Systematic Literature Review: Teaching-Learning Strategies through Experiential Learning in the Accounting Subject Towards Students' Behaviour

Authors

Ahzan Noraini Ahmad

Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, University Tun Hussein Onn (Malaysia)

Hashima Hamid

Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, University Tun Hussein Onn (Malaysia)

Syaidatun Nazirah Abu Zahrin

Institute Islam Hadhari & School of Liberal Studies, University Kebangsaan Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000213

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 2547-2561

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-06

Accepted: 2025-10-12

Published: 2025-11-07

Abstract

Experiential learning (EL) is a learning process involving direct engagement to acquire knowledge or skills and is used to connect theory and classroom learning to solve real-world problems. While teachers play a crucial role in designing, implementing, and creating learning experiences, using appropriate methods to achieve learning objectives and facilitate the acquisition of knowledge and skills, studies in EL remains limited. This is despite EL being seen as a novel method in education and student-centered pedagogy, in which it has contributed to enhance value-based education, skill development, and experiences in learning. Hence, this reflects a deep need for this study. A systematic literature review was conducted, encompassing empirical studies sourced from the year 2019 to 2023 to identify the implementation methods of EL in classrooms, focusing on the accounting subject, and the effects of EL implementation on student behavior in the classroom. Among 151 analyzed studies, this article reviews the 22 most relevant studies involving methods and the impact of EL implementation in the classroom. Seven studies suggest simulation methods, six suggest project-based methods, and five suggest role-playing methods, while others recommend gaming, case studies, and more. EL methods are shown to provide positive impacts on students’ behavior, hence, enhancing their, active engagement, conceptual mastery, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. By researching EL, this will help increase students’ engagement.

Keywords

Teaching strategies; experiential learning; accounting, active engagement

Downloads

References

1. Pan, L., Xi, H.Q., Shen, X.W. & Zhang, C.Y. (2018). “Toolbox of teaching strategies. Frontiers of Nursing, Vol. 5 No. 4, https://doi.org/10.1515/fon-2018-0033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Meng, X., Niu, D., Ding, L., & Wang, L. (2024). “Research on the effect of mixed teaching strategies on students' ambidextrous innovation”. Studies in Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101390 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Saracaloğlu, A., & Altin, M. (2020). “Teachers’ opinions on instructional strategies, methods and techniques”. Eğitim Yansımaları, Vol. 4 No. 1. pp.1-24 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Trongtorsak, S., Saraubon, K., & Nilsook, P. (2021). “Collaborative experiential learning process for enhancing digital entrepreneurship”. Higher Education Studies, Vol. 11 No. 1.pp. 137-147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gray, T., & Ross, C. (2020). The effects of an experiential learning course on secondary student achievement and motivation in Geometry. University of Missouri-Saint Louis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ahmad, S. R., Samsudin, M., Adenan, F., Zulkifli, M. F., Rahmawati, E., & Suhaimi, A. I. H. (2024). “Evaluation of Academic Enhancement Program for Low-Income Students in Rural Malaysia”. Journal of Technical Education and Training, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp.241–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hussin, H., Kamal, N., & Ibrahim, M. F. (2019). “Inculcating problem solving and analytical skills in STEM education practices: The CRYsTaL initiatives”. International Journal of Innovation Creativity and Change. Vol 9. No 6. pp.260–272 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Halim, L., Nam, L. A., & Shahali, E. H. M. (2021). “STEM education in Malaysia: Policies to implementation. In STEM education from Asia”. Routledge. pp.33-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Aripin, M. A., Hisham, M. H. M., Zainuddin, M. I. Z., Pairan, M. R., Hamid, M. Z A., & Al-Shami, S. A. (2021). “Role of Malaysia TVET Teachers' Training Institutions toward Industry and Education 4.0”. Rigeo, Vol. 11 No 8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Yau, P. C., Kim, Y., Wong, D., Pang, P., Kan, S., & Cao, Q. (2022). “What Students Want to Have in the Post-Pandemic? A Study about Computing Science Study Preferences and Mode of Study in Southeast Asia”. In Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Education Technology Management. pp. 59-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mustapha, R. B. (2017). “Skills training and vocational education in Malaysia”. Education in Malaysia: developments and challenges, pp.137-153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mekonen, D., & Kelkay, A. D. (2023). “Inquiry-based instructional strategies for effective conceptualization of photosynthesis: The case of elementary school”. Cogent Education, Vol. 10 No. 1 2172927. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Obro, S. (2023). “Efficacy of innovative instructional strategies: effect of learning games strategy on students' learning outcome in social studies classroom”. International Journal of Learning and Change, Vol.15 No1.pp. 96-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Biswal, B. N. (2019). “Teaching Science to Standard IX CBSE Students through Value Integrated Experiential Learning” (Doctoral dissertation, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Elia-Renaud, J. (2019). “Exploring the influence of experiential learning environments on the engagement and participation of elementary-level urban students: A case study of one elementary school” (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University Boston). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mayombe, C. (2023).” Promoting youths' skills acquisition through experientia learning theory in vocational education and training in South Africa”. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Morris, T. H. (2020). “Experiential learning–a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model”. Interactive learning environments, Vol. 28 No. 8. pp.1064-1077. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wickramasinghe, S., & Upeksha, G. N. (2016, July). “Innovative and interactive teaching methods for improving learning quality in higher education.” In 2nd International Conference on Education and Distance Learning. Vol. 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tengku Sulaiman, T. S. R. M., Md Akhir, N., Mohd Isnani, Z., Zainal, N., Abd Karim, H., Amirnordin, N. A., & Ramli, Z. F. (2021). “Pembangunan diri: pemikiran kritis”. ASPIRASI FPP, pp.14-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Alkaabi, K. (2022). “Applying the Innovative Approach of Employing a Business Simulation Game and Prototype Developing Platform in an Online Flipped Classroom of an Entrepreneurial Summer Course: A Case Study of UAEU”. Education Sciences, Vol. 13 No. 1, p.13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Elsman, E. B. M., Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Beaton, D., Gagnier, J. J., Tricco, A. C., Baba, A., Butcher, N. J., Smith, M., Hofstetter, C., Lee Aiyegbusi, O., Berardi, A., Farmer, J., Haywood, K. L., Krause, K. R., Markham, S., Mayo-Wilson, E., Mehdipour, A., Ricketts, J., Szatmari, P., Touma, Z., Moher, D., & Offringa, M. (2024). Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. Quality of Life Research, 33(8), 2029-2046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03634-y. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nezameslami, R., Nezameslami, A., Mehdikhani, B., Mosavi-Jarrahi, A. & Shahbazi, A., Rahmani, A., Masoudi, A., Yeganegi, M., Akhondzardaini, R., Bahrami, M., Aghili, K., & Neamatzadeh, H. (2025). Adapting PRISMA Guidelines to enhance reporting quality in genetic association studies: A framework proposal. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Rrevention: APJCP. 26. 1641-1651. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Veroniki, A. A., Hutton, B., Stevens, A., McKenzie, J. E., Page, M. J., Moher, D., ... & Tricco, A. C. (2025). Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 23(3), 517-526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Carter-Templeton, H., Oermann, M. H., Owens, J. K., Vance, B., Mastorovich, M. L., Quazi, M., Wrigley, J., Mascaro Walter, S., Carpenter, R., & Thurman, F. (2025). Completeness of systematic reviews in nursing literature based on PRISMA reporting guidelines. ANS Advances in Nursing Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pamungkas, S. F., Widiastuti, I., & Suharno, S. (2019). ”Kolb’s experiential learning as an effective learning model in creative product and entrepreneurship subjects”. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Vocational Education (JoMEVE), Vol. 2 No. 1 .pp.27-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wiley, L. (2023). “Examining how entrepreneurial educators’ perspectives and lived experiences have shaped their pedagogical approaches in secondary education”. Pepperdine University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sathe, R., & Yu, W. (2021). “Experiential learning in the classroom: An accounting cycle simulation project”. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, Vol. 21 No. 7, pp.193-210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Fajar Pamungkas, S., Widiastuti, I., & Suharno. (2021). “Vocational student's attitude and response towards experiential learning in mechanical Engineering”. Open Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 1. pp.254-268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Butler, M. G., Church, K. S., & Spencer, A. W. (2019). “Do, reflect, think, apply: Experiential education in accounting”. Journal of Accounting Education, Vol. 48, No. C, pp.12-21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Roberts, J. (2018). “From the editor: The possibilities and limitations of experiential learning research in higher education”. Journal of Experiential Education, Vol. 41 No.1 pp.3-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Akpan, J. P., & Beard, L. A. (2016). “Using Constructivist Teaching Strategies to Enhance Academic Outcomes of Students with Special Needs”. Universal Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp.392-398. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Clark, R. W., Threeton, M. D., & Ewing, J. C. (2010). “The potential of experiential learning models and practices in career and technical education and career and technical teacher education”. Journal of Career and Technical Education, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp.46-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Konstantinou, I., & Miller, E. (2021). “Self-managed and work-based learning: problematising the workplace–classroom skills gap”. Journal of Work-Applied Management, Vol. 13 No. 1.pp.6-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Roca, J., Reguant, M., Tort, G., & Canet, O. (2020). “Developing reflective competence between simulation and clinical practice through a learning transference model: A qualitative study”. Nurse Education Today, Vol. 92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104520 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kondratjew, H., & Kahrens, M. (2019). “Leveraging experiential learning training through spaced learning. Journal of Work-Applied Management”, Vol. 11 No.1. pp.30-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Maynard, C., Garcia, J., Lucietto, A., Hutzel, W., & Newell, B. A. (2021). “Experiential Learning in the Energy Based Classroom”. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), Vol. 11 No. 6. pp. 4–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Laing, G. K. (2009). “Using a simulation activity in an introductory management accounting course to enhance learning”. Accounting, Accountability & Performance, Vol.15 No.1. pp.71-96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kandra, T. P. S. (2019). “Experiential Learning Enhances Retention of Knowledge for Long Term and Helps in Easy Recalling for Futuristic Aspect. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Green, K. (2013). “The Impact of Experiential Learning on Teacher Pedagogy and Student Achievement”. Wilmington University, Delaware. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Kong, Y. (2021). “The role of experiential learning on students’ motivation and classroom engagement”. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 771272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Yardley, S., Teunissen, P. W., & Dornan, T. (2012). “Experiential learning: AMEE guide, No. 63”. Medical Teacher, Vol. 34 No. 2, e102-e115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Cheah, K. S., & Hiew, Y. F. (2022). “Penerokaan strategi guru untuk menggalakkan pemikiran kritis dalam kalangan pelajar di dua sekolah vernakular cina, Selangor”. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp.50-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Liao, H., Fei, Y., Yang, L., & Zhang, Q. (2023). “Investigating relationships among regulated learning, teaching presence and student engagement in blended learning: An experience sampling analysis”. Education and Information Technologies, pp.1 - 29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Jasmi, K. A., & Salleh, N. (2013). “Pendekatan pengajaran dan pembelajaran berpusatkan pelajar dalam kecemerlangan guru cemerlang pendidikan Islam dan Guru di sekolah menengah: Satu kajian kes”. In 3rd International Conference on Islamic Education. pp. 6-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Ahmed, R. (2019). Experiential learning in accounting education: What is known, what needs knowing? In Proceedings of the Forum of the Australasian Accounting Academics Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ) 2019 Conference (pp. 145–162). Four A. Retrieved from https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/61364/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles