Implications of the Triple Code Model in Mathematics Education

Mathematics education has vital role in enhancing logical reasoning, quantitative thinking, and problem-solving skills in order to make daily life easier and pave the way for further scientific discoveries. However, despite all its significance, many students continue to face problems when it comes to comprehending mathematical notions. Conventional approaches to education are based on repeated practice which is unlikely to take into consideration the neurological aspects of math learning. The recent paper focused neurocognitive theory of Triple Code Model (TCM) for numerical cognition, proposed by Stanislas Dehaene (1992). As per neurocognitive theory of TCM, there are three representational systems used in processing numbers: auditory-verbal code, visual Arabic code, and analog magnitude code. Further, the paper examines how integration among symbolic and non-symbolic representations contributes to arithmetic development and mathematical understanding. The study also highlights the role of paired-associate learning, neurocognitive remediation, and multi-representational instruction in fostering mathematics learning. The paper concludes that mathematics instruction should move beyond rote procedural practice toward cognitively informed and neuroscience-based pedagogical approaches.

Triple Code Model (TCM), mathematical cognition, mathematics education

1. Callaman, R. A., & Tagaytay, F. M. M. (2025). Exploring resilience mechanisms in high school mathematics: A study on problem-solving challenges and self-regulation. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 13(5), 1237–1252. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.5708 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1102–1118). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1–2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-N [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1(1), 83–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Skagenholt, M., Träff, U., Västfjäll, D., & Skagerlund, K. (2018). Examining the Triple Code Model in numerical cognition: An fMRI study. PLOS ONE, 13(6), e0199247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Malone, S. A., Heron-Delaney, M., Burgoyne, K., & Hulme, C. (2019). Learning correspondences between magnitudes, symbols and words: Evidence for a triple code model of arithmetic development. Cognition, 187, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Camilla Gilmore. (2023). Understanding the complexities of mathematical cognition: A multi-level framework. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(9), 1953–1972. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231175325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kochari, A., Bremnes, H. S., & Szymanik, J. (2025). Numerical cognition across the lifespan: A selective review of key developmental stages and neural, cognitive, and affective underpinnings. Cortex, 187, 190–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Núñez-López, J. A., Molina-García, D., González-Fernández, J. L., & Fernández-Suárez, I. (2024). Enhancing the acquisition of basic algebraic principles using algebra tiles. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(7), em2473. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Odic, D., & Starr, A. (2018). An introduction to the Approximate Number System. Child Development Perspectives, 12(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12288 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jung, H. S., & Song, H. S. (2022). A study on longitudinal relationship with academic stress, math self-efficacy, and math class engagement: Using auto regressive cross-lagged model. The Mathematical Education, 61(2), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2022.61.2.359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Grabner, R. H., Ansari, D., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neuper, C. (2009). To retrieve or to calculate? Left angular gyrus mediates the retrieval of arithmetic facts during problem solving. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 604–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ünal, Z. E., Ala, A. M., Kartal, G., Özel, S., & Geary, D. C. (2023). Visual and symbolic representations as components of algebraic reasoning. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 9(2), e11151. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.11151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sokolowski, H. M., Matejko, A. A., & Ansari, D. (2023). The role of the angular gyrus in arithmetic processing: A literature review. Brain Structure and Function, 228(1), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02594-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fritz, A., et al. (2025). Numerical cognition across the lifespan: A selective review of key developmental stages and neural, cognitive, and affective underpinnings. Cortex, 184, 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2025.01.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Vogel, S. E., Goffin, C., & Ansari, D. (2015). Developmental specialization of the left parietal cortex for the semantic representation of Arabic numerals: An fMR-adaptation study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2014.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Vogel, S. E., & De Smedt, B. (2021). Developmental brain dynamics of numerical and arithmetic abilities. npj Science of Learning, 6(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00099-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44(3), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Whitehead, H. L., & Hawes, Z. (2023). Cognitive foundations of early mathematics: Investigating the unique contributions of numerical, executive function, and spatial skills. Journal of Intelligence, 11(12), 221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. a. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11120221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59–72). Kluwer Academic Publishers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rockhill, A. P., Tan, H., Lopez Ramos, C. G., Nerison, C., et al. (2024). Investigating the Triple Code Model in numerical cognition using stereotactic electroencephalography. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0313155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Delazer, M., Domahs, F., Bartha, L., Brenneis, C., Lochy, A., Trieb, T., & Benke, T. (2003). Learning complex arithmetic: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 18(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Shum, J., Hermes, D., Foster, B. L., Dastjerdi, M., Rangarajan, V., Winawer, J., Miller, K. J., & Parvizi, J. (2013). A brain area for visual numerals. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(16), 6709–6715. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4558- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. 12.2013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Schneider, M., Beeres, K., Coban, L., Merz, S., Schmidt, S. S., Stricker, J., & De Smedt, B. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3), e12372. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12372 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Whitacre, I., Henning, B., & Atabaş, Ş. (2020). Disentangling the research literature on number sense: Three constructs, one name. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 95–134. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319899706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Siemann, J., & Petermann, F. (2018). Evaluation of the Triple Code Model of numerical processing—Reviewing past neuroimaging and clinical findings. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 72, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Duricy, E. T. (2023). Investigating the relationship between the neural basis of math and language using the lesion method (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh). University of Pittsburgh. https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (n.d.). Make It Count: Maths and Indigenous learners. https://mic.aamt.edu.au/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. (2025). In Richard E. Mayer, Patricia A. Alexander, & Logan Fiorella (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Hemispheric specialization in mental arithmetic: Insights from functional transcranial Doppler sonography. (2026). Brain and Cognition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Linköping University Library. (2026). Search for publications in DiVA. Retrieved June 19, 2026, from https://liu.diva-portal.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. John Wiley & Sons. (2026). Wiley Online Library. Retrieved June 20, 2026, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. KU Leuven Libraries. (2026). Lirias: Leuven Institutional Repository and Information Archiving System. Retrieved June 20, 2026, from https://lirias.kuleuven.be [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tübingen University Library. (2026). Online publication system of the University of Tübingen. Retrieved Ju 20, 2026, from https://publikationen.uni-tuebingen.de [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Academy Publication. (2026). Welcome to Academy Publication! Retrieved June 20, 2026, from https://www.academypublication.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (2026). PME-NA. Retrieved June 20, 2026, from pmena.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples