Determinants of Smallholder Maize Productivity in Western Kenya: Evidence From a Post Harvest Plot Level Survey

In developing agrarian economies, smallholder maize production serves as a critical pillar for rural livelihoods and national food security, yet conventional agricultural interventions consistently struggle to close persistent yield gaps. While structural policy frameworks heavily prioritize upstream input distribution, the systemic interplay between field-level management, post-harvest preservation, and empirical data accuracy remains poorly understood. Smallholder maize productivity in sub-Saharan Africa remains substantially below biological potential; Bungoma County in Western Kenya exemplifies this yield gap. This cross-sectional study examined agronomic and socio-economic factors associated with maize yield among 400 systematically sampled households using a post-harvest, plot-level survey. A thirteen-item Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) score was constructed (mean = 5.15/13; SD = 1.68) and decomposed into production and post-harvest sub-indices. Yield was measured on a six-category ordinal scale (<6 to ≥30 bags per acre). Ordinal logistic regression models were estimated alongside alternative specifications, including ordered probit models and wealth controls, to evaluate the robustness of identified yield determinants. Improved storage was the only predictor consistently associated with higher reported yield across all specifications. The post-harvest GAP sub-index correlated positively with yield (OR = 1.282, p = 0.033), whereas the production sub-index lacked statistical significance. Wealth was also positively associated with yield after adjusting for agronomic practices (OR = 1.206, p = 0.035). These findings suggest that post-harvest management significantly influences reported productivity in recall-based surveys. They further highlight the necessity of distinguishing between harvested production and grain retained after storage. Consequently, agricultural policy should pivot from a narrow focus on seed and fertiliser subsidies toward improving post-harvest infrastructure and localized storage technologies.

Maize Productivity; Good Agricultural Practice; Post-Harvest Management; Yield Gap; Smallholder Agriculture

1. Affognon, H., Mutungi, C., Sanginga, P., & Borgemeister, C. (2015). Unpacking postharvest losses in sub-Saharan Africa: A meta-analysis. World Development, 66, 49–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aramburu-Merlos, F., Tenorio, F. A. M., Mashingaidze, N., Sananka, A., Aston, S., Ojeda, J. J., & Grassini, P. (2024). Adopting yield-improving practices to meet maize demand in Sub-Saharan Africa without cropland expansion. Nature Communications, 15, Article 4492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Carletto, C., Jolliffe, D., & Banerjee, R. (2013). The emperor has no data! Agricultural statistics in sub-Saharan Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(2), 195–208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. De Groote, H., Muteti, F. N., & Bruce, A. Y. (2023). On-farm storage loss estimates of maize in Kenya using community survey methods. Journal of Stored Products Research, 102, Article 102107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. FAOSTAT. (2023). Maize area and production statistics for Kenya. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gourlay, S., Kilic, T., & Lobell, D. (2017). Could the debate be over? Errors in farmer-reported production and their implications for the inverse scale-productivity relationship in Uganda. Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 8192. The World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hengl, T., Miller, M. A. E., Križan, J., Shepherd, K. D., Sila, A., Kilibarda, M., Antonijević, O., Glušica, L., Dobermann, A., Haefele, S. M., McGrath, S. P., Acquah, G. E., Collinson, J., Parente, L., Sheykhmousa, M., Saito, K., Johnson, J.-M., Chamberlin, J., Silatsa, F. B. T., … Crouch, J. (2021). African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. Scientific Reports, 11, Article 6130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kassie, M., Jaleta, M., Shiferaw, Bekele., Mmbando, F., & Mekuria, M. (2013). Adoption of interrelated sustainable agricultural practices in smallholder systems: Evidence from rural Tanzania. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 525–540. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B., & Muricho, G. (2011). Agricultural technology, crop income, and poverty alleviation in Uganda. World Development, 39(10), 1784–1795. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kibet, P. K., Mugwe, J. N., Korir, N. K., Mucheru-Muna, M. W., Ngetich, F. K., & Mugendi, D. N. (2023). Granular and powdered lime improves soil properties and maize (Zea mays L.) performance in humic Nitisols of central highlands in Kenya. Heliyon, 9(6), Article e17286. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kisinyo, P. O., Othieno, C. O., Gudu, S. O., Okalebo, J. R., Opala, P. A., Maghanga, J. K., Ng'etich, W. K., Agalo, J. J., & Opile, W. R. (2014). Immediate and residual effects of lime and phosphorus fertiliser on soil acidity and maize production in western Kenya. Experimental Agriculture, 50(1), 128–143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. KNBS. (2019). Kenya Population and Housing Census, Volume I: Population by county and sub-county. Nairobi: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kostandini, G., La Rovere, R., & Abdoulaye, T. (2013). Potential impacts of increasing average yields and reducing variability of maize yields in Africa. Food Policy, 43, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G., & Field, C. B. (2009). Crop yield gaps: Their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 42(2), 109–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Munialo, S., Dahlin, A. S., Onyango, M. C., Oluoch-Kosura, W., Marstorp, H., & Öborn, I. (2020). Soil and management-related factors contributing to maize yield gaps in western Kenya. Food and Energy Security, 9(1), Article e189. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Opala, P. A., Odendo, M., & Muyekho, F. N. (2018). Effects of lime and fertiliser on soil properties and maize yields in acid soils of Western Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(13), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2018.13066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ouma, J. O., De Groote, H., & Owuor, G. (2006). Determinants of improved maize seed and fertiliser use in Kenya: Policy implications [Conference paper]. International Association of Agricultural Economists Annual Meeting. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/25433/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sheahan, M., & Barrett, C. B. (2017). Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy, 67, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sheahan, M., & Barrett, C. B. (2017). Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy, 67(C), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sida, T. S., Baudron, F., Dilla, A. M., Abdulkadir, A., & Giller, K. E. (2021). Implications of intra-plot heterogeneity for yield estimation accuracy: Evidence from smallholder maize systems in Ethiopia. Field Crops Research, 267, Article 108147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tefera, T., Mugo, S., & Likhayo, P. (2011). Effects of insect population density and storage time on grain damage and weight loss in maize due to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais and the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(10), 2249–2254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Temesgen, T., & Getu, E. (2023). Comparing maize storage technologies for managing post-harvest loss in Bako, Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology, 9(3), 054–058. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Tittonell, P., & Giller, K. E. (2013). When yield gaps are poverty traps: The paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Research, 143, 76–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wossen, T., Abdoulaye, T., Alene, A., Feleke, S., Menkir, A., & Manyong, V. (2017). Measuring the impacts of adaptation strategies to drought stress: The case of drought tolerant maize varieties. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
• Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
• Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
• Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
• The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District