Socio-Cultural Factors Influencing the Uptake of Modern Contraceptive Among Women of Reproductive Age (15 - 49 Years) in Kawama and Mukobeko Township Area, Kabwe District, Zambia

Authors

Monde Sooka

Master of Social Work Student at Mulungushi University, School of Social Sciences, Department of Social Development Studies, Kabwe (Zambia)

Nsala Mauzu

Mulungushi University, School of Social Sciences, Department of Social Development Studies, Kabwe (Zambia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600922

Subject Category: Social Work

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 13106-13119

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-21

Accepted: 2026-06-26

Published: 2026-07-08

Abstract

Background: Modern contraceptives are essential for improving maternal health outcomes, reducing unintended pregnancies, promoting child spacing, and lowering maternal mortality. Despite increased awareness and expansion of family planning services in Zambia, uptake of modern contraceptives remains inconsistent in many peri-urban communities due to persistent socio-cultural barriers. This study investigated socio-cultural factors influencing the uptake of modern contraceptives among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Kawama and Mukobeko townships of Kabwe District, Zambia.

Keywords

Contraceptive uptake, modern contraceptives, peri-urban communities, socio-cultural factors, women of reproductive age

Downloads

References

1. Abeid, R.A., Sumari, E.I., Qin, C., Lyimo, A.A. and Luttaay, G.A. (2022). ‘Uptake of modern contraceptives among women of reproductive age in Chake District’. PLOS ONE, 17(6), pp. 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adongo, P. (2020). ‘Cultural perceptions and reproductive decision-making among women in Sub-Saharan Africa’. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 24(3), pp. 45-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. African Population and Health Research Center [APHRC] (2021). Barriers to modern contraceptive use in Africa. Nairobi: African Population and Health Research Center Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ajzen, I. (1991). ‘The theory of planned behavior’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), pp. 179-211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barden-O’Fallon, J. and Speizer, I.S. (2011). ‘What differentiates method stoppers from switchers? Contraceptive discontinuation and switching among Honduran women’. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 37(1), pp. 16-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bolarinwa, O.A., Nwagbara, U.I., Okyere, J., Ahinkorah, B.O., Seidu, A.-A. and Ameyaw, E.K. (2021). ‘Prevalence and predictors of long-acting reversible contraceptive use among sexually active women in 26 Sub-Saharan African countries’. International Health, 14(5), pp. 492-500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods, 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chola, M., Hlongwana, K. and Ginindza, T.G. (2023). ‘Understanding adolescent girls’ experiences with accessing and using contraceptives in Zambia’. BMC Public Health, 23(1), Article 2149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Eshak, E. (2020). ‘Myths about modern and traditional contraceptives held by women in Minia, Upper Egypt’. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 26(4), pp. 417-425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 5th edition. London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gebeyehu, A., Asnake, M., Dibaba, Y., Setegn, T., Yirga, M., Teklu, A.M. and Tura, G. (2018). ‘Barriers to utilisation of long acting reversible and permanent contraceptive methods in Ethiopia: A systematic review’. Ethiopian Journal of Reproductive Health, 10(3), pp. 1-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kazibwe, J., Masiye, F., Klingberg Allvin, M., Ekman, B. and Sundewall, J. (2024). ‘Inequality in modern contraceptive use and unmet need for contraception among women of reproductive age in Zambia: A trend and decomposition analysis, 2007-2018’. Reproductive Health, 21(1), Article 181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mutombo, N. and Bakibinga, P. (2018). ‘Understanding barriers to contraceptive use in Zambia’. BMC Public Health, 18(1), pp. 137-148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, 11th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sedgh, G. and Hussain, R. (2020) ‘Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women with unmet need’. Studies in Family Planning, 51(2), pp. 107-125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Silumbwe, A., Nkole, T., Munakampe, M.N., Milford, C., Cordero, J.P., Kriel, Y., Zulu, J.M. and Steyn, P.S. (2018). ‘Community and health systems barriers and enablers to family planning and contraceptive services provision and use in Kabwe District, Zambia’. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), Article 390. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2022). World Family Planning 2022. New York: United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd edition. New York: Harper and Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zambia Statistics Agency (ZamStats), Ministry of Health (MOH), and ICF (2024). Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2024: Key Indicators Report. Rockville, MD: ICF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles