Functional Literacy and Media Exposure of the Grade Six Pupils, Zone 2 of the Schools Division of Zambales

This study determined the functional literacy and media exposure of Grade Six pupils in Zone 2 of the Schools Division of Zambales. It examined the respondents’ demographic profile, level of functional literacy, extent of exposure to mass media, and the significant relationship between functional literacy and media exposure. The study utilized a descriptive-quantitative research design using a survey questionnaire as the primary research instrument, while descriptive and inferential statistics, including Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), were employed to analyze the gathered data. Findings revealed that most respondents were female and in their early adolescence stage. The pupils demonstrated a very satisfactory level of functional literacy, indicating that they possessed adequate reading, comprehension, communication, and problem-solving skills necessary for academic learning. The respondents were also sometimes exposed to various forms of mass media, particularly electronic devices, television, radio, print media, and internet-based platforms. Statistical analysis showed significant differences between functional literacy performance and age, as well as between functional literacy and exposure to electronic devices. A significant relationship existed between the use of electronic devices and exposure to different forms of mass media among the respondents. The study concludes that media exposure, particularly through electronic devices, influences learners’ functional literacy performance. Hence, teachers, parents, and school administrators may promote responsible media use and provide activities that enhance literacy and critical thinking skills.

Functional Literacy, Media Exposure, Mass Media

1. Al-Yafi, K., El-Masri, M., & Tsai, R. (2018). The effects of using social network sites on academic performance: The case of Qatar. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barton, E. A., & Dexter, S. (2020). Sources of teachers’ self-efficacy for technology integration from formal, informal, and independent professional learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 89–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bishop, S., Munoz, C., & Marshall, T. (2022). Digital equity and inclusion for education: Literature review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cabello, C. A. (2022). Higher education professors in blended learning modality of teaching: The silent tears of heroes towards resiliency. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 6171–6183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Calero, J., Murillo Huertas, I. P., & Raymond Bara, J. L. (2019). Education, age, and skills: An analysis using PIAAC data. European Journal of Education, 54(1), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12318 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017. Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education. (2023). National Achievement Test report, Grade 6 SY 2020–2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ewing, R., Callow, J., & Rushton, K. (2016). Language and literacy development in early childhood. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Feng, S., Wong, Y. K., Wong, L. Y., & Hossain, L. (2019). Internet and Facebook usage on academic distraction of college students. Computers & Education, 134, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Feri, A., & Zulherman, Z. (2021). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan media pembelajaran IPA berbasis Nearpod. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(3), 418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Flisi, S., Goglio, V., & Vera-Toscano, E. (2019). Cohort patterns in adult literacy skills: How are new generations doing? Journal of Policy Modeling, 41, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Foasberg, N. M. (2014). Student reading practices in print and electronic media. College & Research Libraries, 75(5), 705–723. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. González-Pérez, L. I., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2019). Innovation in education and technology integration. In Educational innovation trends (pp. 137–160). Ediciones OCTAEDRO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gusmuliana, P., Apriani, E., & Karolina, A. (2020). Learning media and English ability development. Jurnal Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Pendidikan, 1(1), 36–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Imam, O. (2016). Effects of reading skills on students’ performance. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(2), 177–186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kathleen, S., Slauson-Blevins, & Johnson, K. M. (2016). Doing gender, doing surveys? Women’s participation in surveys. Sociological Inquiry. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. MediaSmarts. (2022). Key concepts for digital media literacy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Otibar, J., Egargo, V., Calvara, C., Macion, K., Abrugar, S. M., Sanchez, A. S. Q., Danday, B. A., & Calzita, C. (2023). Social media exposure and grammar proficiency of junior high school students: A correlational study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(9), 3104–3115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2019). Functional literacy, education and mass media survey (FLEMMS). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schnaubert, L., & Rey, G. D. (2022). The Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in Digital Environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34(1) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Smart, A., & Jagannathan, S. (2018). Textbook policies in Asia: Development, publishing, printing, distribution, and future implications. Asian Development Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. UNESCO. (2014). Global citizenship education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Voivonta, T., & Avraamidou, L. (2018). Facebook: A potentially valuable educational tool. Educational Media International, 55(1), 34–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wright, J. C., & Huston, A. (2014). Early television viewing and school readiness. Child Development, 72(5), 1347–1366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zabidi, A. (2020). Teacher creativity in ICT-based learning media. INSPIRASI, 3(2), 128–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Zaphiris, P., & Ioannou, A. (2015). Learning and collaboration technologies. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Reading, Get Set, Go: A Digital Game-Based Intervention of Marungko Approach for Kindergarten Alphabet and Phonemic Awareness