A Tree Conflict Analysis Model of the South China Sea Dispute between China and Vietnam
Authors
PhD Research Scholar, Department of Political Science, University of Delhi, and Research Associate at Visvaniti Foundation, New Delhi (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600520
Subject Category: International Relations
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 7448-7457
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-10
Accepted: 2026-06-15
Published: 2026-06-29
Abstract
Among the most disputed maritime regions in the world, the South China Sea (SCS) is considered to be one of the most contentious zones. By utilising a tree conflict analysis model to understand the disputed region, this paper aims to decipher the central conflict in the South China Sea between China and Vietnam, competing over sovereignty, maritime regions and marine resources. Firstly, the aim is to provide a historical understanding of the conflict between the two countries in the South China Sea and discuss the factors that have contributed to its escalation. In this attempt, the paper would highlight the major events that led to the intensification of the dispute between China and Vietnam while also underscoring the economic and strategic significance of the South China Sea that contributes to shaping the behaviour of the two states.
By utilising a qualitative methodology that examines the secondary sources such as official documents, policy briefs, legal documents and significant scholarly work on the subject, the paper draws its analyses from various sources. Most importantly, due attention is paid to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to examine its ability to address maritime disputes. While the efficacy of legal frameworks such as UNCLOS is significant, the study points to its limitations in its ability to resolve conflicts that are embedded in inconsistent interpretations of sovereignty. Lastly, this paper applies the tree conflict analysis model to decode the conflict between China and Vietnam in the South China Sea, which clearly demarcates between root causes, core problems and visible manifestations of the dispute and its impact on the states concerned. Although legal and diplomatic means for conflict management are important, the study concludes in its findings that a sustainable solution to the dispute lies in addressing the political and strategic factors that perpetuate the conflict, without which only short-term solutions are possible.
Keywords
South China Sea, UNCLOS, Tree Conflict Analysis, China-Vietnam Relations, Maritime Disputes, Paracel Islands, Spratly Islands, Maritime Security
Downloads
References
1. BBC. (2023, July 7). What Is the South China Sea Dispute? BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-13748349 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bhatt, P. (2024). Nine Dash Line. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chacko, J. E. C. (2016, February 18). Warming up of waters in the South China Sea. Indian Council of World Affairs. https://www.icwa.in/show_content.php?lang=1&level=3&ls_id=1818&lid=809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chung, C. (2016), “Drawing the U-Shaped Line: China’s Claim in the South China Sea, 1946–1974”, Vol 42 (1), Modern China, Sage Publications, New Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Congressional Research Service. (2022). U.S.-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas: Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from Congressional Research Service website: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R42784.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Council on Foreign Relations. (2023). Timeline: China’s Maritime Disputes. Retrieved from Council on Foreign Relations website: https://www.cfr.org/timeline/chinas-maritime-disputes [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Erbas, Y. (2022, April 11). The conflict in the South China Sea: A focus on a possible solution. Beyond the Horizon ISSG. https://behorizon.org/the-conflict-in-the-south-china-sea-a-focus-on-a-possible-solution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Erickson, A. and Wuthnow, J. (2016), “Barriers, Springboards and Benchmarks: ChinaConceptualizes the Pacific “Island Chains”, The China Quarterly. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1002513.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Hossain, Kamrul. “The UNCLOS and the US-China Hegemonic Competition Over the South China Sea.” Journal of East Asia and International Law (Seoul), vol. 6, no. 1, May 2013, https://doi.org/10.14330/jeail.2013.6.1.05. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kipgen, N. (2018). ASEAN and China in the South China Sea disputes. Asian Affairs, 49(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2018.1487691 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kojima, C. (2017). South China Sea arbitration and the protection of the marine environment: Evolution of UNCLOS Part XII through interpretation and the duty to cooperate. In Brill | Nijhoff eBooks (pp. 166–180). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004344556_010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Odeyemi, C. (2015). UNCLOS and maritime security: The "securitisation" of the South China Sea disputes. Defense & Security Analysis, 31(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2015.1101186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Shi, X. (2015). UNCLOS and China's claim in the South China Sea. Indo-Pacific Strategic Papers, Centre for Defence and Strategic Studies. https://web.archive.org/web/20180426011212/http://www.defence.gov.au/ADC/Publications/IndoPac/Shi_IPS_Paper.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Office of the Press Secretary. (2015, September 25). Remarks by President Obama and President Xi of the People's Republic of China in joint press conference, Rose Garden. The White House. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/25/remarks-president-obama-and-president-xi-peoples-republic-china-joint [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. South China Morning Post. (2018, May 19). China angers US after landing PLA Navy warplanes, including H-6K bomber, on South China Sea reef. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2146870/chinas-air-force-says-its-h-6k-strategic-bomber-took [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. South China Morning Post. (2018, April 6). US keeps close watch as Chinese Navy puts on show of force in live-fire South China Sea drills. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2140482/us-keeps-close-watch-chinese-navy-puts-show-force-live [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Swaine, M. (2015, July 23). America's security role in the South China Sea. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2015/07/americas-security-role-in-the-south-china-sea?lang=en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. The National Bureau of Asian Research. (2024, May). The South China Sea disputes and the evolution of the Vietnam-China relationship. https://www.nbr.org/publication/the-south-china-sea-disputes-and-the-evolution-of-the-vietnam-china-relationship [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- China in South Asia and South America: Connections, Intersections and Similarities
- Prospects and Impediments to China-Africa Sports Cooperation in the Contemporary Era
- Decolonising International Relations: African Perspectives on Global Justice - The Case of the Gambia in the International Court of Justice.
- Climate - Induced Displacement and its Implications on Human Security: A Case Study of Ghana
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) in Promoting and Protecting Local Industries in West Africa (2015 – 2024)