Determinants of Consumer Boycott Intention in Malaysia: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour

Authors

Nurul Farhana Nasir

Department of Accountancy and Business, Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology, Perak Branch (Malaysia)

Mohamad Aidil Hasim

Department of Accountancy and Business, Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology, Johor Branch (Malaysia)

Muhammad Faiz Nasir

Department of Accountancy and Business, Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology, Perak Branch (Malaysia)

Muhammad Nur Firdaus Nasir

Faculty of Graphic Design & Media Digital, Universiti Teknologi MARA Melaka (Malaysia)

Muhammad Arif Nasir

Faculty of Business, Hospitality and Technology, Universiti Islam Melaka (Malaysia)

Asmawati Sajari

Faculty of Management and Information Technology, Universiti Sultan Azlan Shah, Perak (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601110

Subject Category: Marketing

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 15877-15886

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-24

Accepted: 2026-06-29

Published: 2026-07-13

Abstract

The growing trend of consumer boycotts reflects increasing awareness of ethical, humanitarian, and social issues among consumers, particularly in emerging markets such as Malaysia. This study aims to examine the factors influencing Malaysian consumers’ intention to engage in boycott behaviour by applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). Specifically, the study investigates the effects of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control on boycott intention. A quantitative research design was employed using a cross-sectional survey approach. Data were collected from Malaysian consumers aged 18 years and above through a structured questionnaire, with items adapted from established literature. A pilot study confirmed the reliability of the measurement scales, with Cronbach’s alpha values exceeding the recommended threshold of 0.70. Multiple regression analysis revealed attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control have significant positive effects on boycott intention. Among these, perceived behavioural control emerged as the strongest predictor, followed by subjective norms and attitude. The findings indicate that consumers are more likely to engage in boycott behaviour when they perceive greater ability and resources to do so, alongside social support and favourable evaluations. This study contributes to the literature by validating the applicability of TPB in explaining boycott behaviour in the Malaysian context. Practically, the results suggest that enhancing consumers’ perceived capability and leveraging social influence are crucial in encouraging boycott participation. Future research is recommended to incorporate additional variables and adopt longitudinal designs to further understand consumer boycott behaviour.

Keywords

Consumer Boycott Intention, Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), Perceived Behavioural Control.

Downloads

References

1. Abdul Shukor, S., & Emhemad Tariki, H. (2019). The Factors Influencing Consumers’ Willingness To Boycott Among Malaysıan Muslim Youth. In M. Imran Qureshi (Ed.), Technology & Society: A Multidisciplinary Pathway for Sustainable Development, 62. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 319-330. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.05.02.31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of Planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alias A. S. N., Mohamed, N. H., & Mohamad, M. (2024). Riding the Gaza Boycott Wave: A Strategic Guide for Malaysian Franchises. Global Business & Management Research, 16(3S), 138-149. https://www.gbmrjournal.com/pdf/v16n3s/V16N3s-11.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Khatib, J. A. (2020). Testing the Theory of Planned Behavior in geopolitical consumer boycotts: The role of perceived behavioral control, animosity, and self-efficacy. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(4), 312–325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arsad, M. I. (2025). Selective Boycott as Collective Action: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review on Shariah Legitimacy and Legal Boundaries in Malaysia. Journal of Law & Governance, 8(1), 16-30. https://ejournal.unimel.edu.my/index.php/JLG/article/view/2138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chiang, L. F., & Arif, A. M. M. (2024). The Intention to Participate in the Boycott Movement among University Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(10), 1932-1944. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i10/23307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0231055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hamzah, H., & Mustafa, H. (2019). Exploring consumer boycott intelligence towards Israel-related companies in Malaysia: An integration of the theory of planned behaviour with transtheoretical stages of change. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(1), 208-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2017-0070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Harun, N. F. A., Azami, N., Ab Rahim, R., & Ramli, F. (2024). The role of social media, voice of boycott, and boycott intention in shaping boycott behavior among Malaysian students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 14(7), 112–128. https://hrmars.com/ijarbss/article/view/26373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Harun, A., Prybutok, V., & Sandikci, Ö. (2021). The effects of religiosity and attitude on consumer boycotts: A structural equation modeling approach in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(5), 1012–1031. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hasim, M. A., Jabar, J., & Murad, A. M. (2019). Preliminary research on consumer acceptance in nanofood towards purchase intention: Pilot research. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2S3), 352-356. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1060.0782S319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hasim, M. A., Jabar, J., Sufian, A., & Ibrahim, N. F. (2022). Validating the component of e-learning antecedents, digital readiness and usage behavior towards e-learning performance: A pilot study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 178-194.https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hasim, M. A., Kosnandi, S. N., Wei, V. W. M., Isa, N. A. M., Rosli, M. S., Nasir, N. F., & Ibrahim, N. F. Adopting ChatGPT for Academic Assistance among University Students: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(2), 7451-7460. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200535 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ibrahim, Y., & Arshad, I. (2018). Examining the impact of product involvement, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control on investment intentions of individual investors in Pakistan. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(4), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(4).2017.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jedicke, E. M., Arnold, C., & Lindenmeier, J. (2025). The dynamics of consumer boycott intention: Examining the roles of moral reasoning, cognitive dissonance, and self-congruence. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kamil, N. M., Abu Bakar, A., & Mohd Thas Thaker, M. A. (2026). Beyond purchase decisions: Understanding the determinants of consumer boycott intentions in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 6(22), 260–275. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lestari, L., Anisa, N. A., & Zaman, K. (2025). Influence of Boycott, Price, and Product Quality on Consumer Decisions for Unilever Sanitation Product in Pontianak. EKOMA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, 5(1), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.56799/ekoma.v5i1.11624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mady, K., Salaheldeen, M., Refaat, H., & Battour, M. (2025). The impact of social media on consumer boycotts: Mediating roles of animosity, behavioral control, and efficacy. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mulyono, H., & Rolando, B. (2025). Consumer boycott movements: Impact on brand reputation and business performance in the digital age. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(9), 2025291-2025291. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025291 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nasir, N. F., Jyn, S. T. H., & Hashim, S. H. M. (2022). Decomposition of Subjective Norms: Addressing the Importance of Normative Influence in Purchasing Unsought Product. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11), 1917 – 1922. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i11/15687 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nasir, N. F., Roslin, R. M., & Chui, T. B. (2017). Decomposing the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Incorporating Spiritual Intelligence to Further Understand Purchase Intention of Life Insurance and Takaful. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(16), 241-251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nasir, N. F., Roslin, R. M., & Chui, T. B. (2020). An Extended Analysis of Muslims’ Behavioural Intention in Purchasing Unsought Products. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 2(11), 164-178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nasir, N. F., Roslin, R.M., Nasir, M. A., & Nasir, M. N. F. (2020). Marketing strategies from the Islamic perspective: Reviewing the relevance of elements of the marketing mix. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 8(3), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v8i3.9952 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nasir, N. F., Roslin, R. M., Nasir, M. N. F., Nasir, M. F., Nasir, M. A., & Mohamed, N. A. (2021). Investigating Knowledge as a Possible Predictor of Purchase Intention among Muslims in Malaysia for Life Insurance and Takaful. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(2), 727–740. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i2/8880 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nordin, F. S. S., Khalid, N. R., & Hassan, R. (2024). Beyond purchase decisions: Understanding the drivers of consumer boycott intentions in Malaysia. Advanced International Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, 6(22), 260-275. https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.622019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Onyia, O. P., Ifie, K., & Egwuonwu, A. (2022). Investigating boycotts and buycotts as antecedents towards attitude and intention to engage in ethical consumption behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(4), 1312–1329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rahim, R. A., Harun, N. F. A., Ramli, F., & Azami, N. (2025). The Role of Social Media, Voice of Boycott, and Boycott Intention in Shaping Boycott Behavior among Malaysian Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(9), 522-535. https://doi.org/10.32535/apjme.v8i2.4070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Salma, N. A., & Aji, H. M. (2023). Testing the boundaries of the Theory of Planned Behavior: A cross-cultural analysis of boycott intentions between Malaysian and Greek consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(3), 982–997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sanusi, S. W. S. B. A., Bakar, N. R. B. A., & Mohamad, N. A. B. (2025). Boycotting Israeli Products as a Form of Islamic Ethical Consumerism: Implications for ESG Practices in Malaysia. 9768-9781. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.909000805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shim, K., & Cho, H. (2022). Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(1), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12671 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tariki, M. F. (2019). Elements influencing boycott participation among Malaysian Muslim youth: Animosity, corporate egregious behavior, and interpersonal influence. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Review, 7(2), 143–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ulfah, M., Sabrina, N., & Putri, A. L. (2025). Psychological Drivers of Consumer Boycott: Understanding Emotional and Social Identity Influences in Batam. Journal of Applied Business Administration, 9(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaba.v9i1.9152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yu, K. (2026). Contingent boycotts: The temporal evolution of consumer justifications. Journal of Macromarketing, 46(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467261426515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Yusof, R., & Roslan, S. (2024). Boycott phenomenon from multiple societal perspectives: Consumer activism and social media catalysts in Malaysia. Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Psychology, 8(11), 954–959. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles