Engineering Serendipity: Reclaiming Joyful Discovery and Consumer Trust in Hyper-Personalized Ai Systems

The widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in recommendation systems has revolutionized how users interact with content, commerce, and culture. However, the same hyper-personalization that enhances user relevance often suppresses discovery, autonomy, and delight—leading to consumer resistance and systemic homogenization. This study explores the phenomenon of engineered serendipity—the intentional design of systems that balance personalization with purposeful unpredictability. Drawing from cross-disciplinary literature in computer science, human–AI interaction, and behavioral engineering, we develop a conceptual framework and propose a roadmap for integrating serendipity as a measurable engineering objective. Our findings suggest that reintroducing controlled randomness, diversity-aware ranking, and transparent user controls can restore trust and joy in AI-mediated discovery. This work highlights the importance of aligning engineering design, consumer psychology, and ethical governance to reclaim human curiosity in an algorithmically filtered world.

Serendipity Engineering, Hyper-Personalization

1. Barrett, L. F., Adolphs, R., Marsella, S., Martinez, A. M., & Pollak, S. D. (2019). Emotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20(1), 1–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv:1702.08608. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. European Commission High-Level Expert Group on AI (EU HLEG). (2020). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Floridi, L. (2019). The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Helberger, N. (2019). On the democratic role of news recommenders. Digital Journalism, 7(8), 993–1012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kappen, H. J. (2011). Optimal control theory and the linear Bellman equation. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, P11011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kang, J., Li, J., & Zhao, M. (2022). Algorithmic personalization and user fatigue: The limits of relevance. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 937–954. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. McCay-Peet, L., & Toms, E. G. (2017). Serendipity: Towards a definition and a model. Information Research, 12(4), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-centered AI: Reliable, safe & trustworthy. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 495–504. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Simonton, D. K. (2018). Defining creativity: Don't we also need to define what is not creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(1), 80–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. PublicAffairs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition