Analysis of the Implementation of Digital-Based Public Information Transparency and Public Communication at the District Attorney’s Office of Tasikmalaya City

Authors

Faiq Zaen Audillah

Sahid University, Jakarta, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Hifni Alifahmi

Sahid University, Jakarta, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700315

Subject Category: Digital Supply Chain

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 4644-4651

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-14

Accepted: 2026-07-22

Published: 2026-07-31

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of digital-based public information transparency and public communication within the Intelligence Section of the District Attorney’s Office of Tasikmalaya City in the context of digital governance transformation. The demand for transparency and public accountability has continued to increase alongside the rapid development of information technology and the implementation of Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Transparency. Social media has become a strategic channel for disseminating legal information, clarifying public issues, and establishing institutional relationships with the community. This study aims to analyze the implementation of digital-based public information transparency, identify the characteristics of digital public communication, and examine digital communication campaign strategies, including branding, tagline usage, and audience segmentation from the perspective of Government Public Relations.
This research employs a qualitative approach using a case study method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, social media content analysis, and institutional documentation. The theoretical framework applied in this study includes Transparency Theory, Excellence Theory, Digital Governance, and Government Public Relations.
The findings indicate that public information transparency has been implemented through activity publications, dissemination of legal information, and digital communication campaigns. However, communication practices remain dominated by the one-way Public Information model. Digital branding and communication campaign strategies have not been fully integrated with dialogic approaches and audience segmentation. The major challenges include limited human resources, unintegrated internal communication management, and low responsiveness to public feedback.
This study concludes that digital-based public information transparency depends not only on the availability of information, but also on the quality of dialogue, message consistency, digital campaign strategies, and public participation within the framework of Government Public Relations.

Keywords

Public Information Transparency, Digital Public Communication, Transparency, Excellence Theory, Digital Governance, Public Trust, District Attorney’s Office.

Downloads

References

1. Book & E-book References [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies. State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cangara, H. (2014).Introduction to communication science.RajaGrafindo Persada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Coombs, W. T. (2019). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2015). The handbook of crisis communication. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Effendy, O. U. (2017).Communication science: Theory and practice.PT Rosdakarya Youth. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984).Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kriyantono, R. (2014).Public relations writing and professional public relations practice.Golden. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Moleong, L. J. (2019). Qualitative research methodology.PT Rosdakarya Youth. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Morrison. (2014).Public relations: Theory and practice.Kencana Prenada Media Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nasution, S. (2016).Research method: Scientific research.Earth of Letters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nurudin. (2017).Introduction to mass communication.PT RajaGrafindo Persada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sugiyono. (2018).Qualitative research methods: For research that is exploratory, interpretive, interactive, and constructive.Alphabet. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Widodo, J. (2018).Public transparency and accountability. Gava Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Journal References & Online Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ball, C., & Piotrowski, S. (2010). Transparency Theory and public sector accountability. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 409–418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2016). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 10–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Gil-García, J. R. (2022). Digital governance in the public sector: A review of current trends and future research. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hidayat, A. (2021). The Attorney General's Public Relations Strategy in Building a Positive Image Through Instagram Social Media.Journal of Government Communication, 9(2), 115–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Janssen, M., & van den Hoven, J. (2018). Big data and public sector ethics: Transparency, fairness, and accountability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(3), 403–415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2020). An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lestari, S., & Yusuf, F. (2023). Issue management and image restoration of local government on social media.Journal of Digital Politics & Communication, 5(1), 44–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mahmood, S., Weerakkody, V., & Chen, W. (2020). The role of ICT in transforming government and citizen trust. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198–206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Meijer, A. (2023). Revisiting the concept of open governance: Digital dialogues and institutional trust. Public Management Review, 25(9), 1315–1334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Piotrowski, S., & Van Ryzin, G. (2017). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government: The role of trust and responsiveness. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(3), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Pratama, R., & Dewi, N. (2022). The role of digital public communication in the transparency of the performance of the Bandung City Government.Journal of Information & Public Policy, 14(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Putra, R. (2019). Image and reputation of public institutions through digital media: A study of the Indonesian National Police.Journal of Communication, 11(2), 121–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rahmawati, D. (2016). Government public relations communication strategies in realizing public information transparency in the digital era.Journal of Communication Science, 8(1), 22–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Rawlins, B. (2018). Measuring organizational transparency: The relationship between transparent communication and trust. Public Relations Journal, 12(1), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Reig, N., Gasco-Hernandez, M., & Esteve, M. (2021). Internal and external transparency in public-private partnerships: The case of Barcelona’s water provision. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1662–1681. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Santoso, A. (2024). Public information disclosure and public trust in legal institutions in Indonesia.Journal of Public Administration, 12(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sari, K., & Nugroho, M. (2017). Utilization of social media by government agencies to increase public participation.Journal of Public Communication, 5(2), 87–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wulandari, E. (2020). Implementation of Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning public information disclosure in regional governments.Journal of Public Policy, 6(3), 201–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles