Community-Based Knowledge Transfer and the Sustainability of RSPO Certification among Independent Oil Palm Smallholder in Malaysia

Authors

Raudah Sulaiman

Faculty of Applied Social Science, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nik Nur Azizah Nik Halman

Faculty of Applied Social Science, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu (Malaysia)

Hafis Simin

Faculty of Applied Social Science, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu (Malaysia)

Najah Tuah

Faculty of Applied Social Science, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nadiah Mohideen

Faculty of Applied Social Science, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700059

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 809-821

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-05

Accepted: 2026-07-10

Published: 2026-07-23

Abstract

Sustainable certification schemes such as the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) depend on continuous knowledge transfer processes to ensure meaningful compliance among smallholders. However, for independent oil palm smallholders, sustaining certification remains challenging due to limited access to technical knowledge and difficulties in translating global sustainability standards into local practices. This study examines community-based knowledge transfer processes that support the sustainability of RSPO certification among independent smallholders in Malaysia. A qualitative case study design was adopted, involving in-depth interviews with smallholders and key stakeholders, supported by field observations and document analysis. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo 14 to examine how certification knowledge is transferred, translated into locally meaningful practices and operationalized through everyday farming and administrative activities. Findings demonstrate that knowledge transfer is a socially embedded and iterative process rather than a linear flow of information. It occurs through training interactions, peer learning, experiential demonstrations and continuous translation of certification requirements into contextually meaningful practices. These processes enable gradual internalisation of sustainability standards within both farming and administrative routines. However, effectiveness is shaped by uneven participation, literacy constraints and differential access to learning opportunities. The study contributes to sustainability certification and social innovation literature by conceptualising knowledge transfer as a dynamic, relational process that bridges global governance standards and local agricultural practices.

Keywords

RSPO Certification, Knowledge Transfer, Independent Smallholders, Sustainability Certification, Community Learning

Downloads

References

1. Abdullah, M. H. S. B., Shahimi, S., & Arifin, A. (2022). Independent smallholders' perceptions towards MSPO certification in Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Management/Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 28(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad Rizal, A. R., Md Nordin, S., Hussin, S. H., & Hussin, S. R. (2021). Beyond rational choice theory: Multifaceted determinants of participation in palm oil sustainable certification amongst smallholders in Malaysia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 638296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aziz, N. F., Chamhuri, N., & Batt, P. J. (2021). Barriers and benefits arising from the adoption of sustainable certification for smallholder oil palm producers in Malaysia: A systematic review of literature. Sustainability, 13(18), 10009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Degli Innocenti, E., & Oosterveer, P. (2020). Opportunities and bottlenecks for upstream learning within RSPO certified palm oil value chains: A comparative analysis between Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. De Vos, R. E., Suwarno, A., Slingerland, M., Van Der Meer, P. J., & Lucey, J. M. (2021). Independent oil palm smallholder management practices and yields: Can RSPO certification make a difference? Environmental Research Letters, 16(6), 065015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Klerkx, L., & Rose, D. (2020). Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? Global Food Security, 24, 100347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Rizal, A. R. A., & Nordin, S. M. (2022). Smallholders participation in sustainable certification: The mediating impact of deliberative communication and responsible leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 978993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Tey, Y. S., Brindal, M., Darham, S., Sidique, S. F. A., & Djama, M. (2020). Factors influencing sustainability certification among plantation companies in Malaysia: A panel approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 22, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Tey, Y. S., Brindal, M., Hadi, A. H. I. A., & Darham, S. (2022). Financial costs and benefits of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil certification among independent smallholders: A probabilistic view of the Monte Carlo approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Veriasa, T. O., Nurrunisa, M., & Fadhli, N. (2024). Revisiting the implications of RSPO smallholder certification relative to farm productivity in Riau, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 8(1), 123–139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Zachlod, N., Hudecheck, M., Sirén, C., & George, G. (2025). Sustainable palm oil certification inadvertently affects production efficiency in Malaysia. Communications Earth & Environment, 6(1), 200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles