Navigating the Spectrum of Police Behavior: Transformational Leadership and Legitimacy in Fostering Internal Regulatory Compliance

Studies on police behavior are often caught up in the "extreme polar syndrome," focusing too much on either serious crimes (such as corruption) or extreme volunteerism that violates policies, such as Prosocial Rule Breaking (PSRB). This tendency has led the mainstream literature to overlook the most critical aspect of organizational governance: mandatory compliance with daily disciplinary rules. Thus, this narrative review aims to map the spectrum of police behaviors and highlight the empirical gap regarding compliance behavior among law enforcement officers. The article search was conducted across major databases, namely Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, using a specific search string method to ensure comprehensive literature retrieval. The results of the synthesis classify policing behavior into two main spectrums. First, the Non-Compliance Spectrum, which includes four lenses: (1) Integrity Violations and Criminal Deviance, (2) Sociocultural Non-Compliance, (3) Bureaucratic Manipulation, and (4) Prosocial Deviance / Prosocial Rule Breaking. Second, the Compliance Spectrum, which consists of three lenses: (5) Instrumental Compliance, (6) Normative Compliance, Legitimacy and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), and (7) Value-Driven Performance Compliance. This study concludes that, to sustainably maintain work discipline within the Royal Malaysia Police (RMP) force in line with the provisions of the internal regulation, namely the Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations 1993 [P.U. (A) 395], enforcement institutions must shift from a purely punitive approach toward an approach rooted in Legitimacy Theory. Hence, Transformational Leadership is proposed as the ideal mechanism to inculcate moral values, build procedural fairness, and stimulate voluntary compliance among police officers.

Police Behavior, Regulatory Compliance, Transformational Leadership

1. Abique, J. R. (2024). Components of Transformational Leadership vis-à-vis Employee Engagement among Police Officers in Angeles City. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(IIIS), 1969–2006. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803143S [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, M. H. F. M., & Ahamat, A. (2025). Transformational and Innovative Leadership in the Royal Malaysia Police (RMP): A Path Toward Modern Policing. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(9), 4410–4421. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9090000361 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. AlSabah, N. (2025). Leadership Styles and Perceptions in Policing: Evidence from Kuwait’s Police Stations. Asian Journal of Criminology, 20(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-025-09459-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amrulloh, M. A. G., & Nurcholis, L. (2025). Improving Performance through Transformational Leadership and Learning Culture with Work Environment as a Mediating Variable. Jurnal Riset Bisnis Indonesia, 22(2), 337–354. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anggraini, R., & Johannes, S. (2024). How Transformational Leadership and Competency Supporting Employee Performance: Role of Achievement Motivation as Mediation. Asean International Journal of Business, 3(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.54099/aijb.v3i1.830 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The Normalization of Corruption In Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bandura, A. (1971). Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (Second Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Borian, I. H., Huam, H. T., & Yasin, I. M. (2024). The Relationship between Full-Range Leadership Styles and Police Integrity. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(9), 2009–2022. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i9/23021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bozeman, B. (2022). Rules Compliance Behavior: A Heuristic Model. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvab028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Brahim, M., Hussin, M. M., Ismail, M., & Mohamad, M. (2021). Kesedaran Pegawai dan Anggota Polis Diraja Malaysia Tentang Integriti dalam Penyampaian Perkhidmatan. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(9), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i9.1024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Byun, G., & Lee, S. (2021). Social learning in empowering leadership: A moderated mediation analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Charbonneau, É., Boisvert, Y., & Bégin, L. (2023). Rule Breaking, Bending, and Workarounds: Police Officers and Chiefs’ Coercion-Discretion of Enforcing State Executive Orders. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(3), 536–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2162940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dobel, J. P. (1990). Integrity in the Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 354–366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Donkor, F. (2022). Do Transformational Leaders Affect Employee Performance and Normative Commitment Through General Self-Efficacy? Analysis in Ghanaian Public Sector Organizations. Public Organization Review, 22(3), 707–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00531-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Filstad, C., Karp, T., & Glomseth, R. (2020). How Police Leaders Learn to Lead. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 14(3), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pay043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gempesao, M. C., Nabe, N. C., Chavez, C. B., & Magbojos, R. R. (2023). Transformational Leadership of Police Commissioned Officers and Service Engagement of Non-Commissioned Personnel: The Mediating Role of Personal Ethics. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i7.4882 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gjinovci, A., & Gjinovci, D. (2026). Favoritism Practices, Nepotism, and Corruption in Public Administration: Impacts on Employment, Meritocracy, Efficiency, and Institutional Trust. An Institutional and Governance Perspective in Transitional Public Sectors. European Journal of Management, Economics and Business, 3(2), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejmeb.2026.3(2).15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hapsari, D., Riyanto, S., & Endri, E. (2021). The Role of Transformational Leadership in Building Organizational Citizenship: The Civil Servants of Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 0595–0604. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.0595 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hertogh, M. (2023). Relational legal consciousness in the punitive welfare state: How Dutch welfare officials shape clients’ perceptions of law. Cambridge University Press, 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12663 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hodgkinson, G. P., & Ford, J. K. (2015). What makes excellent literature reviews excellent? A clarification of some common mistakes and misconceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S1–S5. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1983 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Huberts, L. W. J. C., Kaptein, M., & Lasthuizen, K. (2007). A study of the impact of three leadership styles on integrity violations committed by police officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30(4), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510710833884 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Isaeva, E., Seki, M., & Kakinaka, M. (2026). Leader and Peer Influence: Unraveling the Impact of Ethical and Unethical Behaviors on Civil Servants’ Motivation in the Kyrgyz Republic. International Journal of Public Administration, 49(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2025.2464831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam. (1993). Peraturan-Peraturan Pegawai Awam (Kelakuan dan Tatatertib) 1993 [P.U. (A) 395]. Kerajaan Malaysia. https://docs.jpa.gov.my/docs/pu/pua395.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Latupono, A. Z., & Wibowo, M. (2025). The Role of organizational culture in moderating the effect of transformational leadership On job satisfaction of police members. The Journal of Academic Science, 2(5), 1350–1361. https://doi.org/10.59613/78E2FA25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mbago, M., Ntayi, J. M., & Muhwezi, M. (2016). Compliance to Acts, Rules and Regulations: Evidence From Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Public Procurement, 16, 374–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-16-03-2016-B006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Modise, J. M. (2023). Efficient and Effective Leadership in Law Enforcement, Characteristics and Behaviors of Effective Police Leaders that Assists Upholding A High Standard of Professionalism and Integrity. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(9), 2096–2112. www.ijisrt.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Modula, M. J., Mathapo-Thobakgale, E. M., Nyoni, C. N., & Jansen, R. (2024). Strategies for Coping with Occupational Trauma: A Scoping Review of the Police Officer Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070921 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal, 339, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mphidi, A. J., & Pheiffer, D. C. (2025). Corruption and moral degradation within the Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department. African Security Review, 34(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2025.2457646 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nasir, N. S. M., Zain, M. H. M., Shahzada, M. R., Khalifa, G. S. A., & Mokhtar, M. Y. (2025). The Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Law Enforcement: An Islamic Leadership Perspective. GJAT, (Special Issue), 230–255. http://jurnal.usas.edu.my/gjat/index.php/journal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nasir, N. S. M., Zain, M. H. M., Shahzada, M. R., & Ning, Z. (2024). The Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Among Law Enforcement Officers in Malaysia. Journal of Business Innovation, 9(1), 163–176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nor, N. M., & Ishak, S. (2023). Gaya Kepimpinan Transformasi dan Transaksi Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Konteks Berkepatuhan Tinggi. E-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2001.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Pozzobon, T., & Scott, S. (2024). Bridging the divide: Exploring inequities between sworn and civilian leaders in a Canadian police service. International Journal for Leadership in Learning, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/ijll47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Quah, J. S. T. (2014). Curbing police corruption in Singapore: lessons for other Asian countries. Asian Education and Development Studies, 3(3), 186–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2014-0029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rahmah, L., Himam, F., Riyono, B., & Nurcahyo, A. (2021). The Implementation of The Work Ethics Dynamics at The Police Corps (Exploration Study on Unethical Behavior). Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 9(1), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i1.517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Satriya, I. B., Suswati, E., Mulyono, S., & Haritsar, Y. (2025). The Influence of Transformational Leadership and Work Motivation on Police Personnel Performance Mediated by Work Discipline. Jurnal Administrare: Jurnal Pemikiran Ilmiah Dan Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran, 12(2), 118–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Shaffril, H. A. M., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality and Quantity, 55(4), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Shi, H. (2024). The Impacts of Guanxi: Drug Policing Under Police Professionalisation in China. Sociological Research Online, 29(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804231177501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sija, A. (2023). The Effect of Integrity Compliance on Task Performance in the Royal Malaysia Police. European Journal of Human Resource Management Studies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejhrms.v6i2.1461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Tyler, T. R. (2025). Legitimacy-based policing. Criminology and Public Policy, 24(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12695 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Tyler, T. R., Goff, P. A., & MacCoun, R. J. (2015). The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(3), 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615617791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. van Rooij, B., Fine, A., Shalvi, S., Feldman, Y., Scheper, E., Yunmei, W., Leib, M., Cheng, Q., & Wanhong, Z. (2024). The obligation to obey the law: exploring National Differences. Crime, Law and Social Change, 82(2), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10148-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Wang, S.-Y. K., Sun, I. Y., Wu, Y., Van Craen, M., & Kuen-Lung Hsu, K. (2020). Does trust in supervisors translate to compliance and cooperation? A test of internal procedural justice among Taiwanese police officers. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 53(3), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865820917996 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Weißmüller, K. S., De Waele, L., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2022). Public Service Motivation and Prosocial Rule-Breaking: An International Vignettes Study in Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(2), 258–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20973441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Wolff, J. N. (2025). Is It Going Above and Beyond or Breaking the Rules? How Clients’ Identities, Perceived Deservingness, and Outcomes Affect Citizens’ Judgments of Bureaucrats’ Rule Decisions. Public Administration, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Yunus, Z. Z., & Burhan, N. A. S. (2023). Faktor Pelanggaran Integriti Organisasi: Kajian Kes Terhadap Anggota Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) di Kontinjen Selangor. E-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2002.25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Zarghamifard, M., & Danaeefard, H. (2020). What drives leader integrity? International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 14(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2020.104685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
• Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
• Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
• Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
• Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions