Characterizing The Youth Predisposition Toward Employment in The Gig Economy in Kenya.
Authors
Murang’a University of Technology (Kenya)
Murang’a University of Technology (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601171
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 16693-16709
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-22
Accepted: 2026-06-27
Published: 2026-07-14
Abstract
This article explores the predisposition of Kenyan youth to employment in the gig economy focusing on socio-economic, educational, and institutional factors that influence participation. The objectives of the study include: to evaluate the socioeconomic factors that promote sustainable gig employment among Kenyan youth, analyze the existing policy and institutional enablers supporting the sustainable gig economy in Kenya and establish the challenges facing the sustainable gig economy in Kenya. The paper shall use evolutionary game theory, risk return trade off theory and social exchange theory. The study employed a cross sectional research design with quantitative and qualitative approach using a structured google form questionnaire administered to 350 youths engaged in various forms of gig work across sampled urban centres in Kenya. Data were analyzed using correlation analysis and multi regression analysis to determine the relationships and assess the predictive effect of gig economy on youth predisposition at 0.05 significance level. Results revealed that there was a positive correlation between enablers of sustainable gig employment among Kenyan youth (r = .90), challenges facing a sustainable gig economy in Kenya (r = .87) and existing policy and institutional enablers supporting the sustainable gig economy in Kenya (r = .93). The study found that the majority of the challenges faced by Kenya youth in the gig economy include: income instability, regulatory and policy gaps, difficult to form unions amongst other challenges. The study also indicated that with favorable existing policies and institutional enablers, the chances of the gig economy to thrive amongst Kenya youth are very high. It recommends that the age of youth participating in the gig economy be reviewed as currently the ages of people being considered as youth is between 18 to 35 years as opposed to the recommended age of youth being from 15 to 24 years old globally.
Keywords
Gig Economy, evolutionary game theory, risk trade off theory, social exchange theory, employment dynamics.
Downloads
References
1. Alauddin, F. D. A., Aman, A., Ghazali, M. F., & Daud, S. (2025). The influence of digital platforms on gig workers: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 11(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Allon, G., Cohen, M. C., & Sinchaisri, W. P. (2023). The impact of behavioral and economic drivers on gig economy workers. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 25(4), 1376-1393. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Anwar MA & Graham M (2020) Digital labour at economic margins: African workers and the global information economy. Review of African Political Economy 47(163): 95–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Basid, R., & Atmaja, J. (2022). The Effect of Generation Z Workforce Characteristics on The Gig Economy with Work Life Integration as a Mediator. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Contemporary Risk Studies, ICONIC-RS. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.31-3-2022.2320670 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bieber, F., & Moggia, J. (2021). Risk Shifts in the Gig Economy: The Normative Case for an Insurance Scheme against the Effects of Precarious Work*. Journal of Political Philosophy, 29(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Caballero, A. M. (2025). The Dynamics of Regulatory Change in Platform Work: Institutions, Labour Relations, and the Future of the Gig Economy in Spain and Chile (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester (United Kingdom)). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Chen, J. (2024). Are we only all by ourselves? A double-level perspective to cope with the insecurity of the nonstandard gig work model. International Journal of Manpower, 45(4), 733–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2023-0231 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chen, J., & Chen, M. (2025). Humanized algorithms matter! From enabling social exchange factors to building affective trust mechanism for facilitating gig workers’ task performance. Personnel Review, 54(2), 636-659. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Datche, E. A. (2015). Influence of transformational leadership on organizational performance of state corporations in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. De Stefano, V. (2016) “The rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the ‘gig-economy’”, Working Paper 71. Conditions of Work and Employment Series (Geneva, ILO). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Dong, J., & Yan, S. (2022). Evolutionary game analysis between employees and employers about working overtime from the perspective of information asymmetry. BMC psychology, 10(1), 95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Edward, W. (2021). The Uberisation of work: the challenge of regulating platform capitalism. A commentary. In Ownership and Governance of Companies (pp. 282-291). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Eichelberger, D. (2023). Cost-Benefit analysis of Teacher-Student relationships: A case study. Southern Nazarene University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Farrell, D; Greig, F. 2016. Paychecks, paydays, and the online platform economy: Big data on income volatility. JP Morgan Chase Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Feng Y, Lagakos D, Rauch JE (2024) Unemployment and development. Econ J 134(658):614–647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Healy, J., Nicholson, D. J., & Pekarek, A. (2017). Should we take the gig economy seriously? Labour and Industry A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 27(3), 232–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2017.1377048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Irani, L. (2015). The cultural work of microwork. New media & society, 17(5), 720-739. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Johnston, H., Ergun, O., Schor, J., & Chen, L. (2024). Employment status and the on-demand economy: a natural experiment on reclassification. Socio-Economic Review, 22(1), 169-194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Kaine S, Oliver D and Josserand E (2017) Precarity in the gig-economy: the experience of rideshare drivers. In: Association of Industrial Relations Academics in Australia and New Zealand Conference, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 8–10 February [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Kinder, E., Jarrahi, M. H., & Sutherland, W. (2019). Gig platforms, tensions, alliances and ecosystems: An actor-network perspective. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Kuek SC, Paradi-Guilford C, Fayomi T, (2015) The Global Opportunity in Online Outsourcing. Washington D.C: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Kuhn KM, Meijerink J, Keegan A (2021) Human resource management and the gig economy: challenges and opportunities at the intersection between organizational hr decision-makers and digital labor platforms. Res Pers Hum Res Manage 39:1–46 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Lazar, T., Ribak, R., & Davidson, R. (2020). Mobile social media as platforms in workers’ unionization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(3), 437-453. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Lian, Z., Martin, S., & van Ryzin, G. (2025). Labor cost free-riding in the gig economy. Available at SSRN 3775888. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Liu, P. (2025). Fundamentals of Risk and Return in Finance. In Quantitative Risk Management Using Python: An Essential Guide for Managing Market, Credit, and Model Risk (pp. 31-63). Berkeley, CA: Apress. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Okeyo, M. D. (2022). An Investigation into the extent to which the GIG economy has contributed to employment opportunities among the young people in Nairobi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Omar, N., & Jamil, R. (2025). A systematic literature review of the gig economy: insights into worker experiences, policy implications, and the impact of digitalization. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX (II), 2136-2156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Otieno, D. (2024). POLICY OPTIONS FOR ENHANCED ACCESS TO AGRICULTURAL LAND FOR MIGRATING YOUTH IN DENSELY POPULATED RURAL KENYA. International Journal of Recent development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Newton, J. (2018) Evolutionary game theory: A renaissance, Games, 9(2), 31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. R Pugu, M., Sugiardi, S., & Thalib, B. (2025). Regulatory Challenges in the Face of the Gig Economy and Cross-Border Remote Work. International Journal of Social Science Education Communication and Economics (SINOMICS JOURNAL), 4(2), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.54443/sj.v4i2.510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Roca, C. P., Cuesta, J. A., & Sánchez, A. (2009). Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics. Physics of life reviews, 6(4), 208-249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Smith, R., & Leberstein, S. (2015). Rights on demand. Ensuring Workplace Standards and Worker Security In the On-Demand Economy, National Employment Law Project, Washington DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Steinbaum, M. (2019). Antitrust, the gig economy, and labor market power. Law and Contemporary Problems, 82(3), 45-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Stewart, A., & Stanford, J. (2017). Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 420-437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The ‘gig economy’: employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation?. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 193-205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of games and economic behavior: 60th anniversary commemorative edition. In Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton university press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Wang, J., Gao, Q. & Zhang, R. Gig economy and its impact on individual employment: an empirical analysis. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 1703 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05970-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Wood AJ, Graham M, Lehdonvirta V, et al. (2019b) Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment & Society: A Journal of the British Sociological Association 33(1): 56–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria