Bridging Political Economy and Phenomenology: Ideology, Intentionality, and Material Structures in International Relations

International Relations (IR) continues to face a persistent analytical divide between material explanations of global politics and interpretive accounts of meaning, identity and agency. This article develops a conceptual bridge between political economy and phenomenology by asking how material structures become politically effective through socially organized meanings, and how actors experience political objects such as threat, security, development, legitimacy and responsibility. Using conceptual synthesis and critical theoretical reconstruction, the article rereads historical materialism, ideology and Brentano's intentionality as connected levels of analysis. The analysis shows that material structures do not operate as mechanical determinants. They become practically effective when institutions, expert systems and hegemonic vocabularies translate them into categories such as risk, stability and competitiveness. Ideology is therefore treated not only as misrepresentation but also as lived mediation: a patterned organization of attention, valuation and practical judgment. Brentano's concept of intentionality clarifies how political objects appear to actors as threats, obligations, opportunities or limits. The proposed framework links four moments: material structure, ideological mediation, intentional formation and IR practice. This framework helps explain the reproduction of global hierarchies, the durability of common sense in governance and the conditions under which counter-hegemonic alternatives become thinkable. Methodologically, the article recommends historical-institutional analysis, critical political economy mapping, discourse/category analysis, practice-oriented inquiry and process tracing across levels. It concludes that IR research can explain international politics more adequately when material power and lived sense-making are kept in the same analytical field. The contribution is a critical-phenomenological political economy that can guide theoretical debate and future empirical research on hegemony, crisis governance and institutional transformation

Political economy; phenomenology; intentionality; ideology; International Relations

1. Alleblas, J. (2024). Analyzing the role of values and ideals in the development of energy systems: How values, their idealizations, and technologies shape political decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00463-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aykut, S. C., & Maertens, L. (2022). The climatization of global politics: Introduction to the special issue. The climatization of global politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00325-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Azeez, G. K., & Symons, J. (2025). Seizing the means of innovation: On the relationship between Marxism and ecomodernism. Political Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Behravesh, M. (2025). Political psychology of revisionist behavior in world politics: State subjectivity, ontological (in)security, and Iranian foreign policy. lu.se [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bosse, G. (2022). Values, rights, and changing interests: The EU's response to the war against Ukraine and the responsibility to protect Europeans. Contemporary Security Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2099713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brand, U., Krams, M., Lenikus, V., & Schneider, E. (2022). Contours of historical-materialist policy analysis. Critical Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.1947864 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Carstensen, M. B., Ibsen, C. L., & Schmidt, V. A. (2022). Ideas and power in employment relations studies. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 61(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Di Paolo, E. A., & De Jaegher, H. (2022). Enactive ethics: Difference becoming participation. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-021-09766-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fletcher, R., Massarella, K., Ferraz, K. M., Kiwango, W. A., Komi, S., Mabele, M. B., & McInturff, A. (2023). The production-protection nexus: How political-economic processes influence prospects for transformative change in human-wildlife interactions. Global Environmental Change, 82, 102723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102723 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Franchini, A., Galasso, C., & Torero, J. L. (2024). Probabilistic performance-based fire design of structures: A hazard-centred and consequence-oriented perspective. Fire Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01541-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gelot, L., & Söderbaum, F. (2024). Legitimation struggles in international organizations: The case of the African Union. Globalizations. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2275819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hall, S. (2024). Culture, the media and the 'ideological effect'. In New Critical Writings in Political Sociology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003572923-19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hohmann, J., & Schwöbel-Patel, C. (2024). A monument to EG Wakefield: New and historical materialist dialogues for a posthuman international law. In International Law and Posthuman Theory (pp. 139-160). Routledge. https://doi.org/10453/171167/2/SSRN-id4382009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jacobetty, P., & Orton-Johnson, K. (2023). Blockchain imaginaries and their metaphors: Organising principles in decentralised digital technologies. Social Epistemology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2086086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kazakov, V. (2025). 'Sportswashing' as mediated deceit: Applying a critical disinformation model to address political (mis)communication through sports. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2025.2583973 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kuchinke, K. P. (2023). Phenomenology and human resource development: Philosophical foundations and implication for research. Human Resource Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221139352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Larres, P., & Kelly, M. (2023). A framework for authentic ethical decision making in the face of grand challenges: A Lonerganian gradation. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04974-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Livesey, M. (2025). Measurement = generative: Bridging IR's epistemological divides with quantum mechanics' measurement apparatus. European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661251388529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Müller, F. I. (2024). Captains of the sands: Urban illicit ecologies and sandscapes in Rio de Janeiro. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.13044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Najmaei, A., & Sadeghinejad, Z. (2023). Green and sustainable business models: Historical roots, growth trajectory, conceptual architecture and an agenda for future research - A bibliometric review of green business models. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04577-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Natarajan, N., Newsham, A., Rigg, J., & Suhardiman, D. (2022). A sustainable livelihoods framework for the 21st century. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Otto, F. E., Minnerop, P., Raju, E., Harrington, L. J., Stuart-Smith, R. F., Boyd, E., & Lauta, K. C. (2022). Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The role of the social superstructure narrative. Global Policy, 13(5), 736-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sakwa, R. (2024). The international system and the clash of world orders. China International Strategy Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-024-00163-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sevignani, S. (2024). Communicative activity: Social theoretical foundations for critical materialist media and communication sociology in the digital age. Critical Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241230246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Shang, W. (2022). The effects of job crafting on job performance among ideological and political education teachers: The mediating role of work meaning and work engagement. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148820 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Spano, N. (2024). Intentionality as tendency and intentionality as consciousness-of. Human Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09702-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sprenger, A. M. (2025). Listening at different scales: Sociolinguistic perception and the listening subject. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09702-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Suliman, S. (2022). Minimal hegemony in Sudan: Exploring the rise and fall of the National Islamic Front. Review of African Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2022.2077095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Vaassen, B. (2022). AI, opacity, and personal autonomy. Philosophy & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00577-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Vianna, M. T. (2023). Business cycle theories after Keynes: A brief review considering the notions of equilibrium and instability. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.12.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Weiss, T., & Fernandes, S. (2025). Foreign policy specialisation in EU small states: Conceptualising and analysing an underexplored practice. Journal of International Relations and Development, 28(4), 487-507. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-025-00358-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Weyland, K. (2022). How populism dies: Political weaknesses of personalistic plebiscitarian leadership. Political Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13277 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Winkel, M. (2025). Controlling the uncontrollable: The public discourse on artificial intelligence between the positions of social and technological determinism. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01979-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wunsch, N., & Blanchard, P. (2023). Patterns of democratic backsliding in third-wave democracies: A sequence analysis perspective. Democratization. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2130260 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ximenes, A. C., Cavanaugh, K. C., Arvor, D., Murdiyarso, D., Thomas, N., Arcoverde, G. F., & Van der Stocken, T. (2023). A comparison of global mangrove maps: Assessing spatial and bioclimatic discrepancies at poleward range limits. Science of the Total Environment, 860, 160380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160380 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zajontz, T. (2024). The political economy of China's infrastructure development in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44449-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Banditry as Political Economy: Violence, Extraction, and Subnational State-Building in Northwest Nigeria
• The Political Economy of Digital Economy in Nigeria and the Challenge of Underserved and Marginalised Communities: Interrogating the Prospects for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).
• The New Global Order Compared to Other World Orders: A Critical Analysis in International Political Economy
• China’s Investment in Africa: A Zimbabwe Case Study