The Impact of Government Policy Shifts and Uncertainty on Strategic Decision-Making in Multinational Enterprises in Ghana
Authors
Department of Management Studies, Valley View University, Oyibi (Ghana)
Department of Management Studies, Valley View University, Oyibi (Ghana)
Department of Management Studies, Valley View University, Oyibi (Ghana)
Department of Management Studies, Valley View University, Oyibi (Ghana)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601466
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 21333-21346
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-08
Accepted: 2026-07-13
Published: 2026-07-25
Abstract
One of the most serious and intractable problems faced by multinational corporations (MNCs) in modern global markets is policy uncertainty and shifts. This paper examines the strategic decision-making frameworks that companies adopt in response to uncertain policy environments shaped by regulatory shifts, geopolitical turbulence, and evolving trade structures. Drawing on a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed sources published between 2021 and 2026, contextualised against seminal pre-2021 theoretical foundations, the paper applies a documented quality appraisal and thematic synthesis protocol to integrate theoretical and empirical scholarship across the Real Options Theory, Institutional Theory, and Dynamic Capabilities frameworks. The central thesis is that no single adaptive stance is sufficient to drive an effective strategic response to policy uncertainty; rather, a combination of organizational flexibility, institutional intelligence, and political risk governance is required. The analysis identifies ongoing tensions between the drive for operational efficiency and the strategic value of reversibility, and between firm agency and the structural constraints imposed by institutions. By synthesizing emergent contributions on uncertainty governance and extending dynamic capabilities logic into the domain of political risk, the paper proposes an Integrated Uncertainty Governance (IUG) framework, presented in detail with its component mechanisms, interdependencies, and boundary conditions, and evaluated explicitly against Real Options Theory, Institutional Theory, and Dynamic Capabilities, as its central theoretical contribution. The paper concludes by outlining implications for theory, policy, and managerial practice, with particular attention to regional economic integration and investment climate reform, and identifying directions for future empirical research.
Keywords
Policy Uncertainty; Multinational Corporations; Strategic Decision-Making; Dynamic Capabilities; Political Risk; Real Options Theory; Institutional Theory; Systematic Literature Review
Downloads
References
1. Ahir, H., Bloom, N., & Furceri, D. (2022). The world uncertainty index. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 29763. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Barbar, J. (2025). Government ownership in the MENA region: The roles of institutional voids, sociocultural norms and control-enhancing mechanisms. Corporate Governance, 25(8), 68–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2024-0068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bloom, N. (2023). Fluctuations in uncertainty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.37.1.153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11%3C1105::AID-SMJ133%3E3.0.CO;2-E [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Evenett, S., Frenkel, R., & Hoekman, B. (2022). Supply chain disruption and firms' responses to geopolitical risk. World Economy, 45(10), 3148–3178. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13286 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Fainshmidt, S., Witt, M. A., Aguilera, R. V., & Verbeke, A. (2022). The MNE and varieties of capitalism: Revisiting the nexus of national institutions and competitive advantage. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(9), 1949–1974. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00516-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Gao, G. Y., Wang, D. T., & Che, Y. (2021). Impact of historical conflict on FDI location and performance: Japanese investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00395-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2022). Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. Journal of Finance, 77(1), 45–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kobrin, S. J. (1979). Political risk: A review and reconsideration. Journal of International Business Studies, 10(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490631 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kobrin, S. J. (2022). How geopolitics is changing global business. Journal of International Business Policy, 5(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-022-00149-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kostova, T., Marano, V., & Tallman, S. (2022). MNCs: Intra-firm conflicts and conflict resolution across three levels: Groups, countries, and headquarters. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(2), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00490-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabić, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Piñeiro-Chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios-Marqués, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16, 2577–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Li, J., & Rugman, A. M. (2021). Real options and the theory of foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 30(1), Article 101756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101756 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Liedong, T. A., Peprah, A. A., Amartey, A. O., & Rajwani, T. (2022). A systematic review of corporate political activity research: Toward a conceptual framework. Journal of Management, 48(2), 263–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (2023). Collapsing multilateralism and the new global trade order. Annual Review of Political Science, 26, 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-105003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., & Collings, D. G. (2022). Global talent management and the emerging market challenge. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(1), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00456-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Teece, D. J. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. Journal of Management, 49(6), 2016–2040. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221097847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097–0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Tong, T. W., Li, S., & Li, J. (2023). Real options and strategic management: Current developments and challenges. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. UNCTAD. (2023). World investment report 2023: Investing in sustainable energy for all. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/wir2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria