Innovation, Governance, and ESG: Impacts on the Economic-Financial Performance in Organizations

In emerging economies, integrating innovation, governance, and ESG criteria poses a strategic challenge, necessitating analyses that align these dimensions. This study, using data from 3483 observations of companies listed on B3 (2015-2022), examined the effects of these factors on economic-financial performance, alongside ESG’s role in mitigating CEO duality and promoting female board representation. Employing the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), results revealed complex relationships: innovation positively impacted performance, solidifying its role as a competitive driver. CEO duality exhibited progressively negative effects, highlighting risks of power concentration. Female representation yielded ambiguous impacts, suggesting reliance on inclusion policies. ESG practices, though linked to operational costs and greenwashing in isolation, enhanced positive outcomes when combined with diversified boards, underscoring governance-sustainability synergies. Theoretically, the study integrated Stakeholder and Agency Theories, indicating ESG amplifies benefits in collaborative contexts but fails to offset governance gaps. Practically, it recommends balanced governance structures, separation of leadership roles, and gender diversity investments as strategic complements to ESG. Thus, the research underscores the relevance of multifaceted approaches for sustainable performance in emerging markets, offering insights into mitigating risks while leveraging innovation and governance synergies.

sustainability, accountability, transparency, inclusion

1. Abid, N., Ceci, F., Ahmad, F., & Aftab, J. (2022). Financial development and green innovation, the ultimate solutions to an environmentally sustainable society: Evidence from leading economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 369, 133223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics, 94(2), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Agoraki, K. K., Giaka, M., Konstantios, D., & Negkakis, I. (2024). The relationship between firm-level climate change exposure, financial integration, cost of capital and investment efficiency. Journal of International Money and Finance, 141, 102994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2023.102994. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aguilera, R. V., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marano, V., & Tashman, P. A. (2021). The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1468-1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321991212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aksoy, M., Yilmaz, M. K., Tatoglu, E., & Basar, M. (2020). Antecedents of corporate sustainability performance in Turkey: The effects of ownership structure and board attributes on non-financial companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alkaraan, F., Elmarzouky, M., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Gulko, N. (2025). Maximising sustainable performance: Integrating servitisation innovation into green sustainable supply chain management under the influence of governance and Industry 4.0. Journal of Business Research, 186, 115029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alvarez, J., & Arellano, M. (2022). Robust likelihood estimation of dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 226(1), 21-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. An, H., Chen, C. R., Wu, Q., & Zhang, T. (2021). Corporate innovation: Do diverse boards help?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(1), 155-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109019001005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Austin, A., & Rahman, I. U. (2022). A triple helix of market failures: Financing the 3Rs of the circular economy in European SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 361, 132284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Baldi, F., & Pandimiglio, A. (2022). The role of ESG scoring and greenwashing risk in explaining the yields of green bonds: A conceptual framework and an econometric analysis. Global Finance Journal, 52, 100711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Boakye, D. J., Tingbani, I., Ahinful, G. S., & Nsor-Ambala, R. (2021). The relationship between environmental management performance and financial performance of firms listed in the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 124034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chu, H. L., Liu, N. Y., & Chiu, S. C. (2023). CEO power and CSR: the moderating role of CEO characteristics. China Accounting and Finance Review, 25(1), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAFR-03-2022-0027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Enciso‐Alfaro, S. Y., & García‐Sánchez, I. M. (2024). Do boards care about planetary boundaries? A gender perspective on circular economy disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4562-4597. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C., (1983). Separation of ownership and control. SSRN Electronic Journal. 26 (2), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. García-Meca, E., Ramón-Llorens, M. C., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2024). Feminine expertise on board and environmental innovation: the role of critical mass. Review of Managerial Science, 18(8), 2255-2286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00685-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A New Sustainability Paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Griffin, D., Li, K., & Xu, T. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate innovation: International evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(1), 123-154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002210901900098X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hall, B. H., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2014). Evidence on the Impact of R&D and ICT Investment on Innovation and Productivity in Italian Firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(3), 300–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2012.708134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hsieh, T. Y., Lin, T. Y., Li, F., & Kuo, J. N. (2024). CEO duality and corporation innovation. Sage Open, 14(1), 21582440231226019. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231226019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ilyas, I. M., & Osiyevskyy, O. (2022). Exploring the impact of sustainable value proposition on firm performance. European Management Journal, 40(5), 729-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Khan, T. M., Gang, B., Fareed, Z., & Yasmeen, R. (2020). The impact of CEO tenure on corporate social and environmental performance: an emerging country’s analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 19314-19326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08468-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Konadu, R., Ahinful, G. S., Boakye, D. J., & Elbardan, H. (2022). Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Konadu, R., Ahinful, G. S., Boakye, D. J., & Elbardan, H. (2022). Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Korphaibool, V., Chindasombatcharoen, P., Chatjuthamard, P., Jiraporn, P., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2024). Business sustainability under the influence of female directors toward the risk‐taking in innovation: Evidence from textual analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 1578-1591. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3560 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Krause, R. (2017). Being the CEO's boss: An examination of board chair orientations. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 697-713. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kwarteng, A., Simpson, S. N. Y., & Agyenim-Boateng, C. (2022). The effects of circular economy initiative implementation on business performance: the moderating role of organizational culture. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(7), 1311-1341. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2021-0045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Liu, X., Huang, N., Su, W., & Zhou, H. (2024). Green innovation and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 95, 103461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ma, Z., Shu, G., Wang, Q., & Wang, L. (2022). Sustainable governance and green innovation: A perspective from gender diversity in China's listed companies. Sustainability, 14(11), 6403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Med Bechir, C., & Jouirou, M. (2024). Investment efficiency and corporate governance: evidence from Asian listed firms. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(3), 596-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1974241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nguyen, T. H. H., Ntim, C. G., & Malagila, J. K., (2020). Women on corporate boards and corporate financial and non-financial erformance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101554 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Palea, V., Santhià, C., & Miazza, A. (2023). Are circular economy strategies economically successful? Evidence from a longitudinal panel. Journal of Environmental Management, 337, 117726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of management Journal, 58(5), 1546-1571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Mäkinen, S. J. (2018). Creating value in the circular economy: A structured multiple-case analysis of business models. Journal of cleaner production, 201, 988-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ribeiro, A. D.; & Funchal, B. (2018). Fatores determinantes na incorporação das organizações ao ISE. Base Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da UNISINOS, v. 15, n. 1, p. 31-41. https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2018.151.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (environmental, social and governance) performance and board gender diversity: the moderating role of CEO duality. Sustainability, 12(21), 9298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Shakil, M.H., Tasnia, M. and Mostafiz, M.I. (2021), "Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance performance of US banks: moderating role of environmental, social and corporate governance controversies", International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(4), 661-677. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2020-0210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press. Acesso em: 27 fev. 2025. Disponível em: http://mmf.lnu.edu.ua/images/stories/depart/mee/wooldridge_cross_section_and_panel_data.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zhang, D. (2023). Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration. Energy Economics, 121, 106688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zournatzidou, G., Ragazou, K., Sklavos, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2025). Examining the Impact of Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance Factors on Long-Term Financial Stability of the European Financial Institutions: Dynamic Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13010003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria