Manifestations of Bayanihan in Social Media Posts During Natural Disasters A Content Analysis of Filipino Digital Communal Practices
Authors
College of Arts and Sciences, Saint Candida School - Hijas de Jesus, Inc. (Philippines)
Carlos Hilado Memorial State University (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600599
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 8569-8581
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-08
Accepted: 2026-06-13
Published: 2026-06-30
Abstract
This study employed qualitative content analysis to examine manifestations of bayanihan and social capital in Facebook posts during natural disasters. The study analyzed disaster-related posts from the 2025 and 2026 datasets to identify patterns of communal behavior in digital spaces. The analysis focused on five manifestations of bayanihan—resource sharing, volunteerism, mutual aid, collective action, and emotional support—and four dimensions of social capital—trust, reciprocity, social networks, and civic engagement. Findings reveal that bayanihan is strongly and consistently manifested in Facebook posts during disasters, with resource sharing and emotional support emerging as the most dominant forms across both datasets. Resource sharing was primarily expressed through the distribution of relief goods, financial assistance, food packs, shelter materials, and other essential resources by government agencies, humanitarian organizations, private groups, and individuals. Emotional support was equally pervasive, reflected in prayers, encouragement, and expressions of solidarity that reinforce collective resilience. Mutual aid and collective action were also prominent, demonstrating reciprocal assistance and coordinated multi-sectoral disaster responses. Volunteerism, though least frequent, remained a visible expression of civic duty and selfless service. In terms of social capital, social networks and civic engagement were the most dominant dimensions. Facebook functioned as a critical platform for connecting diverse actors, including communities, institutions, and organizations, thereby facilitating coordination and information exchange during crises. Civic engagement was evident in widespread participation in donation drives, relief operations, and volunteer activities. Trust was largely directed toward government agencies, humanitarian organizations, and response units, reflecting confidence in institutional capacity during emergencies. Reciprocity, though less frequently coded, was consistently expressed through gratitude and acknowledgment of assistance received, reinforcing norms of mutual obligation. Major themes of bayanihan in Facebook posts during natural disasters were revealed: community support through resource mobilization; solidarity and emotional resilience; collective responsibility and cooperation; and a culture of helping and reciprocity. The findings further showed that Social Capital Theory explains digital bayanihan through the presence of social networks, civic engagement, trust, and reciprocity, which facilitate coordination, participation, and mutual support during disasters.
Keywords
Bayanihan; social capital; Facebook posts; natural disasters; qualitative content analysis
Downloads
References
1. Adlit, M. F., & Martinez, M. R. (2023). Reliving the Bayanihan spirit: SPRCNHS Landayan annex narratives in the New Normal. Puissant, 4, 781-800. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-83683-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bhandari, A. & Bimo, S. (2022). “Why’s everyone on TikTok Now? The algorithmized self and the future of self-making on social media.” Social Media + Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bersamira, C. & Macaraeg, J. (2022). Advocacy and community building to address Filipino behavioral health. Hawaii Journal of Health & Social Welfare, 81(12), 338–340 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Borja, R. & Manzano, C. A. (2025). Reviving the spirit of bayanihan: Integrating Filipino values in teaching contemporary issues amidst modern challenges. Graduate Education Association of Public Higher Education Institutions Research Journal 1(1). DOI:10.65223/FAGA8384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hernandez, C. J. D., Gozum, I. E. A., & Delgado, C. A. (2024). Community pantry as a form of Bayanihan in the light of Albert Camus’ concept of rebellion. XLinguae, 17(3), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.18355/ xl.2024.17.03.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Houston, J.B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M.F., Park, E.H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M.R., Turner McGowen, S.E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J.A. and Griffith, S.A. (2015), Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Jang, S., Newman, G., Meyer, M., & Van Zandt, S. (2024). Social capital theory and quantitative approaches in measurements: disaster literature focus. Nat Hazards Rev., 25(3). doi: 10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Klinenberg, E. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help figh inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Crown. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Miasco, M. & Autida, G. (2025). Aristotle’s virtue of friendship and the relevance of Bayanihan system in the Philippines. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 5(5), 645-649. https://www.multiresearchjournal.com/admin/uploads/archives/archive-1758950162.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Reuter C, Kaufhold M-A. (2018). Fifteen years of social media in emergencies: A retrospective review and future directions for crisis Informatics. J Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26:41–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12196 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar