A Systematic Literature Review : Adopting Machine Learning (ML) Models to Measure the Financial Inclusion of Gig Workers in Malaysia

The rapid expansion of the gig economy in Malaysia has created new employment opportunities but has also intensified challenges related to financial inclusion, particularly access to credit and formal lending services. This study aims to systematically review the financial barriers faced by gig workers and examine the role of Machine Learning (ML) in enhancing credit risk assessment and financial accessibility for individuals engaged in non-traditional employment. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Relevant studies published between 2020 and 2025 were retrieved from major open-access databases, including Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, DOAJ, SpringerOpen, MDPI, and PLOS. The selected studies were analysed using thematic synthesis to identify recurring patterns, machine learning applications, data features, and research gaps related to gig workers’ creditworthiness. The findings reveal that gig workers experience significant difficulties in obtaining credit due to irregular income streams, limited employment documentation, and insufficient credit histories. This study contributes to the literature by proposing a conceptual framework that integrates machine learning techniques with risk identification, assessment, evaluation, mitigation, and monitoring processes to support more inclusive credit risk management. The framework offers a foundation for future empirical research and policy development aimed at improving financial inclusion among gig workers in Malaysia.

Sistematic Literature Review, Machine Learning Models, Financial Inclusion, Gig Workers

1. Ayari, H., Guetari, R., & Kraïem, N. (2026). Machine learning powered financial credit scoring: A systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 59, 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11416-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bank Negara Malaysia. (2023). Financial Stability Review. https://www.bnm.gov.my/fsr [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Risk management in technology (RMiT).https://www.bnm.gov.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). Labour Force Survey Report, 3Q 2024. Putrajaya: DOSM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowd work and labour protection in the gig economy. International Labour Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ekong, R. E., Akintola, K. G., & Kuboye, B. M. (2022). Development of credit scoring model for borrowers using machine learning techniques. PERSPECTIVE, 11(3), 829–838. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fuster, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Ramadorai, T., & Walther, A. (2022). Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets. Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000: Risk management—Guidelines. https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-riskmanagement.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lessmann, S., Baesens, B., Seow, H.-V., & Thomas, L. C. (2015). Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.02.030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mohd Shakil, N. S. (2024). Gig economy in Malaysia: Current, present and future. Information Management and Business Review, 16(2), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i2(I)S.3769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ng, J. J., Samsudin, S., & Mohd Daud, S. N. (2024). Financial vulnerability, resilience, and willingness to pay for social protection schemes among gig workers: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Southeast Asian Journal of Economics, 12(3), 71–105. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/saje/article/view/267912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., AkI, E., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Samsudin, S., Mohd Khan, S. J., Hasan, J., Mohd Daud, S. N., & Ng, J. J. (2024). Financial vulnerability of gig workers: Insights and implications for social protection schemes. International Journal of Social Policy and Society, 20(2024). Retrieved from https://ijsps.ism.gov.my/IJSPS/article/view/311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Uchiyama, Y., Furuoka, F., & Md. Akhir, M. N. (2022). Gig workers, social protection and labour market inequality: Lessons from Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 56(3), 165–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2022-5603-09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. World Bank. (2023). Working Without Borders: The Promise and Peril of Online Gig Work. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. WSDC Team Malaysia. (2025, May 26). Gig economy worker. https://wsdcmalaysia.org/gig-economy-worker/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Bridging Digital Confidence and Financial Technology: A Systematic Review of Generation Z’s Mobile Payment Adoption
• Effect of Financial Assets of Financial Instruments on Financial Performance of Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria