Simulation-Based Learning and Critical Thinking Skills as Predictors of Clinical Judgment among Nursing Students

Simulation-based learning has become an essential instructional strategy in nursing education because of its potential to enhance students' critical thinking and clinical judgment. This study aimed to determine the relationship among simulation-based learning, critical thinking skills, and clinical judgment in nursing students and to explore their lived experiences with simulation-based learning. An explanatory sequential mixed-method design was employed. The quantitative phase involved 216 third- and fourth-year nursing students selected through stratified random sampling from a higher education institution in Ozamiz City. Data were collected using questionnaires on simulation-based learning, critical thinking skills, and clinical judgment. Descriptive statistics, the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient, and multiple linear regression were used to analyze the quantitative data. The qualitative phase involved seven purposively selected nursing students who participated in in-depth interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative findings revealed that nursing students demonstrated high levels of simulation-based learning, critical thinking skills, and clinical judgment. Significant positive relationships were found between simulation-based learning and clinical judgment, and between critical thinking skills and clinical judgment. Furthermore, simulation-based learning and critical thinking skills significantly predicted clinical judgment among nursing students. Qualitative analysis generated four essential themes: Simulation as a Realistic Bridge Between Theory and Practice; Development of Critical Thinking and Clinical Judgment Through Active Decision-Making; Emotional Transformation Toward Confidence and Professional Growth; and Reflective Learning Through Debriefing and Collaboration. The essence of the lived experience revealed that simulation-based learning serves as a transformative educational process that bridges theory and practice while fostering critical thinking, clinical judgment, confidence, reflective learning, and professional growth. Simulation-based learning is a valuable pedagogical approach that enhances nursing students' preparedness for clinical practice. Nursing educators should enhance simulation-based learning through realistic clinical scenarios and structured debriefing to strengthen students’ critical thinking skills and clinical judgment.

simulation-based learning, critical thinking skills

1. “Effects of Experiential Learning Simulation-Based Learning Program on Clinical Judgment Among Obstetric Nursing Students.” (2024). Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 79, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2024.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Altinbas, B. C., Çalık, K. Y., Erdöl, E. K., Kırkbir, İ. B., Güner, S. G., & colleagues. (2025). The effect of simulation-based laboratory training on undergraduate nursing students’ clinical skill, satisfaction, and self-confidence. BMC Nursing, 24, 1322. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04004-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boso, C. M., van der Merwe, A. S., & Gross, J. (2021). Critical thinking skills of nursing students: Observations of classroom instructional activities. Nurse Education Today, 104, 104998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104998 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cant, R. P., McKenna, L., & Cooper, S. J. (2021). Simulation in nursing education: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104698 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Grant, V., Sherbino, J., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. (2021). Debriefing in simulation-based education. Medical Education, 55(4), 378–389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cheng, A., Kolbe, M., Grant, V., & Sherbino, J. (2021). Debriefing in simulation-based education: A systematic review. Medical Education, 55(4), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Effects of experiential learning simulation-based learning program on clinical judgment among obstetric nursing students. (2024). Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 92, 101553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101553 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Eppich, W., & Cheng, A. (2022). Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation debriefing. BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(1), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fang, F., Liu, D., & Zhang, M. (2024). Metacognitive processes and clinical decision-making in nursing education. BMC Medical Education, 24, 1530. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06467-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fegran, L., Ludvigsen, M. S., Aagaard, H., Uhrenfeldt, L., & Westergren, T. (2023). Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review. Nursing Open, 10(3), 1216–1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Foronda, C. L., Fernandez-Burgos, M., Nadeau, C., Kelley, C. N., & Henry, M. N. (2020). Virtual simulation in nursing education: A systematic review. Simulation in Healthcare, 15(1), 46–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Görücü, S., Türk, G., & Karaçam, Z. (2024). The effect of simulation-based learning on nursing students' clinical decision-making skills: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 140, 106270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Görücü, Y., Yılmaz, D. U., & Çelik, S. (2024). The effect of simulation-based learning on nursing students’ clinical judgment and decision-making skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 137, 106188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Høegh-Larsen, T., Lio, M. M., & Hall-Lord, M. L. (2023). Comparing PEARLS debriefing and standard debriefing on nursing students’ clinical judgment and learning outcomes. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 74, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2022.10.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jawabreh, N. (2024). The relationship between emotional intelligence and clinical decision-making among nursing students. SAGE Open Nursing, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241272459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jeffries, P. R., McNelis, A. M., & Wheeler, C. A. (2021). Simulation as a learning strategy in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 60(5), 243–249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jeon, M. K., & Han, S. J. (2020). Relationships among critical thinking disposition, clinical competence, and clinical judgment in nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 59(7), 385–389. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20200617-06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kantek, F., & Yildirim, N. (2022). Clinical decision-making and nursing students’ clinical judgment performance: A correlational study. Nurse Education in Practice, 63, 103386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kim, H. J., & Choi, E. Y. (2024). Self-regulation and reflective thinking as predictors of clinical judgment among nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 24, 512. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05123-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kim, J., Park, J. H., & Shin, S. (2022). The effect of simulation fidelity on nursing students’ learning outcomes. Nurse Education Today, 109, 105256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2022). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lasater, K., & Nielsen, A. (2021). Clinical judgment development in nursing students: A review of simulation-based learning. Journal of Nursing Education, 60(9), 485–492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mishra, S., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2022). Technology integration and workload challenges among nursing educators in higher education. Nurse Education Today, 118, 105518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Molina-Rodríguez, A., Jiménez-García, C., & Martínez-Riera, J. R. (2023). Nursing students’ perceptions of simulation-based learning and reflective debriefing: A mixed-method study. BMC Nursing, 22, 352. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01499-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Molina-Rodríguez, A., Suárez-Cortés, M., Leal-Costa, C., Ruzafa-Martínez, M., Díaz-Agea, J. L., Ramos-Morcillo, A. J., & Jiménez-Ruiz, I. (2023). Including audience response systems in debriefing: A mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning. BMC Nursing, 22(353). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01499-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Morris, T. H., Rohs, M., & Perry, R. (2021). Self-regulated learning, reflective practice, and clinical judgment in nursing education: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(11), 4358–4372. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14989 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Shin, H., Kim, Y., & Kang, J. (2023). The relationship between self-regulation, reflective thinking, and clinical judgment among nursing students. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1187654. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1187654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Shin, S., Park, J. H., & Kim, J. (2023). Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 140, 104456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Son, H. K. (2023). Effects of simulation combined with problem-based learning on clinical reasoning and clinical judgment among nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 23, 684. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04567-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Son, H. K. (2023). Effects of simulation with problem-based learning (S-PBL) on nursing students’ clinical reasoning ability: Based on Tanner’s clinical judgment model. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 601. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04567-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Lai, K. W. (2021). Developing technology integration and instructional productivity among health educators. Computers & Education, 165, 104149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wang, H., Li, X., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Metacognitive processes and self-regulation as predictors of clinical judgment among nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 24, 847. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06467-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wang, L., Chen, Y., & Xu, H. (2023). Digital technology use and work-related stress among nurse educators: Implications for work-life balance. Nurse Education Today, 125, 105809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yang, S. Y., Kim, M. J., & Lee, H. Y. (2024). Effects of integrated virtual and face-to-face simulation on nursing students’ clinical judgment and learning outcomes. BMC Medical Education, 24, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04988-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Knowledge and Attitude of Undergraduate Nursing Students towards Organ Donation
• Cold Hip Bath Therapy for Labor Pain Management: A Review of Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Women's Health
• Work Settings Utilizing the S.C.O.R.E Model on the Psychological Empowerment of Hospital Nurses in Cebu City
• An Assessment on the Quality of Life of PLHIV Residents in Digos City Barangays: Basis for Health Teaching Program
• Work-Related Stress and Its Psychodermatological Impact on Nursing Professionals