Strategic Partnership Management Leadership in Island Schools in the State of Sabah, Malaysia

Strategic partnership is a critical element of organisational management in ensuring effective governance and sustainable educational development, particularly in island schools in the state of Sabah, Malaysia, which face geographical isolation, limited resources, and restricted access to external support. This study aims to explore the leadership of school leaders in managing strategic partnerships. The study involved five informants comprising head teachers serving in island schools. The interview protocol was developed based on the Malaysian Education Quality Standard (MEQS Quality@School) Standard 2: Organisational Management, Aspect 2.7: Strategic Partnerships. A qualitative interview-based approach was employed to collect data. The interview transcripts were analysed using ATLAS.ti software. The findings indicate that effective and efficient leadership in managing strategic partnerships ensures systematic organisational activities, empowerment of subordinates, the development of cohesive teams, and the creation of a harmonious working environment to achieve organisational goals and direction. Furthermore, this study provides valuable contributions to the education system, particularly in the development of management and leadership modules for island schools, serving as an important reference across all levels of education.

Leadership, school leaders, management, strategic partnerships, island schools

1. Al Muz-Zammil, Y., & Moong, S. K. (2010). The role of parents in Parent–Teacher Associations (PIBG) in Chinese national-type schools in Kulai, Johor. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Christina Andin, Abdul Said Ambotang, Yusri Kamin, & Rohan Hamzah. (2019). Transforming school environments through school–community partnerships in rural areas. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 15(2), 84–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dexter, S., Vincent, P., & Dennis, L. (2020). Leadership competencies of island school principals in the state of Sabah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(12), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Epstein, J. L. (2002). Family, school, and community connections. Encyclopedia of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Epstein, J. L., & Sanders, M. G. (2006). Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family and community partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 81–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Epstein, J. L. (2009). Six types of involvement: Keys to successful partnerships. Johns Hopkins University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2007). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gross, J. M. S., Haines, S. J., Hill, C., Francis, G. L., Blue-Banning, M., & Turnbull, A. P. (2015). Strong school–community partnerships in inclusive schools are “part of the fabric of the school—We count to them”. School Community Journal, 25(2), 9–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gulson, B. K. (2013). Best practices of parent partnerships in special education programmes from teachers’ perspectives (Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Halimah, A. M., Eow, Y. L., & Chuah, B. E. (2017). Parental and community involvement in strengthening schools. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319794654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Institut Aminuddin Baki. (2020). Standard Kompetensi Pemimpin Sekolah Malaysia 2.0 (KOMPAS 2.0). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jemaah Nazir dan Jaminan Kualiti. (2024). Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia (SKPM Kualiti@Sekolah). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah). 1, 1–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kamus Dewan. (2007). Kamus Dewan (4th ed.). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mohamed Sani Ibrahim, Saedah Siraj, & Norlidah Alias. (2014). Effective homework management. University of Malaya Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pang, V., & Lajium, D. (2014). Assessment in education. Universiti Malaysia Sabah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Roslena Mansor, & Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah. (2015). Quality leadership: Perspectives on competencies required for effective leadership. Jurnal Pengurusan, 45, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sainah, L., Norman, S., Kadir, A., Aminuddin, I., Annilin, A., Salleh, I. K., & Abdul Ghani, S. (2024). Leadership of school leaders in island school organisational management. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sheldon, S. B. (2015). Moving beyond monitoring: A district leadership approach to school, family, and community partnerships. In S. B. Sheldon & E. M. Kim (Eds.), Family-school partnerships in context. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Siti Aliah, I., Muhamad Suhaimi, T., & Jamaluddin, M. A. (2016). School–community partnerships in education: The role of transformational leadership and principal communication. International Conference on Postgraduate Research Proceedings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Siti Hajar Man. (2018). Creative collaboration between schools and communities: Connecting focal points of TS25 schools. National Seminar on Educational Management and Leadership. Institut Aminuddin Baki. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vaughan, C. (2017). The influence of school leadership on student outcomes. Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria