Humour, Morality, and Power: The Normalization of Hate Speech Against LGBTQ Representation in Malaysia

This study examines how public discourse on social media in Malaysia functions as a mechanism for normalising hate speech against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) representation in mainstream media. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s Normalization Theory (1977), it explores how humour, religious moralisation, cultural identity, and political instrumentalisation collectively reinforce heteronormative norms and regulate non-conforming identities. Using a qualitative thematic content analysis approach, 455 public Facebook comments responding to MalaysiaKini’s post about LGBTQ visibility at the 25th Anugerah Juara Lagu (AJL) were examined. Findings reveal that 35.8% of the comments contained hate elements, with 49.7% reflecting normalisation processes. Four interconnected discursive mechanisms were identified: (1) humour and sarcasm, which disguise hostility as entertainment; (2) religious rhetoric, which legitimises exclusion through moral policing; (3) cultural and national identity framing, which positions LGBTQ identities as threats to Malay-Muslim traditions; and (4) political instrumentalisation, where LGBTQ issues are weaponised to delegitimise political opponents. These mechanisms often overlap, forming a discursive network that sustains social hierarchies by blending ridicule, moral judgment, patriotism, and political rhetoric. The findings indicate that hate speech in Malaysia’s digital spaces operates subtly, embedding prejudice within everyday discourse under the guise of humour, religion, and nationalism. The study contributes to sociological understandings of how normalisation processes perpetuate exclusionary ideologies, offering insights into the interplay between media, culture, and power. It recommends culturally sensitive content moderation, inclusive digital literacy initiatives, and further research on counter-discourses across other social media platforms.

LGBTQ representation, Normalization Theory, hate speech, public discourse

1. Adam, B. D., Duyvendak, J. W., & Krouwel, A. (1999). The Global Emergence of Gay and Lesbian Politics: National Imprints of a Worldwide Movement. Temple University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, K. (2021). Zoom-ing in on white supremacy: Zoom-bombing anti-racism efforts. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture, 24(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bekturovna, C. N., & Syrtbaevna, M. T. (2024). Political discourse and its role in shaping public opinion. Alatoo Academic Studies, 1, 277-290. https://doi.org/10.17015/aas.2024.241.25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and Ridicule: Toward a Social Critique of Humour. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Toward a social critique of humour. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Carvalho, P., Caled, D., Silva, C., Batista, F., & Ribeiro, R. (2024). The expression of hate speech against Afro-descendant, Roma, and LGBTQ+ communities in YouTube comments. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 12(2), 171-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chavez, J. V., Lamorinas, D. D., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023, July). Message patterns of online gender-based humor discriminatory practices biases stereotyping and disempowering tools through discourse analysis. In Forum for Linguistic Studies (Transferred) (Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 1535-1535). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chin, G. (2023). Political Rhetoric and LGBTQ Identity in Malaysia: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Southeast Asian Journal of Political Studies, 18(3), 221-243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Encarnación, O. G. (2016). Out in the Periphery: Latin America's Gay Rights Revolution. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ferreyra, E. (2022). LGBTQ+ Representation in Fictional Podcast Series. Literatura Ludowa, 66(2), 13-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Random House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Foucault, M. (2023). Discipline and punish. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 291-299). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gash, A., Tichenor, D., Chavez, A., & Musselman, M. (2020). Framing kids: Children, immigration reform, and same-sex marriage. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 8(1), 44-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hayman, K. (2024). A discourse of hate: A content analysis of responses to queer representation in online social media. Canadian Journal of Family and Youth/Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse, 16(1), 109-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kim, L. (2024). The Role of Religion in Shaping Social Attitudes towards LGBTQ+ Rights. Journal of Advanced Sociology, 5(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.47941/jas.1855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication theory, 10(3), 310-331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humour as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humour in Communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mohamad, N., & Kassim, M. (2019). LGBTQ and National Identity in Malaysia: A Historical Perspective. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 89-103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mohd Noor, A. (2020). Islamic Discourse and the Regulation of LGBTQ Rights in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Studies, 31(2), 178-195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Monaghan, W. (2021). Post-gay television: LGBTQ representation and the negotiation of ‘normal’in MTV’s Faking It. Media, Culture & Society, 43(3), 428-443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Munsalud, E.E., Ramos, M.C., Reyes, A.A., & Gochuico, J.V. (2024). Depiction of Oppression of the LGBTQ+ Community in the Dialogues of the Youtube Film Series “Sakristan”. Academia Lasalliana Journal of Education and Humanities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nie, X. (2024). The impact of internet slang on social power structures: An analysis through Foucault's theory. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 45(IMPES2024). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nurochman, A., & Al-Hamdi, R. (2024). Impact of hate speech in digital media on pre-election public opinion. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 8(3), 607-616. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ocampo, N. B., Sviridova, E., Cabrio, E., & Villata, S. (2023). An in-depth analysis of implicit and subtle hate speech messages. In EACL 2023-17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 2023, pp. 1997-2013). Association for Computational Linguistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rahman, N. A., Sazan, D., Yusoff, M. Z. N. M., Zaini, M. F. H., & Razzaq, N. (2024). Visual Representation of Selected Malaysian Political Trolling on Social Media: Disclose the Ideology and Power. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(5), 1538-1549. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rao, R. (2020). Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Postcoloniality. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Saidin, M. I. S., & Azrun, N. (2024). Digital Media and Religious Sentiments in Malaysia: Critical Discourse Analysis of Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party and Democratic Action Party Cyberspace Campaigns in the 15th General Election. Religions, 15(8), 920. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Silva, C., & Carvalho, P. (2023). When can compliments and humour be considered hate speech? A perspective from target groups in Portugal. Comunicação e sociedade, (43), e023006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Siraj, A. (2012). "I Don't Want to Taint the Name of Islam": The Influence of Religion on the Lives of Muslim Lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 16(4), 449-467. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sofian, M. R. M., & Azmawati, A. A. (2021). Wacana Kontroversi Agama di Malaysia: Satu Kajian Terhadap Pelaporan Akhbar Utusan Malaysia dan The Star Mengenai Tuntutan COMANGO. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(1), 80-95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Soral, W., Liu, J., & Bilewicz, M. (2020). Media of contempt: Social media consumption predicts normative acceptance of anti-Muslim hate speech and islamoprejudice. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 14, 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Spasova, L. (2017). The New Media and Social Networks as a factor in the process of Radicalization and Normalization of Hate Crimes. Postmodernism Problems, 7(3), 235-249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Syahputra, I. (2017). Post Media Literacy: Menyaksikan Kuasa Media Bersama Michel Foucault. Jurnal Aspikom, 1(1), 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Tan, K. K. (2022). “We Do Not Want to Punish, We Just Want to Educate”: A Scoping Review of Attitudes Towards LGBTQ Among Malaysians. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 22(4), 9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Tsirbas, Y., & Zirganou-Kazolea, L. (2024). Hate speech mainstreaming in the Greek virtual public sphere: A quantitative and qualitative approach. Communications, (0). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Unlu, A., & Kotonen, T. (2024). Online polarization and identity politics: An analysis of Facebook discourse on Muslim and LGBTQ+ communities in Finland. Scandinavian political studies, 47(2), 199-231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vera-Revilla, C.Y., Grundy-López, R.E., Flores-Vilca, I.V., García-Toledo, L.C., Gutiérrez-Aguilar, O.A., & Duche-Pérez, A.B. (2024). The Convergence of Power: Exploring the Intersection between Politics, Communication, and Religion. International Journal of Religion. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Waggoner, E. B. (2018). Bury your gays and social media fan response: Television, LGBTQ representation, and communitarian ethics. Journal of homosexuality, 65(13), 1877-1891. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Wan, H., & Ibrahim, S. (2022). Political Islam and LGBTQ Rights in Malaysia: A Comparative Study of Rhetoric and Policy. Asian Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 56-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Xia, C., Rasoulikolamaki, S., & Jalalian Daghigh, A. (2024). A critical enthymematic deconstruction of anti/pro LGBTQ+ arguments on Malaysian social media. Discourse & Society, 09579265241307392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study