Evaluating AI in Academic Libraries: A Systematic Literature Review on User Perceptions, Acceptance Factors and Service Effectiveness

Authors

Fatin Diyanah Mohd Fauzan

Faculty of Science Information, University Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Selangor (Malaysia)

Nurul Fasihah Nadzirah Zulkarnain

Faculty of Science Information, University Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Selangor (Malaysia)

Mohd Razilan Abdul Kadir

Faculty of Science Information, University Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Selangor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600697

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 9939-9946

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-11

Accepted: 2026-06-16

Published: 2026-07-03

Abstract

This study presents a systematic literature review examining the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic libraries, focusing on three main dimensions: user perception, factors influencing technology acceptance, and service effectiveness. Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, a thorough search was conducted in four major academic databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Emerald Insight, and Science Direct, using the search string "Artificial Intelligence" AND "Academic Library" AND "Effectiveness" AND "User Perception" AND "Acceptance." The initial search yielded 1,435 articles, which were then filtered based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in a final analysis of 30 peer-reviewed studies published between 2024 and 2026. Quality assessment was carried out using criteria set for systematic literature reviews. The study's findings show that users' perceptions of AI in academic libraries are marked by excitement about increased efficiency in academic activities, along with concerns about accuracy, transparency, and reduced human interaction. Key factors influencing AI adoption include perceived usefulness, ease of use, trust in AI technology, algorithm literacy, and compatibility with existing library processes. Transformational leadership and institutional support emerge as critical organizational enablers for successful AI adoption. Service effectiveness analysis shows improvements in information retrieval, user support, and overall service functions, although challenges remain with complex queries and system integration. This review also identifies major barriers in terms of organizational, financial, and technical aspects in implementing AI, including inadequate infrastructure, high costs, insufficient training programs, and a lack of clear institutional policies. Ethical considerations, especially intellectual property rights, data privacy, algorithmic bias, and AI hallucinations, remain significant challenges. This review provides a comprehensive framework for understanding AI usage in academic libraries and offers actionable recommendations for library administrators, policymakers, and researchers.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, academic libraries, user perceptions, technology acceptance, service effectiveness

Downloads

References

1. Adewojo, A. A., Olatunji, O. M., & Olalere, P. M. (2025). Effects of AI-driven tools on reference services and staff roles in academic libraries. Reference Services Review, 54(1), 15–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-02-2025-0008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, I., Warraich, N. F., & Butt, K. (2026). Is generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) trustable among LIS students? A study of ChatGPT using the stimuli-organism-response framework. The Electronic Library, 44(2), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-04-2025-0160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amin, S. M. R. U., Reza, R. B., & Mahmud, M. R. (2026). Biblio: building an AI-powered chatbot for library resource discovery – a practitioner case study. Library Hi Tech News. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2026-0042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Durodolu, O. O., & Adigun, G. O. (2026). Analysing the adoption of Artificial Intelligence in modern library services: a Technology Acceptance Model perspective. Em Questão, 32, e-148462. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-5245.32.148462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Elsayed, A. M., & Abusharhah, M. M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence adoption, perceptions, and ethical literacy among Arab academic librarians: A survey. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(5), Article 103083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fruehauf, E., Schmidt, L., & Boczar, A. (2026). User perspectives on LINK: A generative AI chatbot for academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 52, Article 103255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Guo, R., Pang, Y., Xu, Y., Liu, Z., Chen, Y., & Guo, Y. (2025). Application of artificial intelligence technologies in library services at the top 100 US universities. The Electronic Library, 43(4), 619–648. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2024-0386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Haris, M., Ansari, A. J., Malik, B. A., Lund, B. D., & Ali, N. (2025). Artificial intelligence in academic libraries: a survey of users' perception and adoption. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-09-2024-0585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hu, Y.-H., Hsieh, C.-L., & Salac, E. S. N. (2024). Advancing freshman skills in information literacy and self-regulation: The role of AI learning companions and Mandala Chart in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50, Article 102885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jin, H. (2025). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Knowledge Management in Academic Libraries: A Framework for Enhancing Information Retrieval Efficiency and User-Centred Service Delivery. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17387818 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kavak, A. (2025). Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into academic library services: user opinions in Türkiye. Reference Services Review, 53(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-06-2024-0037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kisilowska-Szurminska, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in academic libraries – a tool, a collaborator, an adversary? A Delphi study of university librarians in Poland. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51, Article 103114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Liu, G., & Liu, S. (2026). Chatbots for reference services in academic libraries: Applications and trends. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 52, Article 103197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Liu, X., Wang, Q., Gan, D., & Yang, G. (2025). Application of artificial intelligence technology in personalized information literacy teaching in university library subject services. In Proceedings of the 2025 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Future Education (AIFE 2025) (pp. 1–5). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3785987.3786011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lu, H., & Li, X. (2026). Factors influencing users' attitudes towards intelligent chatbots in Chinese academic libraries: the role of algorithm literacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, Article 85. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06392-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Luo, J., & Brissett, A. (2025). Assessing unstructured data from virtual reference chats: A machine learning approach to understanding patron needs during COVID-19. Library & Information Science Research, 47(2), Article 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101344 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mallikarjuna, C. (2024). An analysis of integrating artificial intelligence in academic libraries. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 44(2), 95–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Michalak, R., Gandhi, R., Maia, P., & Ellixson, D. (2026). Curating institutional memory in academic libraries: AI, metadata, and student-led digital archiving & storytelling. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 52, Article 103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Moiseeva, N. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence technologies in information and library systems [Tekhnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta v informatsionno-bibliotechnykh sistemakh]. Scientific and Technical Libraries, 5, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2024-5-85-101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Molaudzi, A. I., & Ngulube, P. (2025). Use of artificial intelligence innovations in public academic libraries. IFLA Journal, 51(3), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352241301718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mosha, N. F. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence tools in enhancing accessibility and usability of electronic resources in academic libraries. Library Management, 46(1/2), 132–157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-08-2024-0088 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Oladokun, B. D., Atuase, D., Tachie-Donkor, G., Mosweu, T. L., & Gaitanou, P. (2026). University libraries in the age of generative AI: Perceptions and usage among students in developing countries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 52, Article 103253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103253 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Oladokun, B. D., Enakire, R. T., Okai, E. D. J., & Owolabi, K. A. (2025). The double-edged sword of AI: librarians' perceptions of job displacement and polarization. Library Management, 43(5), 818–836. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-03-2025-0045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Pawar, V. M. (2024). Using AI in academic libraries: Application and challenges. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(5), 2745–2752. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY2120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N., & Naccache, H. (2024). Leadership styles and AI acceptance in academic libraries in higher education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50, Article 102849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Shimray, S. R., Subaveerapandiyan, A., & Ahmad, N. (2025). Digital transformation in academic libraries: e-resources, OPACs and AI in information discovery. Reference Services Review, 53(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-12-2024-0078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sousa, N. M. T., & Fujita, M. S. L. (2025). Accessibility and digital inclusion in academic libraries: the role of artificial intelligence. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 24, e8679700. https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v24i00.8679700/en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tshabalala, N. (2025). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on library services: Reflections on a practical project. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yeung, R. S. K., Tian, R., Chiu, D. K. W., & Choi, S. P.-M. (2025). University students' perceptions on how generative artificial intelligence shape learning and research practices: A case study in Hong Kong. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51, Article 103082. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zipf, S. T., Petricini, T., & Borrelli, S. (2025). 'I shouldn't be saying this': Library-based student confessions about AI, cheating, and academic integrity. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(2), Article 103125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles