Exploring the Relationship Between Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Components in Motivational Beliefs

Self-regulated learning strategies and motivational beliefs are considered to be contributing factors in determining students’ learning capacity. However, the relationship between the two variables are not commonly written in the realm of academia. It is of the best interest of learners that they incorporate self-regulated learning strategies and have high motivational beliefs in order to accomplish tasks in classes. Understanding the relationship between self-regulated learning strategies and motivational beliefs is essential for fostering effective learning. Researchers are addressing the need for a clearer understanding of how students' perceptions of their motivation would impact their ability to regulate their learning and the findings will provide insights into how educators can better support students in developing both the confidence and strategies necessary for academic success. This study aims to explore motivational factors in learning among undergraduates. A quantitative survey approach was employed. The instrument used is a 5-point Likert-scale survey adapted from Pintrich & De Groot (1990). The survey is divided into three sections: Section A collects demographic data, Section B includes 22 items assessing motivational beliefs, and Section C contains 22 items focusing on self-regulated learning strategies. A purposive sample of 282 participants completed the survey. This study finds that learners actively use cognitive strategies and self-regulation in their studies, staying motivated to achieve good grades. They plan and monitor their understanding but feel less confident when comparing themselves to peers in study skills and subject knowledge. Test anxiety is a moderate concern. There is a weak but significant link between self-regulated learning strategies and motivation. Educators should foster intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy while helping students manage test anxiety. Future research should explore how self-regulated learning and motivation influence each other over time.

Self-regulated learning strategies, Motivational beliefs

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co., New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gharghani, A. A., Gharghani, Ma A. & Hayat, A. A. (2019). Correlation of Motivational Beliefs and Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies with Academic Achievement of Students of Shiraz University of Medical Science. Strides Dev Med Educ.,15(1), 1- 8. DOI: 10.5812/sdme.81169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA:: Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ocak,G. & Yamac, A. (2013). Examination of the Relationships between Fifth Graders’ Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, Motivational Beliefs, Attitudes, and Achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 380-387.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1016657 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning Components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Putwain, D., & Daly, A. L. (2014). Test anxiety prevalence and gender differences in a sample of English secondary school students. Educational Studies, 40(5), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2014.953914 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rahmat, N. H. & Thasrabiab, T. (2024) Exploring Motivation and Self-Regulation from the Social Cognitive View. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 14(1), 3276-3290. 10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i1/20476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50048-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–53). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Smit, K., de Brabander, C. J., Boekaerts, M., & Martens, R. L. (2017). The self-regulation of motivation: Motivational strategies as mediator between motivational beliefs and engagement for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 124–134. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.01.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Starr, C.R., Tulagan, N. & Simpkins, S.D. Black and Latinx Adolescents’ STEM Motivational Beliefs: a Systematic Review of the Literature on Parent STEM Support. Educ Psychol Rev 34, 1877–1917 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09700-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Yew, N. A. M., Hamid, N. A. A., Singh, K. K. M., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). Exploring Motivational Beliefs and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Learning among Undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 72 – 89. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i7/17043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zainuddin, N.A., Amin, N., Dahlan, J.M., Rahmat, A.M. & Rahmat, N. H. (2023).Exploring Motivational Beliefs and Learning Approaches among Undergraduates Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Science, 13 (11), 1728-1742. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i11/19539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zimmerman, B., & Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zimmerman, B., & Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study