Ethnochemistry-Based Learning Packet on Traditional Tausug Soap-Making: Effects on Grade 9 Students’ Chemistry Learning and Cultural Appreciation

Authors

Adzriana S. Jariun

Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology Department of Science and Mathematics Education College of Education (Philippines)

Edna B. Nabua

Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology Department of Science and Mathematics Education College of Education (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600797

Subject Category: Chemistry

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 11414-11421

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-03

Accepted: 2026-06-08

Published: 2026-07-06

Abstract

Chemistry is often perceived as difficult due to its abstract concepts and limited connection to students’ everyday experiences. To address this challenge, this study developed and evaluated an ethnochemistry-based learning packet integrating traditional Tausug soap-making into chemistry instruction. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the learning packet in improving Grade 9 students’ chemistry learning and cultural appreciation. A one-group pretest-posttest design with qualitative support was employed involving thirty-five (35) Grade 9 students in one public school in Jolo, Sulu during the School Year 2025–2026. The learning packet was developed using the ADDIE instructional design model and underwent expert validation prior to implementation. Data were collected through a 15-item for pre-test and post-test, activity scores, and a perception questionnaire. Descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation were utilized, while the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was employed to determine significant differences between pre-test and post-test scores. Results revealed that students demonstrated high performance in the learning activity, with most obtaining Outstanding and Very Satisfactory ratings. Findings further showed a significant improvement after exposure to the learning packet with the computed W-value of 0.00 was lower than the critical value of 195, indicating a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores. Therefore, the null hypothesis stating that there is no significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the students is rejected. Moreover, students expressed highly positive perceptions of the instructional material, obtaining a grand mean of 3.79, interpreted as Strongly Agree. The findings indicate that integrating indigenous knowledge and cultural practices through ethnochemistry-based learning packet can effectively enhance students’ conceptual understanding of chemistry while promoting appreciation of local cultural heritage. The study recommends the integration of ethnochemistry and culturally responsive approaches in science instruction to foster meaningful and contextualized learning experiences.

Keywords

hnochemistry, Tausug traditional soap-making, learning packet

Downloads

References

1. Aikenhead, Glen S., & Masakata Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(3), 539–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9067-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32. https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/Bruner.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ferreira, D. M., Sentanin, F. C., Parra, K. N., Bonini, V. M. N., de Castro, M., & Kasseboehmer, A. C. (2022). Implementation of inquiry-based science in the classroom and its repercussion on the motivation to learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 578–591. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press. ISBN: 9780807739549. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gecolea, C. M. B., & Amon, M. F. L. E. (2022). The use of contextualized activities on acquisition of chemistry concepts in science. International Journal on Research in STEM Education, 4(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijrse.v4i2.1051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jegede, O. J. (1995). Collateral learning and the eco-cultural paradigm in science and mathematics education in Africa. Studies in Science Education, 25(1), 97–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269508560051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365 2729.1991.tb00230.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Picardal, M. T., & Sanchez, J. M. P. (2022). Effectiveness of contextualization in science instruction to enhance science literacy in the Philippines: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 140 156. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2001). Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098237X(200101)85:1<6::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-R [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles