Carbon Accounting Disclosures on the Firm Value of Listed Consumer Goods Firms in Nigeria
Authors
Department Of Accounting Faculty of Management Sciences Akwa Ibom State University, Obio Akpa Campus (Nigeria)
Department Of Accounting Faculty of Management Sciences Akwa Ibom State University, Obio Akpa Campus (Nigeria)
Department Of Accounting Faculty of Management Sciences Akwa Ibom State University, Obio Akpa Campus (Nigeria)
Department Of Accounting Faculty of Management Sciences Akwa Ibom State University, Obio Akpa Campus (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601262
Subject Category: Accounting
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 18378-18390
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-25
Accepted: 2026-06-30
Published: 2026-07-16
Abstract
This study examined the effect of carbon accounting disclosures on the market capitalization of listed consumer goods firms in Nigeria. Specifically, it investigated the impact of carbon emission disclosure, carbon reduction strategies and targets disclosure, and energy efficiency and low-carbon initiatives disclosure on firm value. The study was motivated by increasing global concern over climate change and the growing importance of environmental transparency in corporate reporting, particularly in emerging economies where disclosure practices remain weak and inconsistent. An ex post facto research design was adopted, and data were obtained from the annual reports, sustainability reports, and financial statements of 17 listed consumer goods firms on the Nigerian Exchange Group (NGX) covering the period 2015–2024, yielding 170 firm-year observations. Carbon accounting disclosure was measured using a structured disclosure index, while firm value was proxied by market capitalization. Panel regression techniques were employed to analyze the data. The findings revealed that carbon emission disclosure and energy efficiency and low-carbon initiatives disclosure have significant positive effects on market capitalization, indicating that firms with higher transparency in emissions reporting and stronger operational sustainability initiatives tend to achieve higher market value. However, carbon reduction strategies and targets disclosure showed no statistically significant effect on market capitalization. The results suggest that investors in Nigeria place greater value on observable and operational sustainability actions than on forward-looking commitments. The study concludes that carbon accounting disclosures are important determinants of firm value in the Nigerian consumer goods sector. It recommends that firms enhance emissions transparency and invest in energy-efficient and low-carbon initiatives, while regulators strengthen disclosure standards to improve consistency and comparability of carbon reporting.
Keywords
Carbon accounting disclosure, market capitalization, consumer goods firms, Nigeria, sustainability reporting, climate change
Downloads
References
1. Adewale, O., & Okoye, E. (2025). Carbon emission disclosure and market capitalization of Nigerian non-financial firms. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Finance, 12(2), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., & Rashid, N. (2020). Measuring firm value using market-based indicators: Evidence from emerging markets. International Journal of Economics and Management, 14(3), 211–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Aifuwa, H. O., Embele, K., & Saidu, M. (2023). Carbon disclosure practices in emerging economies: Evidence from Nigerian firms. Sustainability Accounting Review, 8(1), 33–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Borghei, Z. (2021). Environmental disclosure and sustainability reporting: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 543–560. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Clarke, J. (2022). Corporate carbon reporting and environmental transparency. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(4), 1021–1040. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2019). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 75, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Clarke, J., & Boersma, M. (2021). Energy efficiency disclosures and firm performance in developing economies. Energy Economics, 94, 105060. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Deegan, C. (2019). Financial accounting theory (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Deegan, C. (2020). Legitimacy theory and sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2022). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 68(7), 456–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Gerged, A. M., Albitar, K., & Al-Hares, O. (2021). Climate-related disclosure and investor response. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2331–2345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2019). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 45(2), 402–432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. IFRS Foundation. (2023). International sustainability standards and climate-related disclosures. https://www.ifrs.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Energy efficiency 2023 report. https://www.iea.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting. (2025). Carbon disclosure measurement practices in emerging markets. IJAFR, 15(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Issa, A., Khan, M., & Hussain, S. (2024). Sustainability reporting and energy efficiency disclosures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 402, 136789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Issar, P. (2017). Market capitalization and firm valuation methods. International Finance Review, 18(2), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Liu, Y., & Wang, X. (2025). Carbon disclosure quality and firm valuation in China. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 10(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Malik, M., Frost, G., & Wiese, M. (2021). Governance structures and climate risk disclosure. Accounting & Finance, 61(4), 567–589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures and legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344–371. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Odo, I., Nwoye, U., & Okafor, T. (2025). Sustainability disclosures and market valuation in Nigeria. African Journal of Accounting Research, 9(2), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Onyebuenyi, J., & Aifuwa, H. O. (2025). Carbon emission disclosure and firm value in Nigerian consumer goods firms. Journal of Sustainable Finance, 6(1), 25–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Pankratz, N. M., & Zeisberger, S. (2023). Carbon disclosure and investor decision-making. Review of Finance, 27(3), 889–920. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Saraswati, S. (2020). Corporate environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2), 389–405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019). Business cases for sustainability: A stakeholder theory perspective. Organization & Environment, 32(3), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Schaltegger, S., et al. (2022). Energy efficiency and sustainability transitions in firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129739. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. World Bank. (2023). Climate change and corporate disclosure in emerging markets. https://www.worldbank.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. World Resources Institute (WRI). (2025). Greenhouse gas protocol standards and guidance. https://www.wri.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Chen, J. (2025). Carbon disclosure quality and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 82, 102480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
- The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
- Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
- Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
- A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors