Social Media, Digital Inequality and the Visibility of Marginalised Artists in Matabeleland, Zimbabwe: A Mixed-Methods Study of Emerging, Informal and Established Creatives
Authors
Faculty of Arts, Culture and Heritage Studies, Zimbabwe Open University; Arts Journalist, Arts Researcher, Artist Manager, Creatives Magazine Founder (Zimbabwe)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-24
Accepted: 2026-06-29
Published: 2026-07-13
Abstract
This qualitative study explores how marginalised artists in Matabeleland North and Matabeleland South provinces of Zimbabwe use social media platforms to promote their creative work, engage audiences and preserve cultural heritage. The study adopts a mixed-methods design involving 20 formally recognised artists and emerging/informal creators drawn from music, poetry, dance, visual arts, theatre and craft, alongside basic digital engagement analytics (views, shares, comments and reach) collected from participants’ social media pages. The findings indicate that social media serves as a vital platform for visibility, cultural preservation and community engagement, enabling artists to bypass traditional gatekeepers and connect with local and diaspora audiences However, Despite these opportunities despite these opportunities within structurally unequal digital environments, artists face persistent challenges including poor internet connectivity, high data costs, limited digital literacy, inadequate access to quality devices, algorithmic biases and minimal institutional support. Drawing on digital inequality theory (Norris, 2001; van Dijk, 2005), platform studies (Gillespie, 2018) and creative economy frameworks (Hesmondhalgh, 2019), the study demonstrates that visibility is unevenly distributed across platforms and shaped by both algorithmic structures and socio-economic constraints. Artists nevertheless exhibit resilience through content adaptation, collaborations and cross-platform circulation strategies.
Keywords
social media, marginalised artists, creative economy, Matabeleland North
Downloads
References
1. Adams, D., & Goldbard, A. (2019). Creative community: The art of cultural development. New Village Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bakhshi, H., Shamma, D. A., & Gilbert, E. (2014). Faces of engagement: Understanding audience participation in online creative communities. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-014-9212-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chiumbu, S., & Nyoni, B. (2020). Digital media and emerging artists in Zimbabwe: Opportunities and constraints. Journal of African Media Studies, 12(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00048_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Flew, T. (2020). Global creative industries. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Friedman, S., & Van der Merwe, L. (2021). Rural digital participation in Southern Africa: Challenges and prospects. Information Technology for Development, 27(4), 765–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1886365 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hearn, G., & Foth, M. (2020). Digital media and creative participation in low-resource contexts. Media International Australia, 176(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20931772 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NYU Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. NYU Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mlambo, A. (2017). The challenges of cultural production in Zimbabwe: Marginalisation and resilience. Zimbabwe Journal of Arts and Culture, 5(2), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Silver, H. (2015). Social inclusion and social justice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Heritage Lens: Empowering Malaysia's Tourism Industry through Photographic Synesthesia and Visual Influence
- AI Investment and Cultural Design Innovation: A Conceptual Framework for the Future of Batik in the Digital Economy
- Algorithmic Aura and Spiritual Alienation: A Critical Framework for AI-Generated Art Through Benjamin and Manovich
- Visualising Disease Through Lens: Camera Shot as Visual Storytelling in Transforming Reality to Art Cinematic in Disease Film
- Strategies for Integrating Gamification Mechanisms into the Digital Dissemination of Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of Stone Carvings in Southern Dynasties Mausoleums