The Use of ChatGPT in Academic Writing: Perspectives from Undergraduate Students in Malaysian Public University

Authors

Amirah Athirah Amir Yazid

Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch (Malaysia)

Nurul Ain Hasni

Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch (Malaysia)

Mohamad Syafiq Ya Shak

Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch (Malaysia)

Norasyikin Abdul Malik

Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch (Malaysia)

Nuramira Anuar

Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch (Malaysia)

Aurelio P. Vilbar

College of Social Sciences, University of the Philippines Cebu, Lahug, Cebu (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601222

Subject Category: Artificial Intelligence

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 17723-17737

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-28

Accepted: 2026-07-04

Published: 2026-07-15

Abstract

Academic writing necessitates the deployment of various metacognitive, effort regulation, cognitive, social, and affective strategies. Recently, the integration of artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, has emerged as a digital scaffold designed to guide and assist writers through the composing process. This quantitative study aims to explore the utilization of ChatGPT as an academic scaffold and investigate its correlational relationship with the writing strategies employed by learners. Employing a quantitative survey design, data were collected utilizing a 43-item, 5-point Likert-scale instrument divided into two primary constructs: Writing Strategies and ChatGPT usage. A convenience sample of 95 undergraduate students from Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Perak Branch participated in the study. Correlation analyses indicated a significant positive association between ChatGPT usage and overall writing strategies. Specifically, a medium positive correlation was identified between ChatGPT usage and metacognitive (r = .358), effort regulation (r = .419), cognitive (r = .385), and affective (r = .491) writing strategies. Conversely, a weak positive correlation was observed concerning social writing strategies (r = .273). These findings carry pertinent pedagogical implications, suggesting that higher education practitioners should systematically integrate AI scaffolding into writing instruction to enhance self-regulated learning and writing behaviors.

Keywords

Academic Writing; ChatGPT Integration; Digital Scaffolding

Downloads

References

1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-L earning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Khairuddin,Z, Rahmat, N.H., Noor, M.M., & Khairuddin,Z. (2021) The Us eof Rhetorical Strategies in Argumentative Essays. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(S3), 263-285). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Rahmat,N.H. (2021) An Investigative Study of Cognitive and Metacognitive Paraphrasing Strategies in ESL Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 11(3), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/8919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Raoofi,S. Miri,A., Gharibi,J. & Malaki, B. (2017) Assessing and Validating a Writing Strategy Scale for Undergraduate Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol 8(3), pp 624-633. Retrieved from http://www.academypublication.com/issues2/jltr/vol08/03/23.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Vetter, T.R. (2017) Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When , Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Youssef,E., Medhat,M., Abdellatif,S., & Al Malek,M. (2024) Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman,UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(Dec 2024), 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C.. (202) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles