Psychological and Socio-Cultural Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration Among Albanian Men: A Comparative Study of Perpetrators and University Students
Authors
Office for Men and Boys (ZDB), Shkoder (Albania)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700103
Subject Category: Psychology
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 1437-1445
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-12
Accepted: 2026-07-17
Published: 2026-07-27
Abstract
Understanding the factors associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration is essential for developing effective prevention strategies and evidence-informed intervention programmes. Although substantial research has examined the consequences of IPV for victims, comparatively less attention has been devoted to identifying the psychological and socio-cultural characteristics associated with violent behaviour among men, particularly within transitional societies such as Albania. This study investigates the psychological and socio-cultural predictors of intimate partner violence perpetration among Albanian men through a comparative analysis of perpetrators and university students. A quantitative, descriptive-comparative research design was employed using the Gender-Equitable Men (GEM) Scale to assess attitudes, beliefs, and gender-related norms associated with violent behaviour. The study included a total sample of 100 male participants, comprising 50 perpetrators enrolled in rehabilitation programmes and 50 male university students. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, independent-samples t-tests, Pearson correlation analysis, and one-way ANOVA. The findings indicate that psychological factors represent the strongest predictors associated with IPV perpetration, while socio-cultural factors, particularly inequitable gender norms and traditional beliefs regarding male authority, also contribute significantly to violent behaviour. Perpetrators demonstrated significantly more traditional gender attitudes than university students across several dimensions measured by the GEM Scale. Educational attainment was associated with more equitable gender attitudes and appeared to reduce the influence of psychological and socio-cultural risk factors related to violence. These findings contribute to the limited empirical literature on perpetrator characteristics in Albania and highlight the importance of integrating psychological assessment with gender-transformative approaches in perpetrator intervention programmes. The study offers practical implications for psychologists, social workers, justice institutions, and policymakers seeking to strengthen evidence-based strategies for the prevention of intimate partner violence.
Keywords
intimate partner violence; perpetrators; psychological predictors; socio-cultural factors
Downloads
References
1. Flood, M. (2019). Engaging men and boys in violence prevention. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004003002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Jewkes, R., Flood, M., & Lang, J. (2015). From work with men and boys to changes in social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: A conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet, 385(9977), 1580–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61683-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Kelly, L., & Westmarland, N. (2015). Domestic violence perpetrator programmes: Steps towards change. Project Mirabal final report. London Metropolitan University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Levtov, R., Kaufman, M., Barker, G., et al. (2022). State of the world's fathers 2022: Transforming masculinities for care and equality. Equimundo. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Pulerwitz, J., & Barker, G. (2008). Measuring attitudes toward gender norms among young men in Brazil: Development and psychometric evaluation of the Gender-Equitable Men (GEM) Scale. Men and Masculinities, 10(3), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X06298778 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Sardinha, L., Maheu-Giroux, M., Stöckl, H., Meyer, S. R., & García-Moreno, C. (2022). Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women. The Lancet, 399(10327), 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. United Nations Women. (2023). Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The gender snapshot 2023. UN Women. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Work With Perpetrators European Network. (2018). Guidelines to develop standards for programmes working with male perpetrators of domestic violence. WWP EN. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
- Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
- A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
- Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
- A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being