Strategic Antecedents of Sustainable Procurement: The Synergistic Impact of Supplier Relationship Management, Digital Transformation, and Ethical Sourcing

Authors

Abdul Rais Sutrisno

Faculty of Bsuiness and Management,Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam (Malaysia)

Ariff Azly Muhamed

Faculty of Bsuiness and Management,Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam (Malaysia)

Habiel Zakariah

Faculty of Bsuiness and Management,Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam (Malaysia)

Mohd Zamri Abu Bakar

Faculty of Bsuiness and Management,Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam (Malaysia)

Mazuin Mat Halif

Faculty of Bsuiness and Management,Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700035

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 464-468

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-04

Accepted: 2026-07-09

Published: 2026-07-23

Abstract

In contemporary global markets, the strategic integration of procurement and logistics is essential for enhancing supply chain efficiency, mitigating operational risks, and ensuring environmental sustainability. Despite its importance, achieving seamless synchronization remains challenging, requiring a nuanced approach to supplier selection, cost control, and green logistics. This conceptual paper addresses these operational hurdles by developing a comprehensive theoretical framework that identifies the primary strategic drivers of sustainable procurement efficacy. Drawing upon a synthesis of existing literature, the study proposes a structural model comprising three critical strategic antecedents: Supplier Relationship Management (SRM), Digital Transformation, and Ethical Sourcing. The paper formulates three testable propositions (P1–P3), positing that cultivating collaborative, long-term supplier partnerships, leveraging advanced digital technologies for data-driven decision-making, and prioritizing stringent ethical and social responsibility standards directly enhance procurement performance and sustainable supply chain outcomes. Theoretically, this research advances the supply chain management discourse by transitioning from generalized best practices to a specific, testable model, providing a clear pathway for future empirical investigation. Managerially, the proposed tri-pillar framework offers a strategic blueprint for organizations to absorb market shocks, optimize overarching logistical expenditures, and meet escalating regulatory and consumer demands for corporate social responsibility. Ultimately, this article establishes that integrating relational capabilities, digital innovation, and ethical commitments is vital for long-term, sustainable procurement success.

Keywords

Sustainable procurement, supplier relationship management, digital transformation, ethical sourcing, supply chain sustainability.

Downloads

References

1. P. M. da S. Schiffini, I. S. Rampasso, T. F. A. C. Sigahi, G. H. S. M. de Moraes, and R. Anholon, “Sustainable procurement in higher education institutions: a Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for hierarchization of barriers,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 2025, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-07-2024-0483. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. H. Thies and K. Stanoevska-Slabeva, “Critical success factors for sustainable business networks,” 18th Am. Conf. Inf. Syst. 2012, AMCIS 2012, vol. 6, no. July, pp. 4322–4332, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. E. Peters, L. Knight, K. Boersma, and N. Uenk, “Organizing for supply chain resilience: a high reliability network perspective,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 48–69, 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2022-0167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. E. Karttunen, K. Lintukangas, and J. Hallikas, “Digital transformation of the purchasing and supply management process,” Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., vol. 53, no. 5–6, pp. 685–706, 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2022-0199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. M. C. Georgiadou, “An overview of benefits and challenges of building information modelling (BIM) adoption in UK residential projects,” Constr. Innov., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 298–320, 2019, doi: 10.1108/CI-04-2017-0030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. P. Kouvelis, L. Dong, O. Boyabatli, and R. Li, The Handbook of Integrated Risk Management in Global Supply Chains. 2011. doi: 10.1002/9781118115800. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Yang Liu, Q. Zhu, and S. Seuring, “Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 187, no. December 2015, pp. 182–195, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. H. M. Wee and S. Wu, “Lean supply chain and its effect on product cost and quality: a case study on Ford Motor Company,” Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 335–341, 2009, doi: 10.1108/13598540910980242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. R. Dubey, A. Gunasekaran, S. J. Childe, T. Papadopoulos, and P. Helo, “Supplier relationship management for circular economy: Influence of external pressures and top management commitment,” Manag. Decis., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 767–790, 2019, doi: 10.1108/MD-04-2018-0396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. S. K. A. Cheah and B. Low, “The impact of public policy marketing, institutional narratives and discourses on renewable energy consumption in a developing economy,” Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logist., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 944–962, 2022, doi: 10.1108/APJML-11-2020-0835. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. V. K. Mittal and K. S. Sangwan, “Development of a structural model of environmentally conscious manufacturing drivers,” J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1195–1208, 2014, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.838649. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. T. Jambulingam and R. Kathuria, “Antecedents to buyer-supplier coordination in the pharmaceutical supply chain,” Int. J. Pharm. Healthc. Mark., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 289–303, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJPHM-08-2019-0058. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. J. D. Wisner, “A Structural Equation Model of Supply Chain Management Strategies and Firm Performance,” J. Bus. Logist., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2003, doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00030.x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. A. Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, J. Carlos Omodei Junior, and C. José Chiappetta Jabbour, “Extending lean manufacturing in supply chains: a successful case in Brazil,” Benchmarking An Int. J., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1070–1083, 2014, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-01-2013-0014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. L. Lao, Z. Li, S. Hou, B. Xiao, S. Guo, and Y. Yang, “A survey of IoT applications in blockchain systems: Architecture, consensus, and traffic modeling,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 53, no. 1. 2020. doi: 10.1145/3372136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. B. Ocicka, “How a Digital Platform Transforms the Value Proposition in Purchasing and Buyer-Supplier Relationship Management,” Eur. Res. Stud. J., vol. XXIV, no. Issue 4, pp. 44–56, 2021, doi: 10.35808/ersj/2561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. G. Svensson and H. Bååth, “Supply chain management ethics: conceptual framework and illustration,” Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 398–405, 2008, doi: 10.1108/13598540810905651. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. R. Joshi, D. K. Banwet, and R. Shankar, “A Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS based benchmarking framework for performance improvement of a cold chain,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 10170–10182, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.072. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. R. Joshi, D. K. Banwet, R. Shankar, and J. Gandhi, “Performance improvement of cold chain in an emerging economy,” Prod. Plan. Control, vol. 23, no. 10–11, pp. 817–836, 2012, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2011.642187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. N. N. Abd Rahim, M. Z. Abu Bakar, A. A. Muhamed, M. Mat Halif, and M. F. Hassan, “The Relationship Between Marketing Mix and Customer Loyalty among Malaysian Smartphone Users,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 2270–2276, 2022, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i1/12196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. A. A. Muhamed, N. Salim, M. N. Ab Rahman, F. M. Hamzah, and M. H. Ali, “Effects of supply chain orientation on firm performance: insights from a Malaysian case study of halal-certified small and medium-sized enterprises,” J. Small Bus. Entrep., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–17, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1080/08276331.2020.1848328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles