African Political Thought and Global Justice: Contributions to Debates on Reparations, Resource Sovereignty, and Climate Ethics
Authors
Department of History Education, Isaac Jasper Boro College of Education, Sagbama, Bayelsa State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600704
Subject Category: History
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 10027-10033
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-11
Accepted: 2026-06-16
Published: 2026-07-03
Abstract
African political thought has emerged as one of the most significant intellectual traditions contributing to contemporary debates on global justice. Rooted in anti-colonial struggles, Pan-Africanism, indigenous philosophies, and postcolonial critiques, African political thought challenges historical and structural inequalities embedded within the international system. Using data derived from secondary sources, and adopting the use of the Postcolonial theory and Pan-Africanism as theoretical frameworks, this paper demonstrates that African political thought enriches global justice discourse by foregrounding questions of historical redress, collective responsibility, communal well-being, and ethical governance. This paper examined how African political thinkers and traditions contribute to global discussions on reparations, resource sovereignty, and climate ethics. The study reveals that Africa’s experiences of slavery, colonialism, economic exploitation, and environmental degradation have generated unique perspectives on justice that extend beyond conventional Western liberal theories. In debates on reparations, African scholars and political leaders emphasize historical accountability, restitution, and transformative justice as necessary mechanisms for addressing the enduring legacies of colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade. Regarding resource sovereignty, African political thought critiques neo-colonial economic structures and advocates for equitable control of natural resources as a prerequisite for genuine development and self-determination. In the realm of climate ethics, African perspectives highlight historical responsibility, ecological justice, intergenerational obligations, and the disproportionate vulnerability of African societies to climate change despite their minimal contribution to global emissions. The paper concludes that global justice cannot be fully realized without incorporating African perspectives into international policy-making and philosophical debates. Such inclusion offers a more comprehensive and equitable framework for addressing contemporary global inequalities and environmental challenges.
Keywords
African Political Thought, Global Justice, Reparations, Resource Sovereignty, Climate Ethics
Downloads
References
1. African Union Agenda 2063 Aspirations [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. African Union Foundation Agenda 2063 Overview [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. African Union. (2025). AU theme of the year 2025: Justice for Africans and people of African descent through reparations. African Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Asiedu, M., Dieng, A., Haykel, I., et al. (2024). The case for globalizing fairness: A mixed methods study on colonialism, AI, and health in Africa. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Barrett, T., Okolo, C. T., Biira, B., Sherif, E., Zhang, A. X., & Battle, L. (2025). African Data ethics: A discursive framework for black decolonial data science. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Behrens, K. G. (2012). Moral obligations towards future generations in African thought. Journal of Global Ethics, 8(2–3), 179–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Brown, H. (2025). CARICOM-African Union is an essential alliance for realising the reparations claim. CARICOM Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. CARICOM Reparations Commission. (2014). CARICOM ten point plan for reparatory justice. Georgetown: CARICOM Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Colonialism Reparation. (2026). African Union working for reparations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Densu, K. (2018). Omenala: Toward an African-centered ecophilosophy and political ecology. Journal of Black Studies, 49(1), 31–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth. Grove Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Fomekong, S. T. (2025). Framing reparations for historical injustices: The normative and strategic potential of the African Union Transitional Justice Policy. African Human Rights Yearbook, 9, 279–315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Graness, A. (2013). What is global justice? Henry Odera Oruka's contribution to the current debate. Journal on African Philosophy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Graness, A. (2015). Is the debate on global justice a global one? Some considerations in view of modern philosophy in Africa. Journal of Global Ethics, 11(1), 126–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gutema, B. (2013). Global justice and African philosophy. Journal on African Philosophy, 8. Available at: Journal on African Philosophy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Lauer, H. (2017). Global justice as process: Applying normative ideals of indigenous African governance.” Philosophical Papers, 46(1), 163–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mbembe, A. (2001). On the postcolony. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mbembe, A. (2018). How to think the world? Achille Mbembe on race, democracy and the African role in global thought. Constellations, 25(3), 497–506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mohamed, S., Png, M. T., & Isaac, W. (2020). Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Nkrumah, K. (1965). Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. London: Thomas Nelson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Nkrumah, K. (1965). Neo-colonialism: The last stage of imperialism. Thomas Nelson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ojeh, V. N., & Nicodemus, J. B. (2025). Integrating indigenous knowledge and traditional African governance into climate policy: Legal and strategic implications. Environmental Ethics & Law. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Reuters. (2025). “Rising populism should not stop discussions on reparations, says African Union Official.” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Reuters. (2025). African leaders to push for slavery reparations despite resistance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Reuters. (2025). COP30 urged to link climate justice with reparations for historical crimes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Reuters. (2025). Enough talk, time for action, CARICOM official says on slavery reparations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Wittmann, N. (2017). Reparations—Legally justified and sine qua non for global justice, peace and security. Global Justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric, 9(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Agarwood: A Fragrant Link between India and Southeast Asia
- Pens of Protest: Malayalam Press in the Freedom Struggle
- Long-Term Trends of Temperature and Rainfall in Sivakasi: A Climatic Assessment (1980–2025)
- Iran’s Forgotten Friend William Morgan Shuster: Victim of Anglo-Russian Conspiracy
- The (Moordkop) Murder Hill Massacre 1830: A Historical Analysis of the Griqua-Ndebele Conflict