Beyond Independence: Auditor Competency, Audit Quality and Fraud Detection in Public Sector Internal Auditing

Purpose
This study aims to examine the influence of auditor competency, auditor independence and audit quality on internal audit effectiveness in detecting fraud within Malaysian public sector organisations.
Design/methodology/approach
The research design employed is quantitative research design using data collected from a sample of internal auditors from Malaysian public sector organisations. The data was collected by means of a questionnaire survey from a sample of internal auditors from various government ministries, departments, and statutory bodies. The total sample size for this research is 210. The data collected has been analyzed using various quantitative data analysis techniques such as descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis. To ensure methodological rigor of the research, additional tests such as Harman’s single factor test for common method bias and VIF test for multicollinearity have also been conducted.
Findings
The results show that auditor competency and audit quality are significant determinants of internal audit effectiveness in the detection of fraud, while auditor independence does not show a statistically significant relationship with internal audit effectiveness in the detection of fraud. Audit quality is found to be the most significant predictor of fraud detection capability, which implies that audit procedures and processes of evaluation are very significant in enhancing the internal audit capability of detecting fraud in the processes of the organisation.
Research limitations/implications
The focus of the study is internal auditors who operate within public sector organisations in Malaysia, and as such, the results may not be universally applicable. Another limitation is that the study is based on perceptions and not direct observation of fraud detection practices.
Practical implications
In addition, the policymakers and government agencies should invest in specialized training programmes on fraud detection techniques. Moreover, strengthening the audit quality framework and implementing stringent audit procedures also contribute to fraud detection capabilities.
Originality/value
The study contributes to the internal auditing literature in that it provides empirical evidence on the factors that affect internal audit effectiveness in detecting fraud in the public sector in an emerging economy, thereby refuting the conventional wisdom that internal audit effectiveness depends on internal audit independence. It also provides empirical evidence that internal audit professional competency and audit quality are more critical success factors in improving internal audit effectiveness in detecting fraud.

Internal auditing; fraud detection; audit quality; auditor competency

1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2012). Internal audit assistance and external audit timeliness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 3–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adams, M. B. (1994). Agency theory and the internal audit. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8), 8–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alzeban, A., & Gwilliam, D. (2014). Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: Evidence from the Saudi public sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2), 74–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2009). Identifying organisational drivers of internal audit effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing, 13(1), 43–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2022). Report to the nations: Global study on occupational fraud and abuse. ACFE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Badara, M. S., & Saidin, S. Z. (2013). The journey so far on internal audit effectiveness: A calling for expansion. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 3(3), 340–351. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441–454. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Raghunandan, K. (2005). Factors associated with U.S. public companies’ investment in internal auditing. Accounting Horizons, 19(2), 69–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cohen, A., & Sayag, G. (2010). The effectiveness of internal auditing: An empirical examination of its determinants in Israeli organisations. Australian Accounting Review, 20(3), 296–307. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Coram, P., Ferguson, C., & Moroney, R. (2008). Internal audit, alternative internal audit structures and the level of misappropriation of assets fraud. Accounting & Finance, 48(4), 543–559. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dellai, H., & Omri, M. A. (2016). Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness in Tunisian organisations. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(16), 208–221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Drogalas, G., Karagiorgos, T., & Arampatzis, K. (2017). Factors associated with internal audit effectiveness: Evidence from Greece. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(4/5), 428–444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Endaya, K. A., & Hanefah, M. M. (2013). Internal audit effectiveness: An approach proposition to develop the theoretical framework. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(10), 92–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gwilliam, D., & Alzeban, A. (2015). Perceptions of managers and internal auditors as to factors affecting the effectiveness of internal audit in the public sector context. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(6/7), 560–581. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Ling, H. (2008). Evidence on the impact of internal control and corporate governance on audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 12(1), 9–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hermanson, D. R., & Rittenberg, L. E. (2003). Internal audit and organisational governance. Internal Auditor, 60(6), 37–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Institute of Internal Auditors. (2020). International professional practices framework (IPPF). The Institute of Internal Auditors. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kabuye, F., Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Opiso, J., & Nakabuye, Z. (2017). Internal audit organisational status, competencies, activities and fraud management in the financial services sector. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(9), 924–944. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Karagiorgos, T., Drogalas, G., Eleftheriadis, I., & Christodoulou, P. (2010). Internal audit contribution to efficiency of internal control systems. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(9), 873–889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mihret, D. G., & Yismaw, A. W. (2007). Internal audit effectiveness: An Ethiopian public sector case study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(5), 470–484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nguyen, T. Q., Nguyen, H. T., & Tran, M. D. (2024). Internal audit effectiveness and fraud prevention: Evidence from public sector organisations. Journal of Financial Crime. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pagalung, G. (2022). Auditor competence and fraud detection capability. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 18(4), 587–604. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Petrașcu, D., & Tieanu, A. (2014). The role of internal audit in fraud prevention and detection. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2020). Global economic crime and fraud survey 2020. PwC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rittenberg, L., & Schwieger, B. (2005). Auditing: A business risk approach. Thomson South-Western. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sarens, G., & De Beelde, I. (2006). Internal auditors’ perception about their role in risk management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(1), 63–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sarens, G., & De Beelde, I. (2009). Internal auditing research: Where are we going? International Journal of Auditing, 13(1), 1–7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Shamsuddin, A., Manjie, A., & Mohamed, N. (2015). Internal audit effectiveness in the public sector. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 6, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Singh, K., Boolaky, P., & Omoteso, K. (2022). Corporate governance and fraud risk in public sector organisations. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 841–856. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Spraakman, G. (1997). Transaction cost economics: A theory for internal auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 12(7), 323–330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Stewart, J., & Subramaniam, N. (2010). Internal audit independence and objectivity: Emerging research opportunities. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(4), 328–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ta, V., & Doan, T. (2022). Determinants of internal audit effectiveness. Journal of Financial Crime. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Van Peursem, K. (2005). Conversations with internal auditors: The power of ambiguity. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(5), 489–512. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zahari, A. I., Said, J., & Muhamad, N. (2022). Fraud risk management in public sector governance. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors