How the Absence of Teacher Appraisal Systems Affects Student Performance in Lusaka District, Zambia

Teacher appraisal systems support instructional quality and student learning but are unevenly implemented in Zambia (UNESCO, 2014; MoGE, 2021). This convergent mixed methods study compared student outcomes across secondary schools in Lusaka District with and without formal appraisal frameworks. Quantitative analysis of archival examination and attendance data showed higher mean pass rates and attendance where appraisal existed (ΔR² = .08 for appraisal presence predicting exam scores after controls). Thematic interviews with teachers and headteachers identified weakened accountability, limited reflective practice, and ad hoc compensatory strategies in non-appraisal schools (Fullan, 2001; Danielson, 2007). Together, results indicate that formal, context-sensitive appraisal mechanisms strengthen instructional accountability and professional growth, improving student engagement and attainment. Policy implications call for the Ministry of Education to co-design phased appraisal guidelines that combine formative feedback, capacity building, and practical incentives (Darling Hammond et al., 2016; OECD, 2013).

Teacher appraisal systems; Student performance; Professional development; Accountability

1. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What makes it Special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ball, S. J., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Performing Education: Accountability and Performativity in the Globalizing School. Journal of Education Policy, 23(1), 99–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to Improve: How America’s Schools can get Better at Getting Better. Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E. L., McIntyre, A., Sato, M., & Zeichner, K. (2016). Teacher Appraisal and Feedback (Policy Brief). UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning. https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/library/teacher-appraisal-and-feedback [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2016). Effective Teacher Evaluation Systems: A Guide for District Leaders. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs: Principles and Practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change (3rd Ed.). London, UK: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Isoré, M. (2009). Teacher Appraisal: Exploring its Conceptual Frames. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 19. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Isoré, M. (2009). Teacher Evaluation: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review (OECD Education Working Papers No. 23). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/223283631428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. (2016). Can Principals Promote Teacher Development as Evaluators? A Case Study of Principals’ Views and Experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(5), 711–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16653445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. F. (2016). Can Teacher Evaluation Improve Teaching? Experimental Evidence from Skills Training. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 971–1004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kvale, S. (2007). Doing Interviews. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ministry of General Education. (2021). Standards of Practice for the Teaching Profession in Zambia. Lusaka, Zambia: Author. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ministry of General Education. (2021). Teacher Appraisal Guidelines. Government of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ministry of General Education [MoGE]. (2021). Teacher Performance Management and Development Guidelines. Lusaka, Zambia: Government of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Synergies for Better Learning: An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Republic of Zambia, Ministry of General Education. (2018). Teacher Education and Development Standards. Government of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2nd Ed.). Zed Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th Ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Ministry of Education, New Zealand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. UNESCO. (2014). Teacher Development for Inclusive Education: The Impact of Digital Tools. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. UNESCO International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa (IICBA). (2013). Quality Teachers for EFA: Enhancing Teacher Education for bridging the Quality Gap in Sub-Saharan Africa: Progress report July 2013. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Author. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. UNESCO International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa [UNESCO-IICBA]. (2013). Strengthening Teacher Appraisal Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: UNESCO-IICBA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study