Cultural Heritage Product Design as an Alternative Investment Asset in Southeast Asia
Authors
Faculty of Art & Design, University Technology MARA Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, 08400 Merbok, Kedah (Malaysia)
Faculty of Art & Design, University Technology MARA Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, 08400 Merbok, Kedah (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0427
Subject Category: Cultural Continuity
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 5813-5825
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-21
Accepted: 2026-06-26
Published: 2026-07-12
Abstract
This conceptual study examines the potential of cultural heritage product design as an alternative investment asset within Southeast Asia’s contemporary creative economy. Despite the increasing commercialization of heritage-based products and growing interest in alternative investments, limited studies have explored how cultural heritage value, design innovation, and market appreciation collectively contribute to investment potential. This study develops a conceptual framework through a systematic review and synthesis of recent literature, supported by Cultural Capital Theory, Creative Economy Theory, and Product Semantics Theory. The analysis suggests that cultural heritage value, traditional craftsmanship, symbolic meaning, and contemporary design innovation may enhance consumer perception, market relevance, and long-term economic value. Drawing upon secondary evidence from recent literature and creative economy reports, the study argues that heritage-based products possess characteristics associated with alternative investment assets, including authenticity, scarcity, cultural significance, and commercial value. The proposed framework provides a foundation for future empirical investigations while offering practical insights for designers, cultural entrepreneurs, investors, and policymakers involved in heritage-based product development.
Keywords
embody craftsmanship, provenance, and cultural narratives
Downloads
References
1. ASEAN. (2021). ASEAN creative economy development framework. ASEAN Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2025). Cultural and creative satellite account 2024. Department of Statistics Malaysia. Department of Statistics Malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Dhar, B. K., Chawla, U., & Mulchandani, D. (2025). Sustainable craft culture: Socio-cultural drivers and economic impact on sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 3023–3042. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3282 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Gilson, L. L., & Goldberg, C. B. (2015). Editors’ comment: So, what is a conceptual paper? Group and Organization Management, 40(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115576425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Hendriyana, H., Mustaqin, K., Desanto, D., & Widodo. (2024). Harmonizing local and global wisdom in the design of environmentally friendly, fashionable, and sustainable craft products. Environment Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(SI23), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI23.6149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hendriyana, H., Rachmadi, G., Kudya, K., & Jahada, C. A. P. (2025). Revitalizing traditional crafts: Bridging cultural heritage and innovation in Indonesia's creative economy. Mudra: Jurnal Seni Budaya, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v40i3.3234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hui, G., Aris, A., & Pu, C. (2025). Craftsmanship revitalized: Revival path of intangible heritage in modern life and cultural sustainability. Environment Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 10(31), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10i31.6488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Krippendorff, K., & Butter, R. (1984). Product semantics: Exploring the symbolic qualities of form. Innovation, 3(2), 4–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Liaoanshun, & Banerjee, S. (2024). Exploring cultural sustainability through the integration and innovation of traditional crafts with contemporary design. Prestieesci Research Review, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Syafri, W. (2023). Creative economy and cultural commercialization in Southeast Asia. Journal of Creative Economy Studies, 8(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. UNCTAD. (2024). Creative economy outlook 2024. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNCTAD Official Website [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Zbuchea, A. (2022). Traditional crafts: A literature review focused on sustainable development. Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, 2(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/csep-2022-0002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]