inadequate; rather, a harmonious combination of both is necessary. Strategic recommendations include regional ASEAN cooperation, public-private partnerships for rapid response mechanisms, rigorous media literacy education, and ongoing legislative changes to address new digital threats such as deepfakes. This dual approach provides a comprehensive framework for protecting Malaysian society against misinformation while upholding democratic values and freedom of expression.

Fake News, Effective Communication, Media Law, Freedom of Expression

1. Ahmad, N., Ali, A. W., & Yussof, M. H. B. (2025). The Challenges of Human Rights in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 16(1), 150-169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alghamdi, J., Luo, S. & Lin, Y. (2024). A comprehensive survey on machine learning approaches for fake news detection. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(17), 51009-51067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anansaringkarn, P. & Neo, R. (2021). How can state regulations over the online sphere continue to respect the freedom of expression? A case study of contemporary ‘fake news’ regulations in Thailand. Information & Communications Technology Law, 30(3), 283-303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anthonysamy, L. & Sivakumar, P. (2024). A new digital literacy framework to mitigate misinformation in social media infodemic. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73(6-7), 809-827. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Asimakopoulos, G., Antonopoulou, H., Giotopoulos, K. & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Impact of information and communication technologies on democratic processes and citizen participation. Societies, 15(2), 40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bernama (2023, 16th March). Check facts via MyCheck.My, SEBENARNYA.MY platforms - Fahmi. [Available Online] https://www.bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2173632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bradshaw, S. (2020). Influence operations and disinformation on social media. Modern Conflict and Artificial Intelligence, Essay Series, 41-47. [Available online] https://www.cigionline.org/modern-conflict-and-artificial-intelligence/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ching, S. Y. (2025, 4th April). Building a fact-checking culture. Thoughts, Bernama. [Available Online] https://www.bernama.com/en/thoughts/news.php?id=2406781 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. d’Haenens, L. & Ioris, W. (2025). Media literacy in a digital age: Taking stock and empowering action. Media and Communication, 13, Article 9579. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Daud, M. & Zulhuda, S. (2020). Regulating the spread of false content online in Malaysia: Issues, challenges and the way forward. International Journal of Business and Society, 21(S1), 32–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Devrim, N. (2025). The role of new media literacy in the perception of trust in social media. Media Literacy and Academic Research, 8(1),75-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Epstein, B. (2020). Why it is so difficult to regulate disinformation online. In. Bennett, W. L. & Livingston, S. (eds.). The Disinformation Age: Politics, Technology, and Disruptive Communication in the United States (pp. 190-210), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fernandez, J. M. (2019). Malaysia’s Anti-Fake News Act: A cog in an arsenal of anti-free speech laws and a bold promise of reforms. Pacific Journalism Review, 25(1/2), 173-192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fernandez, J. M. (2020). Journalists and Confidential Sources: Colliding Public Interests in the Age of the Leak. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Garaschuk, D. & Serhieiev, V. (2025). Infodemics and populism in the digital age: threats to political stability and security challenges. Society and Security, 2(8), 61-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ghazali, W. N. W. M., Husni, A. M., Mohamed, S., Yusoh, M. H., Manan, K. A. & Nasir, N. S. M. (2025). Faith-based approaches to vaccine misconception: A systematic literature review of religious messaging. Intellectual Discourse, 33(2), 731-757. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. González, M. G. (2025). News and fake news: Enhancing media literacy and critical thinking skills in the EFL classroom. (Master’s Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Haron, H. H. (2022). COVID-19 infodemic in Malaysia: A reflection towards improving the regulatory framework on misinformation and fake news. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-Undang Malaysia, 34(1), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Haron, H. H., Shuaib, F. S. & Arsat, N. (2020). Some like it hoax: Lessons in regulating fake news in Malaysia. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, pp. 178-185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Heng, K. (2022). Cambodia-Vietnam relations: Key issues and the way forward. Perspectives, 36, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hossain, S. F. A. (ed.). (2024). Utilizing AI and Smart Technology to Improve Sustainability in Entrepreneurship. Hershey: IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. JomCheck Malaysia. (n.d). [Available Online] https://www.jomcheck.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Karanfiloğlu, M. & Sağlam, M. (2023). Empowering citizens through media literacy: Countering disinformation on social media. In. Topsümer, F., Durmuş, Y. & Yılmaz, B. A. (eds.), Media and Communication in the Digital Age: Changes and Dynamics (pp. 65-76). Istanbul: Özgür Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Katsirea, I. (2018). “Fake news”: reconsidering the value of untruthful expression in the face of regulatory uncertainty. Journal of Media Law, 10(2), 159-188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kruger, A., Chan, E. & Zhang, S. (2022). Verification, monitoring and responsible reporting in an age of information disorder: A guide for practitioners in Southeast Asia. [Available Online] https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/data/UQ_8074f9a/UNESCO_final.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Majeed, N., Hilal, A., & Khan, A. N. (2023). Doctrinal research in law: Meaning, scope and methodology. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 12(3), 127–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Molaoa, P. M. (2024). Exploring the use of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) to advance digital literacy in the teaching and learning of French as a foreign language in Lesotho Secondary schools (Master’s thesis, National University of Lesotho). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Norazan, S. S. & Adnan, W. H. (2024). Factors influencing effective communication and it impact towards Malaysian post pandemic perception: The case of Malaysian government trust. e-Journal of Media and Society (e-JOMS), 7(2), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Raza, S., Khan, T., Chatrath, V., Paulen-Patterson, D., Rahman, M. & Bamgbose, O. (2024). FakeWatch: a framework for detecting fake news to ensure credible elections. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 14(1), Article 142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Romero-Moreno, F. (2025). Deepfake detection in generative AI: A legal framework proposal to protect human rights. Computer Law & Security Review, 58, 106162. Williams, B. (2025). Regulatory approaches to ai-generated content and privacy protection. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Said, F. & Nabilah, F. (2024). Future of Malaysia’s AI governance. White Paper. [Available Online] https://www.isis.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/AI-Governance.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Santos, A., Cazzamatta, R. & Napolitano, C. J. (2025). Holding platforms accountable in the fight against misinformation: A cross-national analysis of state-established content moderation regulations. International Communication Gazette, 17480485251348550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Schuldt, L. (2022). Shaping the fake news discourse: Laws, electoral arenas and the emergence of truth as a public interest. In. Gomez, J. & Ramcharan, R. (eds.), Fake News and Elections in Southeast Asia (pp. 16-44). New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Shiang, L. S. & Wilson, S. (2024). Unraveling fake news in Malaysia: A comprehensive analysis from legal and journalistic perspective. Plaridel, 21(1), 33-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Singh, S. (2024). In what ways does the rise of China’s emerging cognitive warfare capabilities pose a threat to South-East Asia? (Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Smith, R. B. (2020). Fake news in ASEAN. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of New England, Armidale). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sukumaran, S., Chin, Y. H., Rahman, R. & Kadhim, A. A. (2023). Jurisprudence concerning ‘fake news’ and related concepts in Malaysia. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19(SI), 79-99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tamura, H. (2024). The influence of cultural values on the regulatory approach to fake news (Doctoral’s Dissertation, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Vese, D. (2022). Governing fake news: the regulation of social media and the right to freedom of expression in the era of emergency. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 13(3), 477-513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Wan, C., Waheed, M., Zawawi, J. W. M., & Hellmueller, L. (2023). The framing of anti-fake news law in Malaysian newspapers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(3), 1278-1295. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Yatid, M. M. (2019). Truth tampering through social media: Malaysia’s approach in fighting disinformation & misinformation. IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2(2), 203-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Yatid, N. (2019). Media literacy and fake news in Malaysia: An exploratory study. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(4), 201–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zainurin, S. J., Wan Husin, W. N., & Mohd Zainol, N. A. (2024). The challenges of social media usage in developing youth political behaviour towards Malaysian political stability. Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, 22(2), 20058-20069. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Zanuddin, H. & Shin, C. Y. (2020). Relationship between new media literacy and motivation in solving fake news problem. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 11(8), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Daud, M. (2021). Freedom of misinformation and the relevance of co-regulation in Malaysia: A cross-jurisdictional analysis. IIUMLJ, 29, 27.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Subrahmanyam, S. (2025). Collaboration and Collective Action: Addressing the Deepfake Challenge as a Community. In Deepfakes and Their Impact on Business (pp. 143-172). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.