Productivity Enhancement of a Single-Slope Solar Still Using Square Hollow Tubular Fins and Paraffin-Wax Thermal Energy Storage: An Energy, Exergy and Economic Investigation
Authors
Mechanical Engineering Department, Gandhinagar Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar University, Moti Bhoyan, Gandhinagar 382721, Gujarat (India)
Mechanical Engineering Department, Gandhinagar Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar University, Moti Bhoyan, Gandhinagar 382721, Gujarat (India)
Mechanical Engineering Department, Gandhinagar Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar University, Moti Bhoyan, Gandhinagar 382721, Gujarat (India)
Mechanical Engineering Department, Gandhinagar Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar University, Moti Bhoyan, Gandhinagar 382721, Gujarat (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000193
Subject Category: Technology Marketing
Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 2691-2704
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-08
Accepted: 2026-06-13
Published: 2026-06-29
Abstract
Solar distillation offers a low-cost, decentralised route to potable water for off-grid communities, yet the low productivity of the conventional single-basin single-slope solar still (CSS) remains its principal limitation. This study experimentally investigates the simultaneous use of square hollow tubular fins and latent-heat thermal energy storage (TES) to enhance still productivity. Two geometrically identical 0.5 m² single-slope stills were fabricated and operated side by side at Ahmedabad, India (23°N), one retained as the CSS and the other progressively modified. The work was conducted in two phases. In Phase-1, the basin liner was fitted with 32 square hollow fins (20 mm × 20 mm), and paraffin wax (3 kg) was added beneath the liner as the TES medium. In Phase-2, the fins were extended below the liner into the storage chamber to raise the effective thermal conductivity of the wax. Performance was assessed through daily productivity, energy efficiency and exergy efficiency, supported by a validated thermodynamic model and an economic analysis. The optimum basin water depth was identified as 2 cm. Relative to the CSS, fins alone increased daily yield by 64.3%, while the combined fins-plus-TES configuration almost doubled the yield (+100.7%) and raised daily energy efficiency from 24% to 48%. Nocturnal output of the storage-integrated still reached about 5.3 times that of the CSS, and the exergy efficiency rose markedly during the night-time discharge cycle. Extending the fins into the storage chamber yielded a further 55.7% improvement over the CSS but only 4.8% over the above-liner configuration, indicating limited cost-effectiveness. The payback period fell from 144 days for the CSS to 81 days for the modified still. The results establish hollow-finned latent-heat storage as an effective and economical productivity-enhancement strategy for passive solar stills.
Keywords
Solar still; Thermal energy storage; Square hollow fins; Paraffin wax; Energy efficiency
Downloads
References
1. Agrawal, A., & Rana, R. S. (2019). Theoretical and experimental performance evaluation of single-slope single-basin solar still with multiple V-shaped floating wicks. Heliyon, 5(4), e01525. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Agrawal, A., Rana, R. S., & Srivastava, P. K. (2017). Heat transfer coefficients and productivity of a single slope single basin solar still in Indian climatic condition: Experimental and theoretical comparison. Resource-Efficient Technologies, 3(4), 466–482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ahsan, A., Imteaz, M., Rahman, A., Yusuf, B., & Fukuhara, T. (2012). Design, fabrication and performance analysis of an improved solar still. Desalination, 292, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Alaian, W. M., Elnegiry, E. A., & Hamed, A. M. (2016). Experimental investigation on the performance of solar still augmented with pin-finned wick. Desalination, 379, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Arunkumar, T., Vinothkumar, K., Ahsan, A., Jayaprakash, R., & Kumar, S. (2012). Experimental study on various solar still designs. ISRN Renewable Energy, 2012, 569381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Asbik, M., Ansari, O., Bah, A., Zari, N., Mimet, A., & El-Ghetany, H. (2016). Exergy analysis of solar desalination still combined with heat storage system using phase change material (PCM). Desalination, 381, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bose, P., & Valan, A. A. (2016). A review on thermal conductivity enhancement of paraffin wax as latent heat energy storage material. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 81–100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Dhaidan, N. S., & Khodadadi, J. M. (2017). Improved performance of latent heat energy storage systems utilizing high thermal conductivity fins: A review. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 9(3), 034103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Dincer, I., & Cengel, Y. A. (2001). Energy, entropy and exergy concepts and their roles in thermal engineering. Entropy, 3, 116–149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Dunkle, R. (1961). Solar water distillation: The roof type and a multiple effect diffusion still. International Developments in Heat Transfer, 805–902. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Elashmawy, M. (2017). An experimental investigation of a parabolic concentrator solar tracking system integrated with a tubular solar still. Desalination, 411, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. El-Sebaii, A. A., Al-Ghamdi, A. A., Al-Hazmi, F. S., & Faidah, A. S. (2009). Thermal performance of a single basin solar still with PCM as a storage medium. Applied Energy, 86(7–8), 1187–1195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. El-Sebaii, A. A., Ramadan, M. R. I., Aboul-Enein, S., & El-Naggar, M. (2015). Effect of fin configuration parameters on single basin solar still performance. Desalination, 365, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Holman, J. P. (2012). Experimental methods for engineers. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ismail, B. I. (2009). Design and performance of a transportable hemispherical solar still. Renewable Energy, 34(1), 145–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Kabeel, A. E. (2009). Performance of solar still with a concave wick evaporation surface. Energy, 34(10), 1504–1509. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kabeel, A. E., & Mohamed, A. (2016). Improving the performance of solar still by using PCM as a thermal storage medium under Egyptian conditions. Desalination, 383, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nayi, K. H., & Modi, K. V. (2018). Pyramid solar still: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Omara, Z. M., Hamed, M. H., & Kabeel, A. E. (2011). Performance of finned and corrugated absorbers solar stills under Egyptian conditions. Desalination, 277, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ouar, M. L. A., Sellami, M. H., Meddour, S. E., Touahir, R., Guemari, S., & Loudiyi, K. (2017). Experimental yield analysis of groundwater solar desalination system using absorbent materials. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 5, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Rajaseenivasan, T., Tinnokesh, A. P., Kumar, G. R., & Srithar, K. (2016a). Glass basin solar still with integrated preheated water supply — Theoretical and experimental investigation. Desalination, 398, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Rajaseenivasan, T., & Srithar, K. (2016b). Performance investigation on solar still with circular and square fins in basin with CO₂ mitigation and economic analysis. Desalination, 380, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Riahi, A., Yusof, K. W., Singh, B. S. M., Olisa, E., Sapari, N., & Isa, M. H. (2015). The performance investigation of triangular solar stills having different heat storage materials. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 6(4), 385–391. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Sakthivel, M., Shanmugasundaram, S., & Alwarsamy, T. (2010). An experimental study on a regenerative solar still with energy storage medium — Jute cloth. Desalination, 264, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Sarhaddi, F., Farshchi Tabrizi, F., Aghaei Zoori, H., & Mousavi, S. A. H. S. (2017). Comparative study of two weir type cascade solar stills with and without PCM storage using energy and exergy analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 133, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Sathyamurthy, R., Kennady, H. J., Nagarajan, P. K., & Ahsan, A. (2014). Factors affecting the performance of triangular pyramid solar still. Desalination, 344, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sharon, H., & Reddy, K. S. (2015). A review of solar energy driven desalination technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1080–1118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Sharshir, S. W., Elsheikh, A. H., Peng, G., Yang, N., El-Samadony, M. O. A., & Kabeel, A. E. (2017). Thermal performance and exergy analysis of solar stills — A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 521–544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Shatat, M., Worall, M., & Riffat, S. (2013). Opportunities for solar water desalination worldwide: Review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 9, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Shukla, S. K., & Sorayan, V. P. S. (2005). Thermal modeling of solar stills: An experimental validation. Renewable Energy, 30(5), 683–699. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Taamneh, Y., & Madhar, M. T. (2012). Performance of pyramid-shaped solar still: Experimental study. Desalination, 291, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Tabrizi, F. F., & Ashkan, Z. S. (2010). Experimental study of an integrated basin solar still with a sandy heat reservoir. Desalination, 253, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Tiwari, G. N., Dimri, V., & Chel, A. (2009). Parametric study of an active and passive solar distillation system: Energy and exergy analysis. Desalination, 242(1–3), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Velmurugan, V., Gopalakrishnan, M., Raghu, R., & Srithar, K. (2008a). Single basin solar still with fin for enhancing productivity. Energy Conversion and Management, 49, 2602–2608. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Velmurugan, V., Deenadayalan, C. K., Vinod, H., & Srithar, K. (2008b). Desalination of effluent using fin type solar still. Energy, 33(11), 1719–1727. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Xiao, X., Zhang, P., & Li, M. (2013). Preparation and thermal characterization of paraffin/metal foam composite phase change material. Applied Energy, 112, 1357–1366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Yadav, S., & Sudhakar, K. (2015). Different domestic designs of solar stills: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 718–731. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Zheng, H., Chang, Z., Chen, Z., Xie, G., & Wang, H. (2012). Experimental investigation and performance analysis on a group of multi-effect tubular solar desalination devices. Desalination, 311, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Zheng, H., Xiong, J., Xie, G., & Wang, H. (2013). Experimental and numerical study on a new multi-effect solar still with enhanced condensation surface. Energy Conversion and Management, 73, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]