The HOTS Approach to Teaching Understanding Culture, Society, and Politics: A Study of Pedagogy in Sociocultural Education

Authors

Jurich P. Mojello

Department of Education, Placer, Surigao del Norte (Philippines)

Rael Christopher O. Plaza

Graduate School, North Eastern Mindanao State University, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600377

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 5406-5411

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-13

Accepted: 2026-06-18

Published: 2026-06-24

Abstract

This research was conducted to analyze the implementation and effectiveness of teaching and learning Understanding Culture, Society and Politics (UCSP) using Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) approach. Specifically, it determined the extent to which Grade 11 teachers implemented HOTS, described the perceived effectiveness of HOTS-based instructional approaches in supporting students' UCSP learning, and tested whether HOTS implementation was significantly related to perceived instructional effectiveness. This study employed quantitative descriptive-correlational research design. Data were gathered from 327 Grade 11 students and 9 UCSP teachers from four public senior high schools in Placer, Surigao del Norte, Philippines. Using researcher-developed and validated survey questionnaires, the reliability coefficient for the student questionnaire was 0.95 and the teacher questionnaire was 0.96. Mean, verbal interpretation, and correlation analysis were used to analyze the data. Results showed that teachers often implemented HOTS-based instruction, with questioning technique and classroom discourse rated highest, while scaffolding of thinking processes was rated lowest. Students rated the HOTS-based instructional approaches as effective, while teachers strongly agreed that these approaches were effective. The association between frequency of HOTS implementation and perceived instructional effectiveness, however, was not significant. The results indicate that the effectiveness of HOTS pedagogy is not only based on the frequency of using the strategies, but also on the level of task design, scaffolding, integration of assessment and feedback for the learners.

Keywords

Higher-order thinking skills, UCSP, instructional effectiveness, sociocultural education

Downloads

References

1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green and Co. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brookhart, S. M. (2023). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom (2nd ed.). ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2025). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Education, Placer National High School District. (2023). Least learned competency report [Unpublished raw data]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education, Placer National High School District. (2024). Least learned competency report [Unpublished raw data]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education, Placer National High School District. (2025). Least learned competency report [Unpublished raw data]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hattie, J., & Donoghue, G. (2023). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 8(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00170-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lee, C. (2022). The HOTS facade: When activities masquerade as higher-order thinking. Journal of Educational Research, 115(4), 289-301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lian, L. H. (2023). Assessment of higher-order thinking skills: Is it simply determined by verbs? International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/16719 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Zaiful Shah, Z., & Zakaria, N. (2024). Teachers' beliefs and implementation of higher-order thinking skills in Malaysian classrooms: An exploratory study. International Journal of Instructional Pedagogy, 8(1), 45-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zhou, Y., Gan, L., Chen, J., Wijaya, T. T., & Li, Y. (2023). Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills assessment scale for pre-service teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, Article 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101272 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles