Confronting the Country’s Fault Lines: Insights of Legal Advocates on Social Issues and Discontentment

This study focuses on a qualitative research method employing the Transcendental Phenomenology Approach. It is largely developed by Husserl and is a philosophical approach to qualitative research methodology seeking to understand the perspectives of the legal advocates on major national issues in the Philippines. The research was conducted in a community-based environment located in Barangay Punta, Tisa, and Labangon, with informants situated across urban centers and rural localities, ensuring perspectives from both institutional and grassroots contexts.
This study explores the evolving role of legal advocates in the Philippines as they confront pressing national and global issues, ranging from human rights and governance to socio-economic and environmental challenges. Anchored in H.L.A. Hart’s Legal Positivism Theory and supported by Festinger’s Cognitive Dissonance and Social Comparison theories, the research highlights how advocacy operates at the intersection of law, morality, and social mobilization. Using literature reviews, case studies, and interviews with 10 informants drawn from legal practitioners, the findings reveal that legal victories alone are insufficient unless reinforced by grassroots organizing, policy reforms, and international cooperation.
The study extracted significant statements relevant to the research phenomenon from the informants' transcripts. These statements were then formatted into a cluster, developing twelve (12) emergent themes. These themes addressed the sub-problems and are summarized as follows: (a) Perspectives of the informants on the major national issues in the Philippines, (b) Perception of legal advocates in its role in addressing current national issues, (c) Views of the legal community on the effectiveness of existing laws and policies related to national issues, (d) Legal community’s assessment of the government’s adherence to the rule of law in handling national issues, (e) Effects of the national issues in the practice of law and legal profession in the country, and (f). Perspectives of the legal community on the balance between human rights and national security in policy-making.
The findings of this study may contribute to a deeper understanding of the legal community’s views and inform future legal education, policy development, and advocacy efforts. The study found that legal advocacy in the Philippines is most effective when legal victories are tied to grassroots mobilization, policy reforms, and international cooperation. Filipino advocates influence both local and global law, as seen in maritime disputes and migrant labor protections, but challenges remain in ensuring judicial independence amid political interference and limited resources. Human rights advocacy is crucial, with NGOs defending activists against red-tagging and repression, while governance issues such as corruption and weak enforcement highlight the need for stronger institutions. Socio-economic inequality persists, particularly for farmers and overseas workers affected by policies like the Rice Tariffication Law, and environmental justice emerges as a vital concern linking disaster resilience to social equity. Overall, the findings emphasize that durable change requires holistic advocacy that bridges legal precedent with community realities and strengthens enforcement to safeguard democracy.

Legal advocacy, Human rights, Judicial independence, Governance, Socio-economic inequality, Environmental justice, Red-tagging, Grassroots mobilization, International law, and Democracy.

1. Books [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Benosa, R. J. (2017). Current international legal issues: Philippines. Asian Yearbook of International Law, 41–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Casis, R. J., & Benosa, M. (2017). Current international legal issues: Philippines. Asian Yearbook of International Law (pp. 41–60). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Green, L. (2019). Legal positivism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Edition). Stanford University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Journals [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cente, E. L. (1990). Who we are. ELAC Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Citizen, C. (2025). Legal article: An in-depth analysis of national concerns under Philippines law. Respicio & Co. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Co, E. E. A., et al. (2010). Philippine democracy assessment: Rule of law and access to justice. Quezon City: University of the Philippines National College of Public Administration and Governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hasanagic, A. (n.d.). 10 NGOs advocating for human rights in the Philippines. Human Rights Careers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hilbay, F. (2019). Constitutional law and democratic backsliding in the Philippines. Philippine Law Journal, 93, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Go, M. E. (2023). Assessing local governance and autonomy in the Philippines: Three decades of the 1991 Local Government Code. University of the Philippines Center for Integrative and Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Republic of the Philippines. (2025). Major environmental laws. Environmental Compliance Assistance Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Internet Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. BANOTES. (2023). BANOTES. http://banotes.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kayala, H., Madhu, P., & Werkun, E. (2023, August 31). Social comparison on social media. OxJournal. https://oxjournal.org/social-comparison-on-social-media [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Institute of International Legal Studies. (2024).University of the Philippines. https://iils.upd.edu.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Legal Advice Philippines. (2024). The comprehensive guide to free legal advice in the Philippines. Legal Advice Philippines.https://legaladvicephilippines.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rappler. (2025, January). Philippines: Duterte's appearance at ICC a symbolic moment for 'war on drugs' victims. Rappler. https://rappler.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Respicio & Co. (2025). Advocating for policy changes in the Philippines: Legal framework, rights and practical guidelines. Respicio & Co. https://respicioandco.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Alternative Law Group, Inc. (2018). Transitional justice: Philippines case study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Transitional Justice Asia Network. https://tjanetwork.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Angustia, J. C. (2025). Legal measures against corruption and political disorder. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Diskurso.ph. https://diskurso.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Camins, E. (2023). Bridging fault lines: Exploring an obligation under international law to assist victims of armed conflict. Harvard Human Rights Journal. https:/harvardhrj.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Cherry, K. (2024). History of social comparison theory. Verywell Mind. https:/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. www.verywellmind.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Congress of the Philippines. (2019). Republic Act No. 11203 - Rice Tariffication Law.Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Congress of the Philippines. (2020), Republic Act No. 11479 - The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020. Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Go, M. E. (2023). Assessing local governance and autonomy in the Philippines: Three decades of the 1991 Local Government Code. University of the Philippines Center for Integrative and Development Studies. https://cids.up.edu.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Hilbay, F. (2019). Constitutional law and democratic backsliding in the Philippines. hilippine Law Journal. https://plj.upd.edu. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Human Rights Careers. (2021). 10 NGOs advocating for human rights in the Philippines. https://www.humanrightscareers.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. International Commission of Jurists. (2025). HRC59: Statement to the Special [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rapporteur - confronting global attacks on judicial independence in Guatemala and Tunisia. ICJ. https://www.icj.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kramer, M. H. (2021). The legal positivism of H. L. A. Hart. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Lawyer Philippines. (2023). 12 Philippine free legal advice groups. https:/ lawyerphilippines.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. McLeod, S. (2023). Cognitive dissonance theory. Simply Psychology. hittps:// www.simplypsychology.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Mangaluz, J. (2025), PhilStar Global. https://www.philstar.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Nalbandian, E. (2010), Positivist theory of law - H. L. A. Hart: Hart's concept of law. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ordoñez, M. (2018). Philippine liberal democracy under siege. Philippine Political Science Journal. https://www.tandfonline.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Rappler. (2025, January). Philippines: Duterte's appearance at ICC a symbolic moment for 'war on drugs' victims. Rappler. https://rappler.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Republic of the Philippines. (2013). Republic Act No. 10368 - Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition Act of 2013. Official Gazette. https://emb.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Republic of the Philippines. (2025). Major environmental laws. Environmental Compliance Assistance Center. https://emb.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Ratchaya, S. (2021). Primary rule v. secondary rule: H. L.A. Hart. Legal Theory Blog. https://example.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Stewart, D. (2024). Public international law's in-house counsel for small and developing countries. Independent International Legal Advocates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. https://iila.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Sun, J. R. (2024, September 17). Trust in legal institutions: An examination of the Philippines. https://example.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Tiongco, G. J. (2021). A rock and a hard place: Challenges of free legal aid in the Philippines. Thomson Reuters Foundation. https://www.trust.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Verma, S. K. (2021). Cognitive dissonance and attitude change: Conceptual note. Journal of Psychology. https://example.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. VerPlanck, J. (2025). Social comparison theory. https://example.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Wahab-Manantan, J. E. (2018, July). Dynamics between diplomacy and international law. World Jurisprudence. https://example.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Women, G. N. (2025). GABRIELA - National Alliance of Filipino Women. Gabriela Women's Party. https://gabriela.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Woodbury-Smith, K. (2025). Legal positivism: Inclusive. https://example.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Yeager-Malkin, R. (2023). Explainer: The Philippines-China maritime dispute and international law. Jurist News. https://www.jurist.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Crime Pattern in The Province of LA Union: A Study on Index and Non-Index Crimes
• Theorizing Participation within the Juvenile Delinquency Discourse: A Critical Systemic Analysis on Children in Conflict With the Law in Davao City
• The Impact of Congestion on Rehabilitation in Akure Correctional Centre of Ondo State
• Voices Beneath the Policy: Village Reflections on Smart Policing Strategies of the Philippine National Police (Pnp)
• Policing The Future: Community Stories on the Philippine National Police (PNP) Smart Policing Shift