Development and Content Validation of the CLEAR Module: An ADDIE-Based Mnemonic Strategy Module for Fraction Word Problem-Solving among Primary School Pupils
Authors
Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700374
Subject Category: Mathematics
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 5535-5549
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-20
Accepted: 2026-07-26
Published: 2026-08-01
Abstract
Fraction word problems remain one of the most persistent sources of difficulty in primary mathematics education, requiring pupils to integrate conceptual understanding of fractions with the linguistic and strategic demands of word-problem interpretation. This study reports the development and content validation of the CLEAR Module, an instructional module that operationalises a five-step mnemonic strategy (Circle, Line, Evaluate, Answer, Recheck) for fraction word-problem solving among Year Four primary pupils in Malaysia. Guided by the ADDIE instructional design model, the module's development integrated a needs analysis (semi-structured interviews with three purposively sampled mathematics education experts), a design phase grounded in an integration of Polya's problem-solving model, Piagetian constructivism, and Vygotskian social constructivism, and an evaluation phase assessing content validity and reliability. Content validity was established using both the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR), with three subject-matter experts evaluating ten module components. All components achieved an Item-Level CVI (I-CVI) and CVR of 1.00, and a Scale-Level CVI (S-CVI/Ave) of 1.00, indicating excellent content validity. Internal consistency reliability, assessed with a 16-teacher field trial over a six-week implementation period, yielded a Cronbach's alpha of .89. Teacher feedback further indicated favourable perceptions of the module's systematic structure, usability, and potential to support fraction word-problem instruction, alongside recommendations for greater question variety and simplified instructional language. The findings support the CLEAR Module as a content-valid and reliable instructional resource and offer a theoretically grounded, replicable design process for mnemonic-based mathematics modules. Limitations and directions for a subsequent effectiveness study are discussed.
Keywords
fraction word problems, CLEAR mnemonic strategy
Downloads
References
1. Bal, A. P., & Doğanay, A. (2022). Problem-solving and students’ use of metacognitive skills. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 17(4), 142–163. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2022.478.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Björkhammer, C., Hedman, M., Krey, A.-K., Samuelsson, J., Träff, U., & Östergren, R. (2025). Effects of a fraction intervention for students with special educational needs in mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2025.2552232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Branch, R. M. (2014). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Doleck, T. (2021). Strategic competence for multistep fraction word problems: An overlooked aspect of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10028-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2014). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (1997). Survey of instructional development models (3rd ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hänze, M., & Leiss, D. (2022). Using heuristic worked examples to promote solving of reality-based tasks in mathematics in lower secondary school. Instructional Science, 50(4), 529–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09583-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Herold-Blasius, R. (2025). The role of strategy keys in enhancing heuristics and self-regulation in mathematical problem-solving: A qualitative, explorative, and type-building study with primary school students. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 17(4), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2024.2430135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. López-Martín, M. del M., Aguayo-Arriagada, C. G., & García López, M. del M. (2022). Preservice elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge on fractions as operator in word problems. Mathematics, 10(3), Article 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ministry of Education Singapore. (2025). Mathematics syllabus: Primary one to six. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction (8th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. OECD. (2024). Common challenges in mathematics curriculum reform: International experiences. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The Content Validity Index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Pólya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Sari, I. P., Suryadi, D., Herman, T., Dahlan, J. A., & Supriyadi, E. (2024). Learning obstacles on fractions: A scoping review. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p377-392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Sercenia, J. C., & Prudente, M. S. (2023). Effectiveness of the metacognitive-based pedagogical intervention on mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16432a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
- Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
- Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
- Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
- Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples