Knowledge, Rationality and Market: The Market Metaphysics and Governance Discourse of Academic Capitalism

Academic capitalism represents a capitalist system deeply intertwined with neoliberal ideology and educational policy reform. Both academic capitalism and neoliberalism seek to consolidate market dominance and provide unlimited access to capital through the privatization and commodification of academic activities, transforming academia into a capitalist sphere. Neoliberalism reshapes nations of knowledge, rationality, and free discourse within a market-oriented narrative, while new managerialism within universities has codified the theoretical and practical foundations of the academic market. Academic capital is a particular form of capital, and academia is a distinct public sphere linked to the transmission of culture and the development of civilization; therefore, it is essential to recognize the risks and inequalities that result from the polarization of academic capital under the influence of global academic capitalism. A market-based governance model has emerged that tends to detach itself from traditional civilization and national frameworks. This research confirms that an effective academic governance system must be an embedded governance system that coordinates the roles of the state, the university, and the market within an integrated national and ethical system.

Academic capitalism; New managerialism

1. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (2014). Academic Capitalism (Liang Xiao & Li Li, Trans.). Beijing: Peking University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Polanyi, K. (2007). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Era (Feng Gang & Liu Yang, Trans.). Beijing: Contemporary World Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Huang, Y., & Peng, X. (2015). The transformation and persistence of Western academic professions in the process of new managerialism reform. Comparative Education Research, (2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Foster, J. B., & Lu, D. (2019). Neoliberalism as ideology: Origin, essence and impact. Foreign Social Science Frontiers, (10). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hayek, F. A. (1997). Principles of Free Order (Deng Zhenglai, Trans.). Beijing: Life·Reading·New Knowledge Sanlian Bookstore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hayek, F. A. (2000). Law, Legislation and Freedom (Vol. 1) (Deng Zhenglai et al., Trans.). Beijing: China Encyclopedia Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hayek, F. A. (2012). Charter of Freedom (Yang Yusheng et al., Trans.). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hayek, F. A. (1989). Individualism and Economic Order (Jia Zhan et al., Trans.). Beijing: Beijing Institute of Economics Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hayek, F. A. (1997). The Road to Serfdom (Wang Mingyi et al., Trans.). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Deng, Z. (2009). Hayek’s Social Theory. Shanghai: Fudan University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Foucault, M. (2018). The Birth of Biopolitics (Mo Weimin & Zhao Wei, Trans.). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Liang, S. (2005). [Chaohua: Reflections on Life]. Tianjin: Baihua Literature and Art Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Liang, S. (2021). [Essentials of Chinese Culture]. Beijing: The Commercial Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bloom, A. (1994). [Toward a Closed American Spirit] (Miao Qing & Song Lina, Trans.). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Peng, R. (2016). [Rationalism and University Development: A Philosophical and Cultural Review of University Evolution]. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Zhang, X. (2013). [Research on University Rationality]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tu, Y. (2018). [A Study of the History of Higher Education in China]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Delanty, G. (2019). Universities in the Knowledge Society (Huang Jianru, Trans.). Beijing: Peking University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yu, X. (2005). [Studies in Ontology]. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zhong, M., & Miao, Y. (2018). Heterogeneity and regulation of humanities and social sciences in China from the perspective of capital logic. Teaching and Research, (11). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2009). Collected Works (Vol. 3). Beijing: People’s Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lukács, G. (1999). History and Class Consciousness (Du Zhangzhi, Ren Li, & Yan Hongyuan, Trans.). Beijing: The Commercial Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Xi, J. (2022). Xi Jinping on Governance and Administration (Vol. IV). Beijing: Foreign Languages Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Xi Jinping emphasizes regulating and guiding the healthy development of capital in China. (2022, May 1). People’s Daily, p. 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Bao, W., Xie, X., & Wang, W. (2021). Glass tower: The impact of occupational load on the health of university teachers. Peking University Education Review, (3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ye, H., & Wu, H. (2012). On the conflict between academic capitalism and the core mission of universities: A knowledge theory perspective. Higher Education Exploration, (2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Chen, L., & Tang, Z. (2019). Research on the university academic tournament system from the perspective of status-structure-performance. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science Edition), (5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Xue, X., & Liu, G. (2005). Global risk world: Present and future—An interview with Professor Ulrich Beck. Marxism and Reality, (1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wang, M. (2015). [Super-Social System: Civilization and China]. Beijing: Life·Reading·New Knowledge Joint Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zhao, T. (2009). [Study of the Bad World: Political Philosophy as the First Philosophy]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Jacques, M. (2010). When China Rules the World: The Rise of China and the Decline of the Western World (Zhang Li & Liu Qu, Trans.). Beijing: CITIC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Xiong, S. (2019). [Theory of Substance and Function]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education, 37(1), 7–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lynch, K. (2014). New managerialism: The impact on education. Concept, 5(3), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Shattock, M. (1989). Thatcherism and British higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 21(5), 31–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Shattock, M. (1994). The UGC and the Management of British Universities. London: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Melidona, D., et al. (2023). The American College President: 2023 Edition. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Shepherd, S. (2018). Managerialism: An ideal type. Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1668–1678. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Klikauer, T. (2015). What is managerialism? Critical Sociology, 41(7), 1103–1119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Mahameed, M. A. (2023). Management as ideology: “New” managerialism and the corporate university in the period of COVID-19. Financial Accountability & Management, 1(2), 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2018). Managerialism rhetorics in Portuguese higher education. Minerva, 56(4), 511–532. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tapanila, K., Siivonen, P., & Filander, K. (2018). Academics’ social positioning towards the restructured management system in Finnish universities. Studies in Higher Education, 43(1), 117–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Kukathas, C. (1989). Hayek and Modern Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Harvey, D. (2014). Reading Capital with David Harvey (Vol. 1) (Liu Ying, Trans.). Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study