E-Governance and Anti-Corruption in Ghana: Contingency, Complexity and the Institutional Accountability Gap

This study examines the role of e-governance initiatives in combating corruption within Ghana’s public sector. Employing a qualitative research approach, the investigation utilised in-depth interviews. The participants comprised public sector workers and service users who continuously use or implement e-governance systems in Ghana. The thematic analysis focused on assessing the current status of these initiatives, exploring their relationship to prevailing levels of corruption, identifying factors influencing their effectiveness and proposing strategic enhancements. Findings confirm that while e-governance systems have successfully enhanced transparency and reduced instances of petty bureaucratic corruption, their overall impact is complex and constrained by significant adoption barriers, notably low digital literacy and weak technological infrastructure. Crucially, the gains achieved through transparency are often undermined by an institutional accountability gap as evidenced by a pervasive lack of follow-up on reported corrupt activities and failure to enforce penalties. This research contributes to digital governance discourse by offering context-specific insights for policymakers on integrating technological advancements with mandatory institutional reforms to ensure the enduring effectiveness of anti-corruption strategies in Ghana and other developing countries.

e-governance, corruption, accountability, transparency

1. Al-Ababneh, M. M. (2020). Linking ontology, epistemology and research methodology. Science & Philosophy, 8(1), 75-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amoah, R., Agyekum-Boateng, P., Amakye, F., & Ocansey, E. (2026). Impact of Digital Governance Initiatives on Citizen Participation in Institutional Processes: A Case Study of the Citizens App of Ghana Gov. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 8(3), 10-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arayankalam, J., Khan, A., & Krishnan, S. (2021). How to deal with corruption? Examining the roles of e-government maturity, government administrative effectiveness, and virtual social networks diffusion. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ashaye, O. R., & Irani, Z. (2019). The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 253-270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Balaji, K. (2025). E-Government and E-Governance: Driving digital transformation in public administration. Public governance practices in the age of AI, 23-44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Carr, D. N. (2025). What Is Compliance? The Coercive Approach to Ethics Management. Public Sector Ethics (pp. 14-27). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Castro, C., & Lopes, I. C. (2023). E-government as a tool in controlling corruption. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(16), 1137-1150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cunha, S., & Camões, P. (2025). Institutional, economic and cultural safeguards against corruption: a panel study of OECD countries. Journal of Financial Crime, 32(2), 354-368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information seeking behavior and technology adoption, 205(219), 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dlamini, S., & Snyman, Z. (2026). Corruption and Fraud in Rural Southern Africa: Challenges and Countermeasures. In Rural Crime in Africa (pp. 135-157). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. de Pereira, G. A., & Charvet, E. (2025). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). In Essential Concepts for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 164-165). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. ELKheshin, S., & Saleeb, N. (2020). Assessing the adoption of e-government using TAM model: Case of Egypt. International Journal of Managing Information Technology (IJMIT), 12(1), 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government information quarterly, 22(2), 187-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Feleke, H., & Lessa, L. (2024). Maturity as a critical sustainability factor for e‐government: toward a conceptual framework. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 90(3), e12308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fon, N. N. A. (2026). Bureaucratic Corruption and Human Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Comparative Case-Study of Cameroon and Botswana. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 61(2), 1460-1484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2025). Cash versus digital payments in the public and private sectors: effects on petty versus grand corruption. Public Choice, 1-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Heeks, R. (2010). Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development?. Journal of international development, 22(5), 625-640. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Heeks, R., & Mathisen, H. (2012). Understanding success and failure of anti-corruption initiatives. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58(5), 533-549. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hilbert, M. (2011). The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy, 35(8), 715-736. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hyun, Y., & Oh, J. (2025). ICTS for Anti-Corruption: Investigating the Impact of Different ICT Tools. Journal of Economic Development, 50(4), 83-97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ibrahim, M. A. (2025). The role of e-governance techniques in audit quality: E-auditing as a model. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 31(149), 92-113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kogueda, F. B., & Manga Engama, E. (2026). Digital public governance and corruption: Analysis of a two-way relationship in Africa. International Political Science Review, 47(1), 42-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kuuyelleh, E. N., Akanpaadgi, E., & Korley, B. (2025). Digital Governance in Ghana: Exploring the Prospects and Constraints. In Digitalisation and Public Policy in Africa: GovTech and CivicTech Innovations (pp. 225-250). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mensah, I. K., & Adams, S. (2020). A comparative analysis of the impact of political trust on the adoption of E-Government services. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 682-696. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). Corruption: Good governance powers innovation. Nature, 518(7539), 295-297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Munshi, M., & Manni, U. H. (2025). Can Digital Transformation Reduce Government Corruption? A Meta-Analysis. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 6(1), 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. O’Higgins, E. R. (2017). Corruption in Extractive Industries–Changing the Scenario?. In The Handbook of Business and Corruption: Cross-Sectoral Experiences (pp. 179-208). Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Paul, C., & Adams, S. O. (2024). The effect of e-government development indices (EGDI) on corruption perception index in sub-Sahara Africa: A panel data analysis. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 16(1), 17-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Reed, Q., & Fontana, A. (2011). Corruption and illicit financial flows: The limits and possibilities of current approaches. U4 Issue, 2011(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2008). Corruption. In Readings in public choice and constitutional political economy (pp. 551-566). Boston, MA: Springer US. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Oduro, B. K., & Agbevade, A. (2026). The Role of E‐Governance in Promoting Government Accountability and Transparency in Ghana. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 92(2), e70053. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sharmin, S., & Chowdhury, R. H. (2025). Digital transformation in governance: The impact of e-governance on public administration and transparency. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(1), 362-379. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 298-316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Srivastava, S. K., Srivastava, P. R., & Zhang, J. Z. (2024). E-government and corruption: is accountability a bridge?. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce, 34(1), 46-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Watkins, T. A. (2025). Public corruption in Ghana and its influence on monetary and fiscal policymaking. Available at SSRN 5324634. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zook, S., Adjei‐Bamfo, P., Monroe‐White, T., & Bawole, J. N. (2026). e‐Government Adoption in Ghana: Structural Conditions and Employee Affective Orientation. Public Administration Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
• Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
• Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
• Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
• The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark