Bridging the Generational Gap: Leadership Challenges and Management Strategies for Millennials in a Malaysian Manufacturing SME

This study examines how Millennials are understood and managed within a Malaysian manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprise (SME), addressing persistent workplace tensions between Millennial expectations and traditional organisational practices. Guided by Constructivist Grounded Theory, the study employed purposive sampling and involved 23 participants comprising four Heads of Department, ten managers, and nine Millennial employees. Data were collected through focus group discussions and analysed iteratively using open, axial, and selective coding. Findings show that Millennials were characterised as value-oriented and meaning-seeking, wellbeing-oriented, recognition- and development-seeking, and highly sensitive to hierarchy, communication, and psychological treatment. Key workplace challenges included excessive workload and production pressure, communication breakdown, limited psychological safety, role ambiguity, and vulnerability to disengagement and turnover. Leadership practices were hybrid, combining developmental and training-centred approaches, relational and communication-focused practices, control and performance-oriented mechanisms, and adaptive balancing strategies. The study identifies organisational misalignment and the negotiation of work meaning as the central phenomenon explaining Millennial workplace experiences, emerging when manufacturing demands, hierarchical structures, and performance expectations conflict with employees' expectations for meaningful work, wellbeing, recognition, development, and respectful communication. In response, the study develops the Adaptive Alignment Framework, which explains how Millennial characteristics, organisational pressures, workplace challenges, and leadership responses interact dynamically to shape engagement, cooperation, retention, and turnover intention. The study concludes that effective Millennial management requires continuous alignment between organisational realities and evolving employee expectations rather than reliance on fixed generational stereotypes or a single leadership style, offering practical guidance for leadership development, communication, wellbeing, and retention in contemporary manufacturing workplaces.

Millennials, leadership, manufacturing SME, organisational misalignment, psychological safety

1. Adejumo, O.A., 2024. The relevance of leadership alignment to attaining organizational resilience. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 9(5), p.6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aitken, J., Deakins, E., Skipworth, H. and Cole, R., 2025. Temporal perceptions and tensions in production management. European Management Journal, 43(3), pp.502-513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aksoy, E., 2025. Balancing act: Exploring the interplay of production pressure and innovation/flexibility climates on employee well-being. Creativity and Innovation Management, 34(1), pp.222-236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Allen, J.A. and Magill, M.S., 2026. Psychological safety and engagement: the importance of collaboration and experience. Journal of Management Development, 45(2), pp.151-165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Amarilli, F., van den Hooff, B. and van Vliet, M., 2023. Business-IT alignment as a coevolution process: An empirical study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 32(2), p.101776. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Arokiasamy, A.R.A., Wider, W., Tanucan, J.C.M. and Hossain, S.F.A., 2025. Optimizing employee productivity: The mediating role of employee engagement in training programs for Malaysian SMEs. Asian Development Policy Review, 13(3), pp.310-324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Aswani, D. and Otiende, J.O., 2024. Effective workplace communication: organizational subcultures and communication preferences for Gen Z's. Journal of the Kenya National Commission for UNESCO, 5(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bakhtiar, B. and Molang, A., 2025. The meaning of employee loyalty among Millennials in the age of gig economy and side hustles. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 5(2), pp.464-475. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bantha, T., Nayak, U. and Mishra, S.K., 2024. Engaging the disengaged: the role of workplace spirituality on millennials' work engagement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(9), pp.1713-1738. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Basit, A., Sebastian, V. and Hassan, Z., 2018. Impact of leadership style on employee performance (a case study on a private organization in Malaysia). International Journal of Accounting & Business Management, 5(2), pp.112-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bustani and Juniar, A., 2023. Exploring transformational leadership and employee performance: The mediation role of psychological empowerment Millennial generation. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 4(4), pp.697-717. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Charmaz, K., 2014. Constructing grounded theory. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cho, H., Rodriguez, A.C. and Ardichvili, A., 2025. Generational differences under scrutiny: issues and implications for HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 27(2-3), pp.62-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cho, H., Steege, L.M. and Arsenault Knudsen, É.N., 2023. Psychological safety, communication openness, nurse job outcomes, and patient safety in hospital nurses. Research in Nursing & Health, 46(4), pp.445-453. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Clarke, E., Malinen, S., Näswall, K. and Masselot, A., 2026. Safe to stay: The role of leader behaviors and psychological safety in employee retention in high-demand workplaces. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 40(1), pp.56-86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Diehl, M.R. and Cropanzano, R., 2025. Social exchange theory: Novel directions and new opportunities. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, (1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Farhan, B.Y., 2021. Customizing leadership practices for the millennial workforce: A conceptual framework. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), p.1930865. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1930865 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Frost, L., 2025. Exploring contributing factors in psychological contract formation. New Zealand Journal of Health and Safety Practice, 2(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gelencsér, M., Szabó-Szentgróti, G., Kőmüves, Z.S. and Hollósy-Vadász, G., 2023. The holistic model of labour retention: The impact of workplace wellbeing factors on employee retention. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), p.121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Halkias, D., Neubert, M., Thurman, P.W. and Harkiolakis, N., 2022. The multiple case study design: Methodology and application for management education. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hanafi, W.N.W., Daud, S., Baharin, N.L., Noordiana Wan Hanafi, W. and Lyana Baharin, N., 2020. Leadership attributes among Generation X and millennials leaders. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hidayat, A., Amelia, A., Budiwidodo, S., Suherli, E. and Chandrasari, F., 2025. Makna employee engagement bagi generasi milenial: Pendekatan fenomenologi. Cakrawala Repositori IMWI, 8(2), pp.1538-1546. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Jenei, S., Horváth, F., Molnár, J., Gyurián, N., Poyda-Nosyk, N., Dávid, L.D. and Kálmán, B.G., 2025. Generational differences and organizational resilience: Addressing workplace conflicts. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, pp.2560-2569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Katsaros, K.K., 2024. Gen Z employee adaptive performance: The role of inclusive leadership and workplace happiness. Administrative Sciences, 14(8), p.163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Khaddage-Soboh, N., Yunis, M., Imran, M. and Zeb, F., 2024. Sustainable practices in Malaysian manufacturing: The influence of CSR, transformational leadership, and green organizational culture on environmental performance. Economic Analysis and Policy, 82, pp.753-768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Konečná, L., Lisá, E. and Čiriková, V., 2026. The role of leadership in shaping psychological safety: a qualitative study from Slovakia. Scientific Reports. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Moon, B. and Kang, M., 2025. Breaking employee silence through dialogic employee communication: mediating roles of psychological safety and psychological empowerment. Management Communication Quarterly, 39(2), pp.230-262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nyamboga, T.O., 2025. Strategic leadership in multigenerational workforces: Bridging generational divides for enhanced engagement. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 19(1), pp.270-285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Olszyńska, K., Górka, E., Ćwiąkała, M., Baran, D., Saługa, K., Zawadzki, D., Wyrzykowska-Antkiewicz, M., Piwnik, J. and Ślusarczyk, M., 2026. Empathetic leadership in managing Generation Z. European Research Studies Journal, 29(1), pp.629-639. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ramlan, M., Akob, M. and Jumady, E., 2025. The role of leadership in fostering employee engagement: A literature analysis. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 5(2), pp.360-373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Respati, Y.A., Rusdiyanto, W., Yovianingtyas, C. and Tajudin, A., 2023. Understanding millennial generation organizational social exchange through psychological contract. J. Econ, 19(1), pp.95-111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Saraiva, M. and Nogueiro, T., 2025. Perspectives and realities of disengagement among younger generation Y and Z workers in contemporary work dynamics. Administrative Sciences, 15(4), p.133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Silva, I., Dias, Á. and Pereira, L.F., 2024. Determinants of employee intention to stay: a generational multigroup analysis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(8), pp.1389-1418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Suhartono, S., Sulastiningsih, S., Chasanah, U., Widiastuti, N. and Purwanto, W., 2023. The relationship of leadership, discipline, satisfaction, and performance: A case study of steel manufacture in Indonesia. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(2), p.4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Woo, D. and Bertram, V., 2022. "I value collaboration but won't get pushed around": Uncovering tensions in Millennials' vocational anticipatory socialization. Western Journal of Communication, 86(3), pp.400-421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yunita, T., Hadita, H., Wijayanti, M. and Ismayani, V., 2023. Work-life balance, job satisfaction, and career development of Millennials: The mediating role of affective commitment. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 26(1), pp.89-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zahirah, N.G. and Satrya, A., 2024. The influence of career growth and perceived organizational support on turnover intention: The role of organizational commitment among Indonesian millennial employees. EKOMBIS REVIEW: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 12(3), pp.3129-3146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zarwi, M., Marchand, S., Kennard, B. and Michael, J., 2023. Millennials and organisational commitment: current and future perspectives. Human Resource Development International, 26(5), pp.642-654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors
• A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
• Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover
• Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation in Davao Region
• Cost of Silence: Exploring the Impact of Organisational Silence on Employee Engagement