Implementing the MATATAG Curriculum in Social Studies: Experiences, Challenges, and Pedagogical Adaptations of Teachers

The MATATAG Curriculum—formally adopted through Department of Education Order No. 013, Series of 2023—represents the most significant revision to the Philippine basic education curriculum since the K-12 reform of 2013, introducing a substantially decongested content framework, restructured Araling Panlipunan scope and sequence, and a strengthened emphasis on foundational competencies and values formation across all grade levels. As MATATAG moved from policy into classroom practice during the 2024-2025 school year, teachers—particularly those in geographically isolated, resource-constrained, and disaster-affected regions such as Eastern Visayas—became the primary mediators of curriculum change, translating ambitious national policy intentions into the daily realities of their classrooms with limited preparation time, uneven professional development support, and instructional material shortages. This qualitative case study explored the experiences, challenges, and pedagogical adaptations of Social Studies teachers implementing the MATATAG Curriculum in Eastern Visayas public secondary schools. Informed by Fullan's (2007) theory of educational change, Ball et al.'s (2012) policy enactment framework, and Shulman's (1986) Pedagogical Content Knowledge construct, the study engaged eighteen (18) purposively selected Social Studies teachers from public secondary schools across the six provinces of Eastern Visayas through in-depth semi-structured interviews, lesson plan document analysis, and focus group discussions. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke (2006). Six core themes emerged: (1) navigating the MATATAG transition without adequate preparation; (2) decongestion experienced as liberation and loss simultaneously; (3) the Araling Panlipunan restructuring and its pedagogical implications; (4) resource misalignment between curriculum intent and classroom reality; (5) locally adaptive curriculum enactment strategies; and (6) the MATATAG curriculum and teacher professional identity reconstruction. Implications for curriculum implementation policy, teacher professional development, and Social Studies education in Eastern Visayas are discussed.

MATATAG Curriculum, Social Studies education, Araling Panlipunan, curriculum implementation, Eastern Visayas, qualitative case study, curriculum change, pedagogical adaptation

1. Alcazar, J. T., & Domingo, M. R. (2024). Early MATATAG implementation in Visayas Region VII Social Studies classrooms: A preliminary survey of teacher experiences. Philippine Social Studies Education Journal, 12(1), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bhaskar, R. (1989). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences (2nd ed.). Harvester Wheatsheaf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America's schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Education (DepEd). (2023a). Department Order No. 013, Series of 2023: Adoption of the MATATAG K–10 Curriculum. DepEd-Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Education (DepEd). (2023b). MATATAG: The revised K–10 curriculum framework and rationale. DepEd-Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Education Regional Office VIII. (2024). Eastern Visayas MATATAG curriculum rollout implementation report: SY 2024–2025, First Semester. DepEd RO VIII. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jansen, J., & Christie, P. (Eds.). (1999). Changing curriculum: Studies on outcomes-based education in South Africa. Juta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). (2023). Eastern Visayas: 2023 regional social and economic indicators. PSA-Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sy, R. A., & Bautista, E. C. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum perceptions among Metro Manila Social Studies teachers: A preliminary survey. Philippine Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tababa, G. L., Ramirez, A. D., & Manaois, J. O. (2019). K–12 Araling Panlipunan curriculum implementation: Experiences of public secondary school teachers in Western Visayas. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 8(1), 45–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Talisayon, V. M., Santos, R. A., & Dela Cruz, M. L. (2022). Teaching during the pandemic: Experiences of faculty in Eastern Visayas state universities. Journal of Higher Education Research, 7(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. World Bank. (2021). Philippines learning poverty brief. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Influence of Korean Drama to Cultural Identity of Students in One Private School
• Children’s Vulnerability in Coastal Slums during Cyclone: A Case Study of Puri Municipality Area
• Mitigating Youth Restiveness Through Social Studies Education: Implications for Institutional Stability, Civic Responsibility, and Student Empowerment in Nigeria
• Students’ Awareness of Sexual Harassment Forms at Campus II, University of Labor and Social Affairs
• Influence of Social Studies Curriculum Content on Youth Restiveness and Civic Responsibility Among Secondary School Students in Nigeria