An Investigation of Students’ Perception of the Writing Process Using ChatGPT

The increasing use of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, has transformed academic writing in higher education by supporting idea generation, drafting, revision, and language improvement. However, limited research has examined learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT across different stages of the writing process. Therefore, this study investigated learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT use, their perceptions of the planning, translating, and reviewing stages of writing, and the relationship between ChatGPT and these stages. This quantitative survey study involved 186 tertiary students selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a 43-item five-point Likert scale questionnaire adapted from Raoofi et al. (2017) and Youssef et al. (2024), comprising three sections: demographic profile, writing process, and ChatGPT. The findings revealed that learners generally perceived ChatGPT positively and reported positive perceptions towards all three writing stages. Correlation analysis showed a moderate significant positive relationship between ChatGPT and planning, as well as weak significant positive relationships between ChatGPT and translating and reviewing. The findings suggest that ChatGPT functions as a complementary tool that supports learners throughout the writing process while preserving the importance of cognitive and strategic writing behaviours. The study provides insights for the effective and responsible integration of ChatGPT in higher education writing instruction.

ChatGPT, artificial intelligence, writing process, planning

1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-Learning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anthony, A., Sharma, S., & Sharma, S. (2025). Is ChatGPT the future of academic writing? A sequential explanatory study to explore generative conversational AI as an academic writing support tool for research scholars. SAGE Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676251353105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cherry Chan, S. Y. (2025). “Writing is re- writing”: Developing language awareness through a process- oriented approach in an EFL academic writing course. In Rosmawati & M. Verspoor (Eds.), English for academic and specific purposes in the classroom: From theory to practice (pp. 172-190). Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9781003471899-14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2022). The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: An overview. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 1(1), 81-83. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Di Sarno-García, S., & Argüelles-Álvarez, I. (2025). Behind my students' cover email: The role of ChatGPT in homework writing tasks. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal: LatinCALL Special Issue, 26(6), 1-20. https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/711/484 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Farazouli, A., Cerratto-Pargman, T., Sollerman, S., & Holstein, K. (2024). Hello GPT! Goodbye home assignment? An exploration of students' and teachers' experiences of ChatGPT in upper secondary education. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8227–8245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Firdaus, M., Zhang, Y., & colleagues. (2025). AI dependency and cognitive engagement in academic writing contexts. Journal of Educational Technology Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hosseini, M., Rasmussen, L. M., & Resnik, D. B. (2024). Using AI to write scholarly publications. Accountability in Research, 31(1), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hossain, M. K., & Younus, M. A. A. (2025). Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction. TESOL Communications, 4(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.58304/tc.20250103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Khairuddin,Z, Rahmat, N.H., Noor, M.M., & Khairuddin,Z. (2021) The Use of Rhetorical Strategies in Argumentative Essays. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(S3), 263-285). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Khalifa, M. & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khampusaen, D. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT on academic writing skills and knowledge: An investigation of its use in argumentative essays. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(1), 963–988. https://doi.org/10.70730/PGCQ9242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Krecar, M. I., Kolega, M., & Jurcec, L. (2024). Perception of ChatGPT usage for homework assignments: Students’ and professors’ perspectives. IAFOR Journal of Education, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.2.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Latifi, S., & Mazgutova, D. (2025). ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool: How students perceive it and how it affects their writing. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13775-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Levine, H. (2025). How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Levine, S., Beck, S. W., Mah, C., Phalen, L. & Pittman, J. (2025). How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 68(5), 445-457. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ljubojević, D. (2024). Student feedback on the effectiveness of ChatGPT for essay writing. In M. Saqr, S. López-Pernas, M. Á. Conde, M. R. Milić, & E. Kisić (Eds.), Proceedings for the 15th International Conference on e-Learning 2024, (pp. 116-126). CEUR. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3938/Paper_12.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lo Sardo, D. R, Gravino, P., Cuskley, C., & Loreto, V. (2023) Exploitation and exploration in text evolution: Quantifying planning and translation flows during writing. PLoS ONE 18(3), e0283628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283628 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students' academic writing skills: A mixed method intervention study . Smart Learning Environment, 11(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Martínez-López, R., & colleagues. (2025). Student perceptions of ChatGPT: Benefits, costs, and attitudinal differences between users and non-users toward AI integration in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13575-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mennalla, T. & Quadros-Mennalla, P. (2024). Student use, performance and perceptions of ChatGPT on college writing assignments. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice,21(1).https://open-publishing.org/journals/index.php/jutlp/article/view/712/726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rahmat, N. H. (2021) An Investigative Study of Cognitive and Metacognitive Paraphrasing Strategies in ESL Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 11(3), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/8919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Raoofi, S. Miri, A., Gharibi,J. & Malaki, B. (2017). Assessing and Validating a Writing Strategy Scale for Undergraduate Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol 8(3), pp 624-633. Retrieved from http://www.academypublication.com/issues2/jltr/vol08/03/23.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ravšelj, D., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., & colleagues. (2025). Higher education students' perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions. PLOS ONE, 20(2), e0315011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sanny, R. A., Na, K.S., & Kew, S. (2025). TESL Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions on the Use of ChatGPT in Final Year Project Writing. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (11), 327-341. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call11.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Shen, Y. (2024). Investigating Chinese learners’ use and perceptions of ChatGPT in EAP. 12th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET), 248-252, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET60671.2024.10542734. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Swanenberg, J. (2026). Writing and writing systems: Sociolinguistic aspects. In J. Stanlaw (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, (pp. 1-8). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Vetter, T.R. (2017) Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When , Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Xu, T., & Jumaat, N. F. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking in EFL writing through an AI-supported blended learning model. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(1), 1975–1994. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/24850 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Yildiz, T. A. (2025). Reducing writing anxiety in secondary school EFL learners through AI-enhanced writing instruction: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(26), 1483–1498. http://doi.org/10.18009/1697983 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yang, K., Raković, M., Liang, Z., Yan, L., Zeng, Z., Fan, Y., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2025). Modifying AI, enhancing essays: How active engagement with generative AI boosts writing quality. Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK '25), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706468.3706544 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S., & Al Malek, M. (2024) Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman,UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7 (Dec 2024), 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8,100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C.. (202) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar